RE:Khatil NO1
by Rajagopal Sadagopan on Dec 24, 2007 07:33 PM Permalink
Mr Khan your argument that if anybody talks for hindu is a fanatic exposes your state of mind. Tell us in which country, especially in muslim country, a muslim fanatic or jahedies are even reprimanded leave alone getting panished. You first try to improve world wide immmage of your good religion by censuring a jahedi and adive other peace loving muslims not to shelter them. Tell your moulies not give a home for the jahedies in your mosques. You are making so much of noise when Sania takes a ad pic in Mecca majid but say nothing when the terrorists are sheltered in your places of worhsip, keeping hostages there and killing innocents. When a single woman like Taslima writes something critisising the ill treatment metted by the minority hindus in Bangaleadesh in the hands of moulies as if she is great force and making her a hero. But I have never seen or heard any good muslim saying something against the jahedies. Why dont you ask Sonia why she is delaying the execution of the person who attacted Indian Parliament, to act. Whether such a thing can happen anywhere else. Ponder over these and try to cange your mindset, if you are Indian
thanks to rediff to encourage secular article like this. all of u kindly boycot NDTV, if u belive in urself, its beyond caste, religion. this is ur IDENTITY
Thank you very much Mr Raman for putting this so nicely and so very correctly. If I get emails IDs for Barkha Dutt, Sheela Bhatt, Javed Akhtar, Shabana, Teesta etc. I would like to email this article to them.
RE:Very well said Mr. Raman
by amit jain on Dec 24, 2007 07:00 PM Permalink
Teesta is an ethnic Gujarati and the daughter of Atul Setalvad, a prominent Mumbai based lawyer, and Sita Setalvad, a rural crafts exponent.[8][9] She and husband Javed Anand have two children, Tamara and Jibran. She does not speak about even 1 Hindu victim.
RE:Very well said Mr. Raman
by amit jain on Dec 24, 2007 06:57 PM Permalink
Teesta's true name is Teesta Javed Anand Seetalvad. She is a jehadi woman, dont mistake her to be a hindu. She has two Muslim Paki kids. History has shown that educated and secular Muslims like Jinnah are most dangerous.
bcoz in a group of corrupt netas he stands firm with his nationlist view{not like sharad pawar who for the sake of chair,can do any thing}many of us thingks that he is honest in his aproch to the problems. he is having courage,&vision to solve it.he speaks mostly public views,directly communicates with them.he has the vision for strong india. thats why not only hindus but all the people will like him as the time pass
RE:RE:why modi appeals
by Hebbar R on Dec 24, 2007 06:36 PM Permalink
May be. But, that is what he should do as a CM of Gujarat. But, don't worry, soon he will also be in the Center, where he will start talking about the whole of India.
Anyway, the Congress is only worried of its vote bank. That way Modi is better, he worries about his state.
If the present rate of growth of Hindu & Muslim population continued, then after 120 years both the population will match. Then we don't have to take help of congress to defeat Modi.
RE:Indian Demography
by Ravi Yella on Dec 24, 2007 06:49 PM Permalink
Unfortunately that is the only event in your life time and next that you can wait for. Mean while there is a possibility that people like Sanjay Gandhis may also take birth. Better guard your self against your precious freedom of expression then.Otherwise you know history what happened.
RE:Indian Demography
by Mohammed on Dec 24, 2007 06:25 PM Permalink
No 120 years buddy.... Another 50 years enough... Insha Alah, I want to see that before I die...
RE:Indian Demography
by vg on Dec 24, 2007 08:06 PM Permalink
NAZI TERRORISM STARTED THE 2ND WORLD WAR.....AND WE KNOW WAHT HAPPENED....ISLAMIC TERRORISM HAS STARTED THE THIRD...
RE:Indian Demography
by human on Dec 24, 2007 07:10 PM Permalink
We know you are fast breeder reactor... coz not one wife, 10 wifes and use your own children for breeding... continuous breeding. no other constructive work.
RE:Indian Demography
by on Dec 24, 2007 11:05 PM Permalink
The world's first terrorist himself said "Na Musa Na Isa" that Islam will last only 1400 years, that means by 2032 if one goes by the actual 1400 years. But the skewed brain said that a year is only 354 days long, hence by that calculation that evil cult end should have been in 1979. Did it happen, don't say No before you examine the facts. In Nov 1979 an Iranian Muslim group aptly named Shakthi stormed the tomb of 360 Shivling idols and shot indiscrimnately over 1000 foolish followers. What started in 1979 will end by 2032. So don't daydream.
