This is the result of messing with muslims in india. Becuase most of the criminals come from muslim society. So if we mess up with them , they will do such kind of activities. so one solution is to let them do what they want and thats what congress is doing to maintain peace.
RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by Vasanth Srinivas on Dec 27, 2007 02:30 AM Permalink
So, what is the end for this ? Yesterday they claimed kashmir is theirs. Tomorrow they will do for Kerala, Karnataka, West Bengal. And we should grant them to maintain "PEACE". If this is what peace is, then it is true that Islam is a "Peace Loving Religion"
RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:42 AM Permalink
rightly said vasanth. as per rediff, Ziauddin Shaikh, a shopkeeper, says, 'Modi is a reality and Muslims cannot do anything about him. We have to live with him. I feel we all have to come to one understanding. If you cannot defeat Modi, then join him...'
thus strongman like modi forced even the minorities in guj to start thinking of going with majority. i wud like the change in their mindset in the whole of ind. there is equality for all in democracy but if more than equality is asked for minorities than its non-sense n has to b strictly dealt with.
RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by on Dec 27, 2007 05:43 AM Permalink
You are wrong for the "wrong reasons". Criminals can't be left in open ...but then again you cannot generalize against a specific religion either. I am a hindu and know of many Muslims more devout to our country India than some of the people posting here...just ask any person in an army uniform and you'll know what I am talking about...
RE:RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by Amol Thosar on Dec 28, 2007 04:57 AM Permalink
Don't compare Army men with other Muslims. They are Indians unlike majority of Muslim populace.
RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 02:33 AM Permalink
satyajeet..do you really have balls?how do you say this..you might be another porkistani here..ask that dawood to come to gujarat,,we will show how to burn the a** with out bomb..
RE:RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by Satyajeet Mohapatra on Dec 27, 2007 02:40 AM Permalink
i m not communal , am a secularist like CPI and congress men..and i believe in Muslim apeasement.There should be 30% reservation in jobs and education for muslims too.
RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 03:01 AM Permalink
if you are not communial then why you ask for reservations..study well and fight in merit..for that you should have some real balls..if you always think about terrorism then you will get reservations for cremations in gujarat..
RE:RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by Amol Thosar on Dec 28, 2007 04:55 AM Permalink
Muslim guy is right. Don't compare Islam with other religions. Islam will soon be extinct...!
RE:Kuchh nehi ho sakta
by Muslim on Dec 27, 2007 03:40 AM Permalink
Muslims are children of god. They should be given special privileges. It is written in Koran. Other religions are lowly. Do not compare Islam with other religion
Handling things Gandhiji's way when it comes to dealing with Pakistan, Terrorists and Mafias just DOES NOT WORK. They just don't have hearts, soul and brains.
We need BIG HAMMER like Sardar Patel, Narendra Modi and Shivaji to deal with these people.
RE:Philosophy of Gandhi doesn't work with Pakistan, Terrorists and Mafias
by Chirag Majmundar on Dec 27, 2007 02:23 AM Permalink
And few very advanced weapons too
Sikhs getting slaughered in thousands = A MISTAKE. Hindus getting killed in Kashmir = Political problem. Muslims getting killed by a few hundred = Holocaust. Poor protestors getting shot in WB under Left Govt = Misunderstanding. Banning Parzania in Gujarat = Communal. Banning Da Vinci Code and Jo Bole So Nihaal = Secular. Kargil Attack = Government failure. Chinese invasion in 1962 = Unfortunate betrayal. Reservations in every school and college on caste lines = Secular Reservations in Minority institutions = Communal. Fake encounters in Gujarat [Sohrabuddin] = BJP Communalism. Fake encounters under Cong-NCP in Maharashtra [Khwaja Younus] = Police atrocity. Talking about Hindus and Hinduism appeasment = Communal Talking about Muslims and Islam = Secular. BJP freeing 3 terrorists to save 100 Indian hostages = Shameful Congress freeing 4 militants to save just a life of one daughter of it minister in Kashmir [Rubina Sayed] = Natural Political dilemma. Attack on Parliament = BJP ineptitude Not hanging Afzal Guru the mastermind despite Supreme Court orders = Humanity and Political dilemma. BJP questioning Islam = Communal. Congress questioning Lord Rama existance = Clerical Error. Is there any end to Congress and it shameless supporters hypocrisy
RE:RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:06 AM Permalink
rightly said.
even musharraf can b better than cong/pseudo-seculars. coz mush can storm army into a place like lal masjid in pak, (unlike our hazarat bal masjid saga under cong rule). can kill the terrorist groups in masjid inspite of their leaders' request for making surrender. can call the madrassas as creating terror outfits. v can make musharraf as our pm (that way media and pseudo-seculars wud also b happy).
RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 02:30 AM Permalink
your words about congress pseudo securalism is accepted..but we dont need cartoon mental third rate fool like mushraff to do that job.India is not a banana republic to consider about funny creatures to lead the nation.he is better for that scum porkistan..we already got super star modi to work on that.he will bomb the terrorist a** soon .we are not concerned about pseudo secular to be happy..let they die with the mullahs..
RE:RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:36 AM Permalink
i agree with u. but my point is even person like mush can do cleansing in pak masjid, but here in ind, there is no one to even think of it. i hope modi like ppl prosper n do the job not merely in guj but in india as a whole.
RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:55 AM Permalink
taslima nasreena blaming islam= communal. karuna-andhi abusing Ram= his atheist nature.
RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:32 AM Permalink
further add. mf hussain painting nudity of hindu godddess= freedom of expression denish cartoon on mohammed and taslima nasreen writings on islam = hurting sentiments of minority.
RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by vipul saxena on Dec 27, 2007 02:39 AM Permalink
It was not congress which freed 4 militants. It was V P Singh government which was supported by both Communists and BJP. They freed dreaded militants for daughter of Mufti Mohammed Sayeed. and jaswant singh also escorted militants to Kandahar for Indian Airlines hijacked plane, again it was BJP government.
RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 03:11 AM Permalink
no..you are wrong..that is during rajiv gandhi government in the centre freed 4 militants...dont burn with the wrong facts here..by the way what is your answer for the rest dude...let me add this way..bjp freed 3 terrorist for 100 indians..but congress gave half the land of kashmir in afraid of fuc**ng muslim terrorist..why?
RE:RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by Muslim on Dec 27, 2007 03:43 AM Permalink
Kashmir is muslim area. That is why Congress gave it to Pakistan. Soon Muslims will divide india into small parts & take over. We are born to rule these Hindus. My blood boils when Hindu leaders give us orders.
RE:RE:congress and pseudo securalism
by vipul saxena on Dec 27, 2007 04:11 AM Permalink
no no prabha karan u r wrong again, check history please, it was V P singh government supported by BJP, just google it you will find it. v p singh government released those 4.
RE:That's why we need Shri Narender Modi!
by . on Dec 27, 2007 02:12 AM Permalink
rightly said. modi is the gutsy n brave person who does nt listen to the rubbish of the biased (n corrupt) media, pseudo-seculars (foreign funded). they r just here to suppress ind's growth n development.
as per rediff, Ziauddin Shaikh, a shopkeeper, says, 'Modi is a reality and Muslims cannot do anything about him. We have to live with him. I feel we all have to come to one understanding. If you cannot defeat Modi, then join him...'
thus modi forced even minority in guj to start thinking of going with majority. i wud like the change in their mindset in the whole of ind.
Everyone is saying to shoot Dawood and all other jehadi terrorists but what about indian court when the reports says that narco analysis test report cannot be used as evidence in the court of law. then what is the use of doing because then our intelligence agencies will boast of their calibre and the culprits will roam freely. so the soharabuddin case was rightly dealth with.
who can storm army into a place like lal masjid in pak, who can kill the terrorist groups in masjid inspite of their leaders' request for making surrender. who can call the madrassas as creating terror outfits. if v cant make modi pm (due to pseudo-secular's fears), then at least v can make musharraf as our pm (that way media and pseudo-secular wud also b happy).
RE:Dawood Ebrahim and Our Politician
by HaiHai Sourav on Dec 26, 2007 10:34 PM Permalink
Stee,
Well Said!
But Da-Wood funds almost every successful venture in India!
Da-Wood is (for all practical purposes) untouchable, invisible and invincible!
There is no party or politician in India who can take on Da-Wood!
And like everything wrong in India, the blame for this fiasco, also rests on the shoulders of the Congress party which is responsible for all wrongs committed in India for the first 40 years after Independence!!
