unfortunately we lost Sri. P V Narasimha Roaji, if he would have been currnt PM he would have eradicated Sikh militany (as before) and islamic terrorism from Indian soil
RE:unfortunately we lost Sri. P V Narasimha Roaji, if he would have been currnt PM he would have eradicated Sikh militany (as before) and islamic terrorism from Indian soil
by dddelhi on Dec 31, 2007 02:52 PM Permalink
alas he is no more.... but we have sonia and her baby rahul.. you can request them...
RE:why can't ISI takes care of its internal security instead of indulging in anti Indian activities
by Dileep on Dec 31, 2007 07:14 PM Permalink
LOL! Nice joke buddy. :-)
To counter the continuous threat of terrorism by state sponsored ISI, India needs to develop a counter attacking, proxy system same as that of Pakistan. We should not indulge in terrorist activities, but start eleminating top and middle level ISI officers and agents. Right in Pakistan. Kidnap that Don and bring him to India. This way, ISI will fear India and will be in complete disarray to conduct any such terror activities in India.
RE:India be Proactive
by GN on Dec 31, 2007 02:47 PM Permalink
if the link with ISI is proven. no need of trials. just kill them. no life imprisonment pleease. Just shoot. Anybody who is helping ISI and prmoting the idea of destroying the mother land should be killed by any means. By legally or illegally ACCEPTABLE irrespective of their religion.
RE:India be Proactive
by V S on Dec 31, 2007 04:16 PM Permalink
I meant that India should ensure law and order inside it's own territory so there is no room for disgruntled elements.
and I do not agree with your logic of killing illegally. That is jungle law and not acceptable in democracy.
We have arranged train and bus services for the guys to come to India and do all sort of terrorist activities. I don't think Indians are fond of Pakistan. Anyone who is coming to India from Pakistan and anyone who is going to Pakistan are equally dangerous to our national security. Like the Israeli's do we should have security men follow these guys and observe their activities. Unless we have the feeling of belonging to India, rather than considering our language, religios faith etc., our enemies are there to exploit us. I am belonging to a minority, but I am grateful to the majority for giving us so much freedom to carry on with our religious faith without being harassed or prerssurised. There is no doubt that nowhere in the world the minorities are enjoying the freedom what they are getting in India. Jai Hind.
Tytler should be punished. I donot say that it will remove terrorism. Many Sikh youths can see how tytler is being saved by CBI & our Govt. still the justice for the 84riots is awaited. Justice is the best way to tackle Terrorism
RE:Justice is the best way to tackle Terrorism
by V S on Dec 31, 2007 02:29 PM Permalink
yeah there is a list of 207 people involved in 1984. they should all be hung.
RE:Justice is the best way to tackle Terrorism
by anshu nagar on Dec 31, 2007 07:24 PM Permalink
How many people will you hang? How many more lives will be lost? Is there an end to all of this??
Kalyug hai Kalyug..ghor Kalyug.
jeeyo aur jeeno do....remember we are indians, our past was glorious, our present is, our future will be. don't let the tactics and strategies of the west affect you. Do not get involved in any bloodshed or any jihadist or anti-social ideology. just work, live and try for peace. if you can't be at peace with yourself, you cannot be at peace with anybody else.
RE:Justice is the best way to tackle Terrorism
by purnav on Dec 31, 2007 02:29 PM Permalink
Come on Guys , even people have put behind 2002 Godhra and getting on with their daily lives.It is in the best interest of this nation, that we dont rake up the past and rub salts on many wounds.
RE:Justice is the best way to tackle Terrorism
by Gurdeep Singh on Dec 31, 2007 02:32 PM Permalink
Purnav, it might be easier for someone to forget the past if it didn't happen to him. It is much difficult for someone who suffered badly. The govt is already rubbing salt on the wounds of the victims by protecting the accused.
RE:RE:Justice is the best way to tackle Terrorism
by V S on Dec 31, 2007 02:30 PM Permalink
why ? would you let your family be burnt alive and "let it go " ?
RE:The patriotic Indians will not forgive ManMohan singh!!!
by tali on Dec 31, 2007 02:26 PM Permalink
Our nationalistic leader sudarshan uses Sikh slogans during shakahs.This proves Sikhs are very much part of Hindu heritage.Some Muzzies are trying to split this brotherhood. Hinduism is the mother of sikhism!!!
RE:The patriotic Indians will not forgive ManMohan singh!!!
by V S on Dec 31, 2007 02:27 PM Permalink
sikhism is a distinct religion. it takes it's tenets from hinduism , buddhism as well as Islam.
RE:The patriotic Indians will not forgive ManMohan singh!!!
by GN on Dec 31, 2007 02:31 PM Permalink
Sikhism took birth to protect hinduism from the Mughal conversions.
