Most of the English Journalists are educated in Convent schools-where Christianity is force fed. As it happens in the convents, female reporters are restricted from sporting Bindi on their fore head. They are exposed to case studies and lessons that decry India and Hinduism in journalism schools and media houses. Therefore they have a fixed anti Hindu prism in their reporting. It is combined with elite and class arrogance that makes them reject the grassroots leaders like Modi, Lalu, Yadhav, Mayavati, Uma Bharati, etc. They are relatively OK with urbane, suave and elite leaders like Chandra Babu, Navin Patnaik, Vasundara Raje, Sheila Dixit. Recently a reputed journalist of NDTV was asking Arun Jaitley how could an urban suave person like you become friend of Narendra Modi?. It doesnt take Sonia to task for Muslim appeasement-such as Ram dont exist affidavit, Taslima ill treatment, 15% planning allocation, etc. Sonia says something sensational and half a dozen of her spoke persons come give varied explanations appealing to different vote banks. Media doesnt have the fire to challenge Sonia hit and run politics. Because MEDIA PERSONS WORSHIP HER WHITE SKIN & ITALIAN ORIGINS.
A local leader wins an assembly election in a small stste in the indian union & the 'hard-up' of victory party bjp, is going to town over it !! This shows the present state of the so-called national party the bjp !! what a laugh !
RE:every dog has its day.
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 02:52 AM Permalink
you scum..where do you came from?first chage your name..dont spoil tamilians image by giving your shi* views..for what you laugh in the a$* with out sense..which party is called national party then congress?..fool see here
powerful opposition in jharkand(single largest party but the power sick congress is running a drama government) karnataka(single largest party)himachal pradesh-Going to capture the power soon.
congress: Andhrapradesh delhi manipur
1/5 of india
currently running a puppet central government with 100 of regional parties..
RE:every dog has its day.
by Tamil Arasan on Dec 27, 2007 04:19 AM Permalink
You rss paid scum,who is destroying hinduism with your hate propaganda.Go & get an vhp name atleast, instead of using the name of a great tamilian warrior Prabhakaran & disgracing tamils all over the world.Have you forgotton the thrashing you goons got in tamilnadu,so soon?
RE:RE:every dog has its day.
by prabha karan on Dec 27, 2007 08:41 AM Permalink
you karunidhi paid shi* head mental fool...go and bark behind karunnidhi's a@@..wait you all will soon thrown out by bjp,aiadmk,and vijaykanth party..until then sllep with your shi*
to all the hindus on this board..i see many of telling that modi is the savior of hindus and he is the one to lead hindus.. all that is fine but we need to remember each one of is a soldier in our fight to make hinduism the the most beautiful way of life in the world..we should not be depending on just one man in this fight..we are all part..lets all walk the way shown by people like modi,vivekananda,dayananda saraswati... We are soldiers of Sanatana Dharma...
Please understand that we are all Indians not necessarily Hindus.
If Mr.Modi's victory is the pride for Hindus of the world. What happened to the Hindus in Sri Lanka????
What Modis and Advanis are doing to protect the Hindus in Sri Lanka??????
Any religion in a matter is a personal belief. It is between Him and His God. Not for politics.
Never ever confuse and mix religion and politics.
Wrongs in Catholic organisations should be revealed to the public and culprits should be punished.
Babri Masjid demolishers also should be punished.
Fake encounters should be stopped at any cost.
No organisation or individual have the right to destroy other's properties, whether it is a Temple, Mosque, Church or Gurdwara etc.
Be sensible Indians to decided which is right or wrong. Wrong is a wrong and right is a right. Whomesoever doing wrong should be punished, whether it is Narendrabhai Modi, or Sonia.
Let us be a human being. Not religious terrorists.
RE:Proud to be Indian rather than discussing abuse
by Ekalavya Krishnan on Dec 26, 2007 02:31 PM Permalink
Quote "Please understand that we are all Indians not necessarily Hindus" . Anyone who owes allegience to an outsider cannot be termed Bharatvasis they are guests who can be turned out at anytime.
Sangh Parivar goons continuing their naked dance with their victory in Gujarat.
Sangh Parivar rioters attack churches in several towns in Kondhmal district of Orissa on Christmas celebrations. Hindu extremists are increasingly targeting middle class churches in cosmopolitan centers.
Sangh Parivar not believe in Democracy. It's cadres attacked on a big rally of CPI(M) at Jind, Haryana on 26.12.2007. BJP is a communal party, which is dividing people on the basis of religion and caste for gaining political power.
Sangh Parivar earlier attacked Don Bosco students including adivasi, priests and a sister attacked at Vadodara on 19.12.2007.
RE:Sangh Parivar goons continuing their naked dance with their victory in Gujarat.
by Danny Rathore on Dec 26, 2007 11:01 PM Permalink
there were no students in the group which was attacked from Don Bosco. Also, the school is in city what were they doing in villages....conversions....but none of the reports tell us about to reason for clash.....we jst have one side of the story
RE:Sangh Parivar goons continuing their naked dance with their victory in Gujarat.
by Ekalavya Krishnan on Dec 26, 2007 02:09 PM Permalink
Having been driven out of the other blog this timid, 'laid' paulian is spreading his venom here.
This word does not exist in any of our religious scriptures, Vedas, Puranas, Upnishads, etc. It is what the muslim arabs called us as people living across sindhu. IT is also said that the word has some derogatory meaning in Arabian language. Our religion was called as Vedic or Sanatana Dharma. We are all Bharatis though we call ourselves as Indians, the name given by the british. Why???? do we give more importance to the names given by outsiders like Hindu by Arabs or India by British. More so when these outsiders actually slaughtered us or enslaved us. Do you have the answer?????????????????????
RE:Hindu?
by stav on Dec 26, 2007 06:13 AM Permalink
But Santhan Dharma is pantheistic unlike modern hinduism, any division is negated in advaitic philosophy. When we label ourself, we divide the labeled from the the rest, hence it is contradiction with the precepts of Sanathan dharma. We have screwed up hinduism, lets not screw up Sanathan dharma.
RE:Hindu?
by KALKI on Dec 26, 2007 07:06 AM Permalink
Thanks for enlightening me. Spreading more knowledge will only help, not screw up anything. Tell more of whatever you know. Remove ignorance. I am still learning.
RE:Hindu?
by stav on Dec 26, 2007 08:20 AM Permalink
"outsider","insider","arabs","hindus" all these are labels. We are all one, that is what i understand.
This word does not exist in any of our religious scriptures, Vedas, Puranas, Upnishads, etc. It is what the muslim arabs called us as people living across sindhu. IT is also said that the word has some derogatory meaning in Arabian language. Our religion was called as Vedic or Sanatana Dharma. We are all Bharatis though we call ourselves as Indians, the name given by the british. Why???? do we give more importance to the names given by outsiders like Hindu by Arabs or India by British. More so when these outsiders actually slaughtered us or enslaved us. Do you have the answer?????????????????????
