Many of our Indians may remember at least from media that she (Benazir bhutto) is one among the many responsible for india's problems with terrorists in punjab and kashmir.India lost to the order of 10,000 citizens and several thousand jawans including former iron lady Indira Gandhi to terrorism.Being an open enemy of India only weak and chicken livered politicians can heap praise to her.We indians should be sorry for her but need not be sympethetic. Our politicians should express their stand are they with our enemies or they can be sympethetic and at least provide some relief to our own brothers who are dying in kashmir, punjab and naxal infested areas.
RE:cautious sympathy or silence required
by Vineesh Vedsen on Dec 27, 2007 11:39 PM Permalink
She had raised the Kashmir issue in the Islamic conference as the Paki PM and returned back empty handed as none of Iran Iraq had anything to do with her Kashmir greivances and none wanted to hamper long standing business relations with India. Iran and Iraq were least concerned even when Babri Masjid was razed in India.
RE:cautious sympathy or silence required
by balamurali ramachandran on Dec 27, 2007 11:47 PM Permalink
well said.the thing is our politians loose their guard whenever such thins happen and they are more concerned about others rather than our own people
RE:cautious sympathy or silence required
by Ramesh Krishnamurthy on Dec 28, 2007 12:13 AM Permalink
we need to respond with grace to a statesperson who is deceased in such a violent manner. so whats wrong if our PM responded in a decent manner.
RE:cautious sympathy or silence required
by robindra jana on Dec 28, 2007 12:37 AM Permalink
Our PM should have condemned the hanging of Saddam hussain a year ago, in same manner which it didn't. Where benazir had facilitated terrorism against India, saddam supported India on it's stand on Kashmir in Global paltform.
RE:cautious sympathy or silence required
by balamurali ramachandran on Dec 28, 2007 01:06 AM Permalink
responding to an enemy with grace is not overtly praising that person. perhaps you wont understand.Only people who lost their kins in terror (kashmir terror) will understand.Ask a pandit from kashmir. He will make you understand
RE:cautious sympathy or silence required
by Raju Saraswat on Dec 28, 2007 12:31 AM Permalink
People fail to understand the implications of this heinous act. These terrorists have spread their tentacles in India, Bangladesh and Nepal. They will celebrate their success today, they will be encouraged by it, and God knows when and where they will decide to strike again. I do not see any light at the end of this bloodied, dark and long tunnel. Nor do I see any reason why we should not condemn this act, per se.
RE:cautious sympathy or silence required
by proindian on Dec 27, 2007 11:52 PM Permalink
i believe we should help and restore democracy in pak. we will get 1 frnd(US) and a peaceful neighbourhood
Who was shocked in India other than the dirty politicians whom terrorism suits. Because of terrorism they move out in caravans of jeeps and cars burning poor mans blood in the transport.Those small time gundas who jumped into politics are seen with security and other vehicles. Their pets are also provided security at the cost of a common man who has to face only problems. Benazir was the perpetrator of terrorism in India. "As you sow so shall you reap". She was Pakistan PM during the period terrorism in Kashmir was exported by Pakistan. In the early days of terrorism i.e. 1989 she used to instigate by shouting on Pakistani radio and TV. Every evening she would call upon Kashmiri muslims to be part and parcel of the terrorism sponsored by her government.Every day she addressed the Kashmiris from Pak tv and radio,fueling hatred against India. Even appointment of governor of J&K was criticised by her via the pak government media.On the day Mr. Jagmohan took over as governor of J&K state, she shouted hoarse against him resulting in her delivering a premature baby the next day. She was all out and openly directing the Pak terrorists in Kashmir. She harvested what she had sown during her PMship of Pakistan.
RE:Indian response
by siddharth rahalkar on Dec 27, 2007 11:05 PM Permalink
that proves she was weak , stupid and anti indian. I am talking about opportunity India has now and least concerned abt her.
RE:Indian response
by someone on Dec 27, 2007 11:28 PM Permalink
Hello My Friends, People shouldn't forget that this beautiful lady was also called Mother of Taliban. As she created Taliban around 1994 and later Taliban took full control of Afghanistan. I still remember videos of Benajir around 1990 giving fiery speeches in Lahore and other cities in Pak about the Kashmiri Problem, and supporting them unconditionally. So it is 100% right to say "As U Sow, So U Reap", in Bangla we say "Jemon Karmo Temon Phal", means "As U Did your Karma, So is the Outcome". Once U danced with the Zihadis, if U say anything Otherwise, implies the Wait for Death. This shows how retarded is the mind of a Zihadi Illiterate, determined to follow Islam/Quran up to 100% achievement.
