Al Qaeda does not have a mailing address. Do they have armoured vehicles? do they have misciles? do they they have fighter jets? do they have atleast bullet proof vests? 37 coutries who have surrounded alquaedah have all these. What these countries are doing? even a small mobile phone operator can find out that where the call comes from. after bombing they congrartulate themselves over phone and these countries call an UN security council emergency meeting.
the meeting did not deside whether to take action against Alquaedah
RE:Al Quaeda
by ashish shekhar on Dec 29, 2007 11:26 AM Permalink
Al Quida has committed politically wrong act by killing Benazir. No matter how liberal, she was a muslim first. Worst still 20 more people (all muslims) were killed in the attack. This will not help Al quida. There are lots of muslims all over the world who support AL quida becoz of religion. Many of then don't even understand its motive, ideology, priciples etc. They just support it in the name of religion. By killing muslims AL Quida is diluting the communal divide and the islamic fundamentalism which is its support base.
RE:RE:Al Quaeda
by shahid khan on Dec 29, 2007 11:53 AM Permalink
Dear Brother Ashis I do not believe AQ has any support in the world wide muslim community except PAK and AFGANISTAN where the education among the people is very low , some people may support religion but to kill any human being under the cover of religion is not acceptable by any means. AQ is an idealogy , they are required to be brought on the table and their grievances can be propelry addresed.
RE:Al Quaeda
by shahid khan on Dec 29, 2007 11:41 AM Permalink
Dear Sami Whether you believe or do not believe terror forces always exist with different names, if you go back in the history Late prime minister Indira Ghandhi Assasinated by kHALISTAN terrorist , Late PM Rajiv Ghandhi was killed by socide bumber from LTTE and so many more. The Armoury you mentioned is not needed for hidden and gourilla war which they follow , their motivation comes from idealogy. Infect taloban OR LTTE they are not group of people they are a idealogy, so it is needed to recognise them as a political force and to be brought in the main stream politics .
RE:Al Quaeda
by Sami on Dec 29, 2007 02:20 PM Permalink
i accept. People know binranvale, people know prabhakaran. bindanvale is killed and you getting news about prabhakaran. his representative come and discuss with many leaders of various countries. you say Osama is the leader. When Indian army can catch and kill bindrenvale why cant they cath osama? What the 37 countries do sitting in afghanistan? suddenly they kill some poor people and say terreroists. After one week they tell that an enquiry is set up to investigate the civilian death by military operation.
Do you know where is Alqaedah operating from? if Alquaeda killed benazir why the government fire service vehicle clean the blood spots immediately?
Are you sure? can you say one Alquaeda leader now whom any one can identify except Bush and Mush? After a bomb blast you will say Alquaeda attacked and name a new leader who carried out attcks. After the attack you give long history of the man. He involved in so many attacks before.
The people who are behind Killing a woman national Leader in Public deserve the greatest punishment from the almighty! All Civic society and the people should condemn such atrocity and punish the whole team responsible for such a ghostly in human act on public lives.
RE:Killing a Woman
by simha chalam on Dec 29, 2007 10:51 AM Permalink
In addition to having killed, the B* accept that they did it. Donno what their Govt is doing & what that bushy Bush is upto
I wish that we could leave at one place without boundries and barriers with our what ever is belief with love, affection towards others and share our joys and sorrows, we all are childeren of Adam and eve. Without harming others and raising finger to others. Zamir Ahmed India.
Though i m not supporting pakistan in anyway for a simple reason that i am an indian muslim.and any country who has an agenda against my country will not be supported by me neither will get sympathy from me . but Dont u think that pakistan is also inflicted by Terrorism. If Islam as a religion is spreading terrorism then who are terrorist killing pakistani Muslim ???? they should not just bcoz they also belong to same religion.now the point is its still happening bcoz they are not sparing muslims either which means they are not concerned about religous teachings !! they are more concerned about their political agenda. Taliban wants afganistan, Pakistani Terrorist wants kashmir,Iraqis wants iraq without US, Palestinians wants palestine..So to cut the story short. They are not imposing Islam on others, they want their Political Identity but at the cost of Innocent lives, which is a wrong method and they will never succeed in this. Allah dont Support those who kill innocent people or try to bring unrest in the society.
RE:SUPPORT TERRORISM
by arp on Dec 29, 2007 11:12 AM Permalink
dear JLlalbhi,sorry to say they are fighting for power only.iniraq sunni with sia,in pak vaziristan vrses pakistan in palestine fatah agaist own other parties,see syria,turky,afganistan allmuslim criminals are killing own innocent muslim ppl.same in j&k killings muslims only.in india naxals belongs to hindu,adivasi also killing hindu and adivasi.hence my freind these are hard core criminals.they are killing only to get power.they have no feelinds for humanity or religion.regards.JAIHIND
Definitely,Musharraf is Behind the Killing.I am sure Benazir's Killing is an Political assasination..& some ppl trying to Blame Extremist.. Extremist element in pakistan are against Musharraf & His Pro-Us policies,not against Benazir.. It is definitely clear that Some political Forces are behind her Killing..
Sad with the surmise "..like all previous assassinations, will remain unsolved.". However, this artice is a polished, sensitive and empathic understanding of the real person.
So often the real person is lost in the cacaphony of verbiage. This soft touch brings live a presence which otherwise would have remained unfelt.
RE:RE:sympathy?
by Arshad on Dec 29, 2007 11:07 AM Permalink
they dont know know judge the person or leader.. she is good leader,good thinker & her caliber better than musharaf, nawaz sharief..& sonia too she had good terms with India
RE:sympathy?
by Peace on Dec 29, 2007 11:08 AM Permalink
they are not a true muslims.. muslims should learn in madressa only.. so go to see one kafir get killed.
RE:sympathy?
by Arshad on Dec 29, 2007 11:18 AM Permalink
sorry it is not good to reply to you... you are tipcal hindu like tipcal muslim ( rss or hindu terroist) or uneducated person
will you please explain to me and other readers what did you find offesive in my reply to RAJNI FAN when he made fun of sardar ji is it ok to poke fun about SIKHS on your blogg
RE:for moderator
by manoj krishnamachar on Dec 29, 2007 11:08 AM Permalink
actually johny lever has done a good job as sadar in govinda movie singing tunak tunak....tarara....
please do not fault mr sood . he may be suffering from Alzheimer or dementia. he tought he was writing for ex boss have pity on the poor soul. after all his life he worked as a BABU in some govt office . it will help paki school students to write a essay on BENZIR at least he did not write bad about a dead person, better than many in media
wondering why rediff backed up the himachal pradesh elections.Sick about BJP??.. BJP got a thumping majority wining morethan 2/3. BJP continues to rock from gujarat to himachal.. congress dies for their pseudo securalism and false propaganda about bjp as comminual.. jai hind...
