This word does not exist in any of our religious scriptures, Vedas, Puranas, Upnishads, etc. It is what the muslim arabs called us as people living across sindhu. IT is also said that the word has some derogatory meaning in Arabian language. Our religion was called as Vedic or Sanatana Dharma. We are all Bharatis though we call ourselves as Indians, the name given by the british. Why???? do we give more importance to the names given by outsiders like Hindu by Arabs or India by British. More so when these outsiders actually slaughtered us or enslaved us. Do you have the answer?????????????????????
RE:Modi
by SI on Dec 26, 2007 11:33 PM Permalink
Even hitler was victorious before his final down fall. There is famous saying "every D0gg has its day". It fits very well to D0GG like Modi.
RE:Modi
by Ekalavya Krishnan on Dec 27, 2007 09:00 AM Permalink
You are right the female Dog and it's pup has already lost in Gujarat. (I am sure Maino appointed censors would not allow the feminine form to be used!)
RE:RE:Modi
by Ekalavya Krishnan on Dec 27, 2007 09:03 AM Permalink
SI i heard you calling up the Pope to complain about his permanent envoy in india being called a female dog?
As the years go by and common man gets more educated and AWARE he or she will realize India is the land of HINDUISM where are other religion or sects are welcome as long as they agree to live free UNDER THE HINDIISM umbrella and not attempt to take the umbrella down . If they cannot then they should get out or convert back to Hinduism to a religion not hostile to Hinduism like Buddhism .
RE:is islam humane
by Aryaputra on Dec 25, 2007 08:55 PM Permalink
You can disagree with what Krishna said in the Bhagvad Geeta & reinterpret them in your own light. Nobody is going to torch you.
What about Islam? The prophet by saying that his was the last word of God devilishly underlined the fact that the Quran is not amenable to change. With the result that today a Muslim is nothing but a follower of the Quran. Take away the Quran & Islam vanishes. Indeed it is this extreme insecurity & an inferiority complex generated from the teachings of a demented ideology which causes Muslims to behave the way they do.
RE:RE:is islam humane
by syed immamudin on Dec 26, 2007 11:44 PM Permalink
fools talks or writes like you first of all know; islam means peace and quran means reciteable book or it means furqhan which means the criteria to judge right and wrong. you mr. ignorant if you critisize quran or islam show one single verse of quran which is against humanity, muslim are just followers, followers may also have there own action which you cannot attribute it to quran or islam, i donot want to defame any other religion when things are going worst i have to point out that in hindustan that are many discrimination and injustices were practised like sathi system,widow cannot marry,untouchablity,a divided india with hundred and thousands of rulers fighting each other and it was muslims who united hindustan into one after ashoka they ruled india for more than 800years that alone is enough to reveal that they carried india with more justice than any other ruler, if they were not humble,humane,god fearing,justice to all it would not have been possible for them to rule such a vast land for more than 8 century and we indian fell to the prey of britain idelogy divide and rule, dear indians india has come to our hand just 50 years ago so whatever you do shall reflect after 50 or 100 years so do not jump out with deceived truth, when we are not divided we win or else we loose
RE:Modi is Kalki Avtar.
by Ekalavya Krishnan on Dec 26, 2007 02:29 PM Permalink
Idiot they were not created (shows your insidious mind). Of course they took avatar to exterminate earlier versions of Cult leaders- cult leaders like Raksha Ravanan and Kamsan. And to instruct faltering Hindus like Arjuna to uphold Dharma by ruthlessly exterminating the kaurva clan. Hopefully Modi will be instrumental in starting the destruction of the two most evil desert cults
the electronic media who r totally biased and pseudo-secular hindu bashing, and the eng press who r agents of US and UK. dont watch such channels which has no credibility at all. let their trp shrink down to nil. also same for the eng press. go and support for vernacular press of any religion whether of north or south indian language.
Most of the English kournalists are educated in Convent schools-where Christianity is force fed. As it happens in the convents, femal reporters are restricted from sporting Bindi on their fore head. They are exposed to case studies and lessons that decry India and Hinduism in journism schools and media houses. Therefore they have a fixed anti Hindu prism in their reporting. It is combined with elite and class arrogance that makes them reject the grassroots leaders like Modi, Lalu, Yadhav, Mayavati, Uma Bharati, etc. They are relatively OK with urbane, suave and elite leaders like Chandra Babu, Navin Patnaik, Vasundara Raje, Sheial Dixit. Recently a reputed journalist of NDTV was asking Arun Jaitley how could a urban suave person like you become friend of Narendra Modi?. It doesnt take Sonia to task for Muslim appeasement-such as Ram dont exist affidavit, Taslima ill treatment, 15% planning allocation, etc. Sonia says something sensational and half a dozen of her spoke persons come give varied explanations appealing to differet vote banks. Media doesnt have the fire to challenge Sonia hit and run politics. Because MEDIA PERSONS WORSHIP HER WHITE SKIN AD ITALIAN ORIGINS.
I dont know why everyone seems to be ignoring the growth in Gujrat over the past 5 years, everyone seems to be hell bent on attributing Modi victory to hindutva. Only speech i heard of Modi where he talked abt something other than development and Sonia bashing, was when he mentioned Sohrabuddin the terrorist. But why is media relating Sohrabuddin to islam?? He is a terrorist, thats all. Had he metnioned some name like Ramesh, Joseph, or Navjot, would u call that communal too?? Its something to do with the mindset of media and lot of people that the moment they hear some muslim name, they think the speaker is communal
RE:Modi as PM
by Jarnail singh on Dec 25, 2007 02:33 PM Permalink
Dipak you are suffering with the same disease which is giving mental trouble to mr. muhammad ali. it is "intolerance". if different animals can live in one jungle how human being can not live in one country? do animals are better then us? if you think that all problems will be sorted out with exchange of population then you are wrong. why Nepal is suffering with all kind of problems. it is entirely a hindu state. one religion one country is no guarantee of peace and progress. secondly when british empire decided to bifurcate india into two countries exchange of population was not on agenda. britishers decided the borders on the basis of muslism and hindu dominated areas not on the population. our leaders did not thought about exchange of population. when riots broke just before the partition then in panic people started leaving their places to go where the dominance of their religion is. it was a criminal act of britishers. they want to leave india at the earliest. this is why they do not think about the exchange of populatio and result was bloodbath of lacs of hindu, sikh, muslim. before the partition people thought terms of india and pakistan would be similar to america and canada. but that bloodbath and pakistan military rulers adventurism made us enemies. mr. bose hatred against anyone needs to condemn. just because of mr. ali and your kind of thinking the ordinary man is suffering.
RE:RE:Modi as PM
by mohammed ali on Dec 25, 2007 02:52 PM Permalink
Jarnail Singh, I am not an extremist. I agree with your views in principle that a man is judged before GOD for his deeds alone.