But Today Hinduism is like the big mountain which is divided into small hills in diff. names in the name of caste and other break ups.
the so called hindu leaders and the BJP who is protraying itself as savior of HINDUISM, must understand the importance of all castes of Hinduism to unite together.
RE:The patriotic Indians will not forgive ManMohan singh!!!
by V S on Dec 31, 2007 04:18 PM Permalink
sikhism actually was born from the sufi movement...not to protect hinduism but to do away with the evils of it such as dowry , caste , idol worship etc...
the sikhs who you are portraying as the saviours of the hindus were actually khalsa force of guru gobind singh...and were just one category of sikhs.
RE:The patriotic Indians will not forgive ManMohan singh!!!
by IMPARTIAL on Jan 01, 2008 05:37 AM Permalink
You are right except that there was nothing like separate name or distinct identity to do away with social evils.That was just like various other sects of Hinduism during Bhakti Andolan of 14/15th century onwards.
Separate identity was introduced by Guru Gobind Singh ji on 13-04-1699 which actually and practically was a military wing to take up weapons against opressors.
IB must also look at the aspect of renewed militancy of Fake Hindutwavadi', who are burning the Worshiping place in Orissa, sponsored by BJP SanghParivar.
This is a blot on the Biggest Democracy like India.
Today, we have a Devot Hindu President, Muslim Vice President, Sikh PM, Bengalee Speaker of Lok Sabha, A Dalit Chief Justice and a Christian Heading the Oldest and the current ruling Political Party.
RE:IB MUST ALSO WARN FAKE HINDU MILITANTS WHO ARE TROUBLING THE MINORITY- CHURCH BURNING IN ORISSA
by V S on Dec 31, 2007 02:26 PM Permalink
There is always alarm over minorities and they get labelled easily. Scientific studies prove that the tendency to label minorities is innate in any democracy...more so in a half literate one like India.
your point is correct that hindutva is not seen as a destabilizing force but if minorities do something they are seen as anti national.
In reality all riots be it 1984 , 2002 post godhra are anti national.
RE:IB MUST ALSO WARN FAKE HINDU MILITANTS WHO ARE TROUBLING THE MINORITY- CHURCH BURNING IN ORISSA
by GN on Dec 31, 2007 02:34 PM Permalink
Sudhakar. The act of buring churches and harming the christians is to be condemened.
but why the hell you people not stopping the mad Christian missioneries who are preaching conversion abusing and defaming other religions.
( The most extremists in the world are the TAlibans, Even this christian missioneries from German did tried preaching them for conversion. Result was getting jailed in afghanistan. and these idiot missioneries deserve that)
RE:IB MUST ALSO WARN FAKE HINDU MILITANTS WHO ARE TROUBLING THE MINORITY- CHURCH BURNING IN ORISSA
by V S on Dec 31, 2007 04:19 PM Permalink
GN conversion is not a violent act. you cannot justify killing christians for that. it just shows your insecurity.
RE:IB MUST ALSO WARN FAKE HINDU MILITANTS WHO ARE TROUBLING THE MINORITY- CHURCH BURNING IN ORISSA
by murukku dharan on Dec 31, 2007 02:57 PM Permalink
Dear, First of all, understand Hinduism is not a religion - All those who considers India/Bharat as their own country & her culture/language their own, are hindus - Question is why Some religion try to increase their numbers by fair unfair means - why they are accountable to a overseas State - why some religion consider a foreign language their own & people are taught in that language - is it for a new nation which will spring up after enough production & use that language at that time - why some think they are not born to India but come from desert-Why missionary work has no scope in muslim dominated countries - why so called hindus unable to convert other religions into their fold - why political parties(x,an owned, foreign funded etc) never allow so called hindus to unite - there are so many questions to be answered - Dalit, muslim, x'ian etc combinations are all fake - It will eventually lead to clear division of Hindus & others - I challenge
RE:RE:IB MUST ALSO WARN FAKE HINDU MILITANTS WHO ARE TROUBLING THE MINORITY- CHURCH BURNING IN ORISSA
by V S on Dec 31, 2007 04:19 PM Permalink
murruku that is your perception.
Token justice never works. By making Manmohan Singh the PM, our politicians think that they have meted out justice to the sikhs killed in 1984 riots. However to the victims such gimmicks dont matter. They want the perpetrators of the crimes behind the bars. The victims would be more happy if instead of tokenism, real justice is done and and the perpetrators are punished.
Instead of blaming the ISI why don't we look at ourselves. Why do we give such opportunities to them to create trouble for us? Now we before we start labelling people as terrorists and start killing them in the name of abolishing terrorism, do we have the courage to punish the rogue elements in the government itself who after killing so many of innocent people are enjoying protection from 'terrorists' at taxpayers expense.
RE:sikhism is a distinct religion and not part of hinduism
by GN on Dec 31, 2007 02:35 PM Permalink
you are wrong Mr.VS. Had you ever read / heard Granth sahib. I am a hindu, My in-laws are Sikhs.