We need a strong leader. After Aurangzeb, unfortunately we didn't have a strong administrator. Modi has potential of strong administrator, but his religion will not allow him to become more aggressive.
RE:Modi is a strong Administrator
by saturn on Dec 24, 2007 08:39 PM Permalink
Yeah. You mention Aurangzeb. He was the one who killed his own brothers Dara, Suja and Murad for their kingdom. He was the one who imprisoned his father Shahjehan till life.
THAT is your culture and you will never get better leaders than Aurangzeb.
But remember, what Shivaji Maharaj did to you, now Modi will do!
RE:Modi is a strong Administrator
by khan on Dec 24, 2007 06:02 PM Permalink
Yes and Hindus what abt u u have one leader and that too a terrorist who is the nut case here
RE:Modi is a strong Administrator
by Amar Desai on Dec 24, 2007 06:49 PM Permalink
thats wrong, hindu as a community has emerged as a strong educated, proffesional race in the word. I am sure you dont know meaning of these words. These attributes in hindus is enough to demolish you not only from India but from entire world.
What do you expect a brahmin to say about a non-brahmin who is brain washed from birth and lives his entire life hoping to be born as a brahmin in the next life. This Hindu thing is a new concept isn't it Braman, for thousands of years it was brahmin supremacy, when was it that you included suthras and the untouchables. Braman, you can say you are a Hindu and hold your head high when you don't put obstacles to your children and grand children marrying dalits without dowry. Braman, you can say you are a hindu and hold your head high when anyone who is a hindu including dalits can be priests if they choose to be so. Braman you can be a hindu and hold your head high when you do not charge people to see idols and do not charge them even more to pour ghee or milk on the idols.
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Amar Desai on Dec 24, 2007 06:51 PM Permalink
Mahakavi, the things you are talking about used to exisy before 2000 years. Nothing like this exist now. grow up or you will be left behind. there are no distinctions now i have millions of example where a brahmin and shudra exists side by side in a friendly manner.
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by human on Dec 24, 2007 07:23 PM Permalink
Why the he*k you bring in brahminism jollydoss, either you are talking what your pasteur told you in the church Or you are dreaming of something that never existed.
As some others pointed out to you alaredy, there are umpteen number of upper casts within hindus... do you think a gowda marries a dalit even today?Do you think gowdas marry vokkaligas in karnataka? Both are not brahmins though. Similarly in tamilnadu .. do Nadaars marry theyvars ? Ask them they will tell you rightly. What rubbish you are talking here. There are many brahmins who married dalits in the past and even now some do love marriages.
Todays polity, show us a single brahmin leader who is ruling a state or even part of it in india? 40-50% of brahmins are backward financially today. Did it show they are financially well off ?? Talk truth or else stay calm. Dont poison the hindu religion further.
RE:RE:RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Calspadeaspade on Dec 24, 2007 07:56 PM Permalink
Nothing wrong with that. religion has to evolve with time and place. we can not keep holding on to middle age customs. Hindu evolving to a better modern attitude is better than some one converting out of slavish mind and doing the bidding for their masters. This is how Turkish slave converts behaved. They behaved worse than their masters.
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Calspadeaspade on Dec 24, 2007 07:49 PM Permalink
What can you expect from a rice Christian?. he is just vomitting whatever his master had brain washed him with. When Pope John Paul visited India some Dalit Christians complained to Pope how they had to use a separate Burial ground an how they were not permitted in the church ment for slightly higher caste converts. This idiot Mahakavi is just going on an on wit his obsscession. Moderator please dont mark this message as abuse.
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Calspadeaspade on Dec 24, 2007 06:49 PM Permalink
Ya . Mahakavi is obscessed with caste and Brahmins. He needs that weapon to whip Hindus. HInduism is here to stay. It may even spread to his master's countries now.
