Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 1129 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 26 | 27 | 28   Older >
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Muslims and Christians get United
by Kamal on Dec 26, 2007 05:44 PM  Permalink
First christians attacked an VHP activist, then the response will follow. Donot want to argue who is wrong or right, what made you conclude not to celebrate independence day and replubic day, you want to be anti-india, remeber you on moral basis get out of india first and become anti india, else hindus, muslims and christians infact all indians would not leave you.......

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Muslims and Christians get United
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 05:45 PM  Permalink
Religions are at war, follow it the first to kill will survive

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:RE:RE:Muslims and Christians get United
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 06:39 PM  Permalink
But crosses are not allowed in Saudi Arabia

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Why are situations arising where conversion becomes lucrative?
by Gautam Sinha on Dec 26, 2007 05:28 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

To all the people who are anti conversion one simple question - how is it that people are getting enticed by conversion?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Why are situations arising where conversion becomes lucrative?
by ralph nader on Dec 26, 2007 06:18 PM  Permalink
go bribe some poor guy and see--stop your philosphical noinsense

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Why are situations arising where conversion becomes lucrative?
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 07:24 PM  Permalink
How is that Taslima and Rusdiee write a book on their own religion

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Pawan Hansoti on Dec 26, 2007 05:21 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

There was a man called Osama Bin laden, he preached religious extremism and spoke the language of hate. The Muslims want after him like hell and chased him out. He now lives in the caves and mountains of Afghanistan running around to save his precious life.

While here in modern India, such religious extremists can preach and practice killing, looting, plunder, rape, burning and do what ever they like with minority communities and no law touches them. They are hero-worshipped and move around freely boasting about their criminal actions, one of them even gets elected as a Chief Minister of a state with a thumping majority.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Gautam Sinha on Dec 26, 2007 05:32 PM  Permalink
Correction about Osama - The Saudi Kingdom went after him as he was a threat to their power. Not Muslims. Many follow him. Later some foreign country bombed him into hiding. Yes this breed of hatred with the name Hindu on it is very unfortunate and is giving Hinduism a very bad name. They need to be curbed but then legal action is not going to take place as it needs political will.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 05:56 PM  Permalink
In war of religions u will side with non-hindus, Thanx for your tratorism

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 05:53 PM  Permalink
Thanx Demoniser

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 06:01 PM  Permalink
Why Indian Govt is banning certain books witten by people on their own religion

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:RE:RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Islamistruth on Dec 26, 2007 06:50 PM  Permalink
i amd going to write a book naming
"Rama exist or not?"
Whats ur opinion should govt ban it or not
I think this title hurted many hindus
But i am sorry

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 07:13 PM  Permalink
Hindu hurting is fine under sickularism even conversions hurt them r u going to stop it. Ram exits or not? but u know Shivaji Existed, Maharana Pratap existed, Raja Bhoj existed, Maharaja Ranjit Singh Existed, Guru Nanak...to Guru Gobind Singh Existed and shows of such great person will always exist as the shadow of Mohd exist, Osama Bind Laden (PBUH) exist

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 07:14 PM  Permalink
Ask whats the proof Osama Bin Laden exist

Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 07:25 PM  Permalink
Every hindu wants to see Ram, havethat question always on your mid you will see him if u try with all your heart.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Islamistruth on Dec 26, 2007 06:47 PM  Permalink
talk about what is present
talk about the terrorism done by VHP in Orrisaa
which is assaulting people and have became content of terror.
Talk about hw to eradicate them from country and send them to Nepal

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 07:16 PM  Permalink
Can u tell me whether Dawood Ibrahim exits or Osama Bin Laden exists

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 07:27 PM  Permalink
I hope your grand father fought for independenc e of this country

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Difference between Bin Laden and Modi.
by on Dec 26, 2007 11:48 PM  Permalink
This is what is ---guest becoming the host. u dont talk about your malicious intensions, barbarism and domination and give lectures about others? This is sorry state of the country

   Forward   |   Report abuse
media is biased
by kapil sharma on Dec 26, 2007 04:46 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

media basically frode he

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Conversion should be baned
by Truth on Dec 26, 2007 04:12 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Conversion should be completely baned in INDIA.
BJP always try to bring law of anti conversion ... but these psudo-secularist.. CONGRESS and COMMIS... poke there nose in this national issues...

very soon CONGRESS and COMMIS will be party of minority only as all HINDUES goint to vote for BJP>

