Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 361 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Chartered Accountant in Chennai writing about politics and religion in Gujarat!
by anir on Dec 26, 2007 12:26 PM  Permalink 


Only Sheela can be so innovative.

May be rediff is training him under Pro-fool Bidwai.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Divide and rule Trick is OLD has not much future
by apjunkmail on Dec 26, 2007 11:25 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Divide and rule Trick is OLD and can only work so may times, people have caught up to it. imo it will no longer work in future to return its past results. India is 80% hindu any party that creates its platform on undermining the 80% interests will have increasingly tougher task in future until it gets obliterated. Party of the future will appease the 80% hindus of however many fractions.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Divide and rule Trick is OLD has not much future
by Sam on Dec 26, 2007 11:34 AM  Permalink
well said!!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
SOME FACTS
by Pt. KARTIKAY PANDEY on Dec 26, 2007 09:35 AM  Permalink 

1. MUSLIMS IN THE INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT, HAD HINDU FOREFATHERS, THIS HAS NOW BEEN PROVED BY GENETIC ANALYSIS. WHAT MAKES THEM HATE THE RELIGION OF THEIR ANCESTORS, SO BADLY, IS BEYOND COMPREHENSION.
2. IF THESE HINDUS DECIDE FOR A HOMECOMING, THIS WHOLE RGION WILL BE FREE FROM ALL TURMOILS.
3. MUSLIMS ARE SAFEST IN INDIA, DUE TO TOLERANT AND PEACE-LOVING HINDU MAJORITY.
4. TO BELEIVE THAT GOD SEND HIS 'ONLY' SON JUST 2 THOUSAND YRS. BACK AND HIS 'ONLY' PROPHET, 15 HUNDRED YRS. BACK, TO SALVAGE MANKIND, IS NOTHING BUT PURE LIE AND MANIPULATION. THESE STORIES SEEM TO SUGGEST THAT GOD CAME AFTER MAN, AND THEY QUESTION THE EXISTANCE AND SUPREMACY OF GOD, WHICH CANNOT BE ACCEPTABLE.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Forget Muslim issue for a second. What about banning of Da Vinci Code by different States even after Indian Supreme Court ruled that the movie can't be banned?
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 26, 2007 07:45 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


Forget Muslim issue for a second. What about banning of Da Vinci Code by different States even after Indian Supreme Court ruled that the movie can't be banned?

PSUEDOS DELIBERATELY BANNED THE MOVIE IN ANDHRA, PUNJAB, TAMIL NADU TO PANDER XTIAN ZEALOTS WHICH WAS COMPLETELY AGAINST INDIAN JUDICAL VERDICT.

NOT A SINGLE PSUEDO PROTESTED.

Has any Western Counrty banned Da Vinci Code?

WHY WESTERN PRESS DID NOT GIVE ELABORATE COVERAGE TO THIS AND TERMED IT AS PANDERING TO XTIAN FUNDAMENTALISM?

Its things like these, blatant pampering of minorities, but exact opposite position in case of Hindus which has destroyed Secularism in India.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Forget Muslim issue for a second. What about banning of Da Vinci Code by different States even after Indian Supreme Court ruled that the movie can't be banned?
by stav on Dec 26, 2007 09:00 AM  Permalink
You have the right to ask for freedom of speech, you have stand by this in truthfulness. That means you stand by M.F. Hussain and Taslima and Davinci Code with the same attitude. Otherwise you are a hypocrite.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
Last nail in the coffin of Psuedo-Secularism will be 15% Muslim Budgetory allocation.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 26, 2007 03:02 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


Last nail in the coffin of Psuedo-Secularism will be 15% Muslim Budgetory allocation.

NOBODY , NOT EVEN A HARDCORE CPIM SUPPORTER WILL ACCEPT THIS.

THIS WILL BECOME BIGGER SUCCESS THAN AYODHYA RAMJANMABHOOMI MOVEMENT.

WHY WILL RICH, MIDDLE CLASS MUSLIMS BE PAID MONEY, FACILITIES AT THE COST OF POOR HINDUS?

