Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 230 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Pakistan is
by UmaShankar SathyaKumar on Dec 28, 2007 04:58 AM  Permalink 

worst than Iraq
worst than Afghanistan
worst than Iran
worst than North Korea

Pakistan Army and Police is working for Taliban&Co. Taliban&Co is working for Al-Qaida&Co. Al-Qaida&Co is working for God.

US had just given $250 millions in aid to Pakistan (No Wire transfer FEE!). Is that proves something? Bush & Binladen are Friends by birth!!

Pakistan is a Nuclear Time Bomb in waiting. I think that the timer is getting very closer and closer.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
America should take over Pakistan
by kunal kadam on Dec 28, 2007 04:16 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I think there is nothing left now for Pakistan to be as an independant country. They are totally dependant on UA Aid and they can not even execute one free poll. Their leader are getting assasinated, there is deeep penetration of Al-Quida in Pakistan Army. Their Nuclear Weapons are under US's control. So I think better they should hand over the controls to USA and that is the only option left for them...

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:America should take over Pakistan
by Ram Suresh on Dec 28, 2007 05:41 AM  Permalink
Liberate Pakistan from the clutches of OSAMA(MUSHARAF)Indira Gandhi did it once, can any Leader come forward to do it????

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:America should take over Pakistan
by beessmilla on Dec 28, 2007 08:04 PM  Permalink
LIBERATE YOUR MIND FROM 6 TH CENTURY TRIBAL FELLOW.

SEEK ALLAH HELP,BLESSINGS

6 th century tribal fellows - who does not have mind of their own
by beessmilla on Dec 28, 2007 07:11 PM | Hide replies

These people are 6 th century tribal fellow followers who does not have mind of their own.

their blind belief is causing all sorts of problem.
their irnorence and vingence against other thinking people,is causing damage to the civilised world.

Allah should refine these tribal fellows or
civilised society should kill these terrorists

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Who cares
by rohit gupta on Dec 28, 2007 03:43 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Guys, do we really care if she was killed? Its natural for the emotions to take over but the truth is she tried her best to create trouble in India while she was in power. She colluded with the terrorist groups operating in J&K and supported them during her time in power. Lets be realistic. Musharraf, Benazir and Nawaz Sharif have all aided and abetted terrorists for over a decade in I wouldn't be shedding any tears over them.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Who cares
by kawaljeet singh sandhu on Dec 28, 2007 03:54 AM  Permalink
who amongst the Pak rulers does'nt do this. Its just human to feel bad when someone is murdered. Do you think Musharff so caring for India??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Musharaf, ISI, Army, Al-qaeda & Taliban
by S on Dec 28, 2007 03:39 AM  Permalink 

This country is headed south until Pakistanis denounce Musharaf, ISI, Army, Al-qaeda & Taliban.

Hey God thoda buddhi aur Shakthi de yin pakis to sort their house in order!!

They have to fight for freedom & Independence all over again!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mushraff is the CEO of Terrorist Inc. in an Armani Suite.
by apjunkmail on Dec 28, 2007 03:11 AM  Permalink 

Mushraff is the CEO of Terrorist Inc. in an Armani Suite. He pretends to have switched sides, for what 12 billion $ of aid over 5 years%u2026. He and his ISI were caught red handed after 911, with no other choice he signed on to play pretend game for a pay than get bombed. All the weapons he bought with this aid are all to fight India not terrorism. After all he and ISI are Terrorism inc. ISI is comprised of Pakistan military officers moon lighting through. Point being Pak military and ISI are also connected. What he really wants? To Islamize south Asia in the long run, a reason why pakistan itself was created ,and in short run control of Afghanistan directly or its proxy Taliban.
The only confusing part is how this is in US interests.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Back fired
by Srinivasan Ashok on Dec 28, 2007 02:24 AM  Permalink 

When Bhutto was PM, Bleed India policy was conceived by the Pakistan ruling establishment. They tried to destabilize India through Kashmir and Punjab. Now it all back fired and Pakistan bleeding itself.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
To Mr. B. Raman
by on Dec 28, 2007 02:01 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

This is an open letter to Mr. B. Raman.
Dear Mr. Raman,
Hope you are reading this or you have been made aware of this. We are a great fan and admirer of SAAG. The sudden realization that it has been down (or hacked, as we positively think) has come as a shock and disappointment. We do hope that it will back up again and we earnestly hope that all the articles are safe somewhere. We are not sure how it happened, but it would be great if it come up again.
Regards,
Citizen of India


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:To Mr. B. Raman
by Rajaguru on Dec 28, 2007 09:08 AM  Permalink
Thanks,
B.Raman

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:To Mr. B. Raman
by Rajdeep Drohi on Dec 28, 2007 03:23 AM  Permalink
southasiaanalysis DOT org

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:To Mr. B. Raman
by Sameer Bhagwat on Dec 28, 2007 05:12 PM  Permalink
Thank you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Missing the obvious other angle !
by Unmai Vilambi on Dec 28, 2007 01:36 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Due to overwhelming antagonism that Benazir has earned during her regime, - in Zia loyalists, army officers and Al Qieda, Raman seems to have missed the obvious other angle of Musharraf himself being the perpetrator.

Benazir's assasination will only cause some trouble to him in some provinces. But, for Musharraf, facing trouble and holding power is much better than losing power and facing trouble !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Missing the obvious other angle !
by raj on Dec 28, 2007 02:35 AM  Permalink
that i think is our assumptions with uninformed sources or us thinking of such an angle. b. raman will have better sources and inside info, which normal people like you and me will not have privy to

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Taliban Business Connection?
by apjunkmail on Dec 28, 2007 01:34 AM  Permalink 

Mr Raman with UNOCAL past dealing with Taliban in late 90s in mind may be Chevron its current owner or their British proxies are out trying to do business with Taliban again. Please do some research on this, see if you find anythig.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 230 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message