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Conversion should be baned
by indriyo on Dec 26, 2007 06:02 PM  Permalink
The constitution defends the right of every citizen to practice his own religion. I agree, that there can be a dialogue on how to address the issue of conversion by money, but no one can ban religious conversion or inter-religious marriages, etc. Dont wish for these communal restrictions on individual liberty, you wont know what you would end up with. India will then turn into a Saudi Arabia!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Conversion should be baned
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 07:34 PM  Permalink
Saudi Arabia is too good a place to live as an extended state of USA.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Conversion should be baned
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 07:29 PM  Permalink
I prefer Kafirism

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Conversion should be baned
by Gautam Sinha on Dec 26, 2007 05:25 PM  Permalink
Why are you afraid of conversion so much? DO you think Hinduism will get eroded when some people follow practises of another religion? Please have a higher esteem of our religion. If you think conversion is carried out because these people are enticed with free gifts then better to let such people off as according to logic, their faith is being bought and we are better off without these people. If on the other hand these people are converting because they believe that is a new path to God then you are comitting a crime by stopping their bhakti. Either way you shouldn't stop conversion. Also against the logic that conversion is done to keep Indians in servility, well check history. The Hindu and Muslim maharajas yielded to East India company first before conversions were minimal.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Conversion should be baned
by Arvind Singh on Dec 26, 2007 05:48 PM  Permalink
Why books of some authors are banned

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Conversion should be baned
by kapil sharma on Dec 26, 2007 04:39 PM  Permalink
YES CONVERSION SHOULD E BAN
EVEN MAHATMA GANDHIJI WILL ALSO AGAINST CONVERSION
CONVERSION WASTAV ME ANGREJO KA HUME GULAM RAKHNE KE NEETY THE WHO KABHI DALITO KE UTHHAN KE NAHI SOCHTE THE UNHE TO KAVEL APNE SAMRAJYA KE CHINTA THE

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Missionariies
by suman on Dec 26, 2007 03:24 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

These missionaries started the violence by assaulting Swami Laxmanananda Saraswati, but when Hindus start retaliating, they run to media complaining about attack on minorities. The Indian media is dominated by Cristians and Leftists. Hence, it ignores all atrocities on Hindu and tries to make people emotional about minirities. When Christians/Muslims attack Hindus, media cleverly avoid any mention of identity of the attacker and victim. But when Cristians and muslims get a dose of their own medicine, media makes it a point to identify the community tag of each culprit and victim.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Missionariies
by Islamistruth on Dec 26, 2007 06:55 PM  Permalink
we muslims/ christians in indian also thing that we were getting detoriated in this country. But we feel proud to be indian.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Missionariies
by kapil sharma on Dec 26, 2007 04:41 PM  Permalink
yes great

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Missionariies
by on Dec 26, 2007 11:51 PM  Permalink
good buddy,,right comment

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Missionariies
by vox populi on Dec 26, 2007 04:13 PM  Permalink
well said :media never reported the attack on lady doctor by majlis in hyd.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:Missionariies
by kapil sharma on Dec 26, 2007 04:42 PM  Permalink
good keep it up this feeling
media is a bull shit


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
you kill hindu first and then get killed afterwards BUT blame only hindus
by rachita bholowalia on Dec 26, 2007 03:12 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

NONE appreciates,preaches violence except today
media,seculars,corrupt ngos,fraud humanrights commission etc.these fraud antinational riot oriented institutions only want HINDUS to be killed but without any counter action.
ANY RIOT VIOLENCE SPEAKS IN VOLUMES THAT IT WAS FIRST STARTED BY NON HINDUS.NO DOUBT ONE MUST NOT EXPECT FROM HINDUS TO REMAIN COWARDS IN THEIR OWN COUNTRY.
FIRST OF ALL WHY ANY CONVERSION TO ISLAM OR CHRISTIANITY?DOES IT HELP IN BONDING SOCIETY?NO NO NO--IF ONE CANNOT REMAIN LOYAL TO ONES RELIGION THEN ONE WOULD NOT BE LOYAL TO FAMILY SOCIETY NATION--if this is not a fact then tell
muslim fundamentalists,seculars not to say that
their ISLAM is the superior most--if they still
maintain so then they r bound to suffer for ever
THEN we talk of killing of those who intiated
process of any violence,riot--they must be killed since there is no other remedy.if we do not get help of humanrights commission then why
non hindus should get.
we gave pakistan,bangladesh to muslims as a GIFT
by so called great Gandhi and Nehru--so pls go
there and settle BURT FACT is that indian muslims have no place in these muslim nations.u
can recalla MOVIE namely GARAM HAWA where indian
muslim family of balarajsahni had to come back to india since they were not accepted by society
of pakistan--this can been verified even today.
reg christians,they have no one faith and why they should go for conversions--lalit kumar

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator
Total 1129 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 26 | 27 | 28   Older >
Write a message