WHY MUSLIM SPECIFIC BUDGET?

IS IT SECULARISM? WHY MUSLIM APPEASEMENT IN A SECULAR COUNTRY?

Roughly 28-30% of Indians are BPL.

Muslim pop is roughly at 14-15%. Neither all Muslims are BPL.

This means, majority of poor, BPL families are from Hindus.

Why then Muslims demanding secial muslim budgeting, economic drive, job quota for MUSLIMS.

HOW CAN A SECULAR STATE TAKE PLANS BASED ON RELIGIOUS IDENTITY?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Last nail in the coffin of Psuedo-Secularism will be 15% Muslim Budgetory allocation.
by marat on Dec 26, 2007 03:15 AM  Permalink
Secular fundamentalism would give rise to Hindu fundamentalism, which would in turn trigger Islamic fundamentalism. Would the secularists, both within the media and the polity, introspect this issue in greater depth at least now?
Hence Vp sing released the Great vethal(BJP) in 1989 that is why the people of india is addicted to facism its a shame that gandhiji born in gujrath



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Last nail in the coffin of Psuedo-Secularism will be 15% Muslim Budgetory allocation.
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 26, 2007 07:14 AM  Permalink

WHEN GANDHI WAS ALIVE, MUSLIMS DID NOT SUPPORT HIM. HENCE THE COUNTRY WAS PARTITIONED.

MUSLIM'S "LOVE" FOR GANDHIJI WAS A STRATEGIC SHIFT AFTER PARTITION.

THAT TOO, THEY NEVER SUBSCRIBED TO GANDHIAN VALUES- SARVA DHARMA SAMBHAV. MUSLIMS, WHETHER ELITE OR MULLAH- CHOSE NEHRUVIAN SECULARISM WHICH WAS AN IMPORT FROM THE WEST.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Fact is: there is no principle behind today's secularism, unlike (say) Nehru's
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 26, 2007 02:58 AM  Permalink 


Fact is: there is no principle behind today's secularism, unlike (say) Nehru's.

Muslims are being rallied religiously, and Hindus are being divided politically along caste.

PSUEDO-SECULARISM CANNOT SURVIVE BASED ON CASTEIST POLITICS.

HINDUTVA GROUPS WILL INFILTRATE THESE CASTE GROUPS (RATHER DOING IT HUGELY AND SUCCESSFULLY AS WE SPEAK), AND RAISE PEOPLE FROM BOTTOM UP.

Take the example of Modi (or Uma Bharati or so many others) himself. He is from socalled "backward caste".

HINDU GROUPS WORKED FOR MANY MANY DECADES AND REACHED THESE GROUPS. THUS WE ARE SEEING RISE OF UMA BHARATI, NARENDRA MODI.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Psuedo secularism has been deeply flawed
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 26, 2007 02:47 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


Psuedo secularism has been deeply flawed. Just consider this simple example:

There is an unused mosque inside Calcutta Airport runway, which calcutta high Court has ORDERED TO REMOVE AS ITS A SECURITY RISK.

CPIM is NOT removing this unused mosque FOR MUSLIM VOTE, rather spending 100s of Crores to acquire additional land and build a parallel runway.

BUT THE SAME CPIM WANTS TO DESTROY RAMA SETU.

ITS THIS TYPE OF EXTREME APPEASEMENT AS WELL AS DELIBERATE HURT TO HINDUS HAVE BEEN CONTINUING IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM.

NO WONDER, ITS FAILING COMPLETELY.

CPIM's surrender to Islamic fundamentalism over Taslima has taken the last mask off from CPIM's rationale of secularism.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Psuedo secularism has been deeply flawed
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 26, 2007 02:54 AM  Permalink

* ITS THIS TYPE OF EXTREME APPEASEMENT OF MUSLIMS AS WELL AS DELIBERATE HURT TO HINDUS HAVE BEEN CONTINUING IN THE NAME OF SECULARISM.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 361 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message