If Hillary comes she will have her own priorities. Every American President think of Indian subcontinent only in last 6 months of tenuer. If she has to teach lesson, whom she will teach Parvez or Monica ?
RE:US poll nad Pak President
by AntiTerrorMan on Jan 01, 2008 06:35 PM Permalink
clinton doing all his best to keep Hillary in white house and busy, so that Bill can play with Monica some more time....
It very interesting note media very vocal for democracy in pakistan against musharraf rule as dictatorial. But political intervention of america in pakistan is which kind of democracy ? Democracy in Pakistan will decided by people of Pakistan.Media is irrational in behavior in terns of democracy. American imposed tragic democracy is witnessed in iraq by world helplessly.
"Hillary Clinton, the former First Lady of the United States, will be the next US president while there is a possibility of Pakistan president Pervez Musharraf [Images] losing his job by the end of the year, a media report claimed on Monday." WHICH REPORT? WHAT MEDIA? WHO CLAIMED? HOW DID THEY ARRIVE AT THIS CONCLUSION?
Surely REdiff can do better than this kind of content?
RE:wat a story ... WAH
by rose patel on Jan 01, 2008 10:40 AM Permalink
U R Right questioning so called media repor. But the 'news' is like music to ears. Too good to believe. What ever may be the base of the news, true Indian shud think that it proves correct, given Hillary likes India very much and Mush, least said is better!
There is vacuum in leadership at the the highest political levels in many places. Can we hope New year 2008 will bring in new faces with sincerity and more humane outlook in them
How pathetic Pakistan has become. It has finally ended up as a country dictated by the Americans thousands of miles away. In other words,a slave country to US. If this isnt a shame,I dont know what is. As much I hate the problems in India,it is a billion times better than Pakistan. There's no comparison really. Jai Hind.
RE:Papistan
by ayesha jawaid on Jan 01, 2008 09:06 AM Permalink
well not Pakistan is US slave, only few personnel our puppets of US. You are wrong in your opinion about your neighbor county. I being a citizen of Pakistan can knows the conditions better than those living outside.
RE:Papistan
by Sun on Jan 01, 2008 09:29 AM Permalink
Maybe not the people of Pak as you said,but the truth is most of the rulers are slaves of US,bowing to their diktats all the time.
RE:Papistan
by Sami on Jan 01, 2008 12:50 PM Permalink
Ms. Ayesha jawaid, all the personnel who ruled pakistan either with democracy or with military rule or with president rule, were ruling under the guidance (control)of US. like iowa Az Mn etc Pak also one. but of pak did not get the benifits of other states like Az washington DC Fl Tx so it may be called as slave. It gave shoulder to US from where US attacked your brothers in Afghanistan. If Pak did not help then the Talibans would not have gone against you. Now the pakistan has gone to the point of no return. I Pray Allah the Almighty.
RE:Papistan
by on Jan 01, 2008 02:29 PM Permalink
Yeah...this proves the point heaven and hell are here in earth.... you wanted to bleed India( doesnt matter how much you claim... every pakistani would love to see a weak india or Indai in 25 pieces)look who is blleding... you people tried to be smart but remeber even the machivillian tactics worked only for machivalli...once he died Italy was back to its originality...so g take a break stop spreading hatred and see what follow what Islam has taught you sincerely and see the difference