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Joyee Funee on Dec 24, 2007 06:00 PM Permalink
Mahakali First of all Mr. Modi is OBC "GHANCHI" community which is even less than 1% in Gujarat and backward like any other community Still he is favorite of all Hindus despite of thier caste and creed
Also note Untouchability issues are old and discard it from your head now (also please give me list of total no. of untouchable community and % of it )
If For long Brahmin supremecy ruled then Why there is no mention of Single Brahmin King in history ? Why there is no mention of Single Rich Brahmin trader of Businessman in history ? Why it is belived (Lakshmi and Saraswati does not stay togather) Why Brahmin also allowed to write constitution by Dr. Ambedkar (60 years back When they were still considered superior according to u) Is dowry system is in Hindu community only ? (recently we saw CNN IBN expose of Dowry in UP demanded by Muslims) also the dowry system has reduced from the society
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Joyee Funee on Dec 24, 2007 06:20 PM Permalink
Mr. Mahakali There are not a single god in History who was born Brahmin All the Hindu Gods are either Kshatriya or Rajput
So may I Know why would Modi like to become Brahmin and instead Not Rajput of Kashtriya to protect Hinduism
RE:RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Joyee Funee on Dec 24, 2007 06:33 PM Permalink
Mahakali As u said Today even Brahmins are not caring much about it Then why are u bringing and writing such issues which u r saying stupid beleief and todays Modern Hindu also regard it as baseless
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Gopal on Dec 24, 2007 08:35 PM Permalink
Hope you understand who a true 'brahmin' is - its not decided by birth (as being done by Govt. of India certificates now). He is the one who renounces all pleasures and lives each day on alms (food) with the sole aim of attaining mukthi. He is not allowed to even store food for the next day. By that definition, no one is or can be a brahmin in today's highly materialistic world. So, if Modi were to aspire to become a brahmin, then so be it. It only speaks highly of his thinking.
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Mandar S. Sant on Dec 24, 2007 06:30 PM Permalink
Get your history lessons corrected. At least about Peshwas, Marathas and English Presidency.
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by Joyee Funee on Dec 24, 2007 06:28 PM Permalink
Dear Mahakali One more thing marrying Dalit or not In todays time Marriage is matter of personal like of the copuple getting married and caste has nothing to with it, in todays time even Hindus are marrying to muslims (Priyanka Todi, Gauri Khan, Wife of Amir Khan) Why the hell u want to marry to Higher caste, Dont u like ur own caste , dont u like to marry ur own caste people and bring them forward U really suffer from Brahmincal fobia and seeks their approval to become higher caste citizen
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by BigDesi on Dec 24, 2007 07:00 PM Permalink
Shut the f**k up with your usual ranting of Brahmins. We have heard this for centuries. Brahimins are least priviliged section of Hindus.
Other than foreign horde, you castiests are top most Hindu enemies. Give up your castiests mindset and join greatest bunch on earth i.e. your Hindu community. We don't have any place for ANY type of casteists. Stop talking about your castes and states.
RE:Braman, say you are a brahman and hold your head high
by amit jain on Dec 24, 2007 07:03 PM Permalink
All non Muslims are proud of Modi, only half skins are complaining from Pakistan. More people were killed in Moradabad, Bhagalpur, Meerut riots, but none will blame Gandhi family. Shame on English media, full of leftist balls.
by Modi's victory.......we r reminded of prithviraj's chauhan's victory against Mohammed Ghori (Sonia Gandhi)....... inspite of jaichands (teesta setalvad / prannoy roy / barkha dutt etc.)........
RE:Modi's victory reminds me of Prithviraj Chauhan's victory........inspite of all odds........
by Mohammed Kureshi on Dec 24, 2007 05:53 PM Permalink
Ghori was focussed,Modi too. Ghori was unmarried,Modi too. Ghori was brave, Modi too. Ghori conqured new empire, Modi too.
RE:RE:Modi's victory reminds me of Prithviraj Chauhan's victory........inspite of all odds........
by human on Dec 24, 2007 07:27 PM Permalink
Ghori demolished many hindu temples... Modi didn't and willn't do for mosques.
RE:Modi's victory reminds me of Prithviraj Chauhan's victory........inspite of all odds........
by Gopal on Dec 24, 2007 08:38 PM Permalink
Modi is an elected representative in a civilized worled and Ghori, err--hmm..oops..
RE:India needs a strong leader!
by pagan on Dec 24, 2007 05:50 PM Permalink
U havent heard of Chatrapathi..Modi is not a Aurangzeb. He is is any..he is like Chatrapathi.
RE:RE:RE:India needs a strong leader!
by sanjay choudhry on Dec 24, 2007 06:27 PM Permalink
These people just want to loot your wealth and capture your women. Be careful of them.
