Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 771 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
EC is biased towards Congress and shows open hatred of BJP
by Sandeep sharma on Dec 22, 2007 10:33 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

EC has really shown its bias in ths case. There was nohing in Modi's speech wich can be seen as an appeal to caste or communal feelings for securing votes. It was congress which started the issue of Sohrabuddin with an eye on Muslim votes.Modi in his reply justified his killing as he was a terrorist. Sonia Gandhi introduced communal angle in this by dragging Muslims. The person who should have been issued show-cause notice was Sonia gandhi, But EC oblized her by issuing notice to Modi. Job of EC is to conduct polls in a free and fair manner but it has made Gujarat poll unfair. Polls will not be free as EC is working to oblize Sonia Gandhi.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:EC is biased towards Congress and shows open hatred of BJP
by Shirodkar on Dec 22, 2007 10:43 PM  Permalink
u have answered ur own question.
"Modi in his reply justified his killing as he was a terrorist" - Gujarat govt has submitted in court that they are against any form of encounter killing. now Modi goes to justify it.
This is just goes to show that Modi has no regard for the law of the land.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:EC is biased towards Congress and shows open hatred of BJP
by Sandeep sharma on Dec 22, 2007 10:51 PM  Permalink
Mr Shirodkar,

You seem to be the author of circular logic cause you are taking this out of context and try to wry it. Your interpretation demonstrate your tawdry comprehension since it digress for the fact that narendra bhai was addressing a rally wherein he concur that Gujarat will have zero tolerance towards Jihadi's.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
hypocrisy of BJP
by Shirodkar on Dec 22, 2007 10:31 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Akalis have put a portrait of Bindranwale in Golden Temple. BJP says nothing. But in Gujarat they claim to be the ultimate saviour against terrorism.
Advani goes to Pakistan, falls at the feet of Jinnah and goes to the extent of calling Jinnah(a person who divided India into 2 nations based on religion) a "secular" man. Any other party would have thrown such a person out but what does BJP do? they make him the prime ministerial candidate.
Friends I am no great fan of Congress party, but thinking that the BJP is very concerned about India or about hindus is absolutely wrong. they are only concerned about getting votes.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:hypocrisy of BJP
by Sabka Baap on Dec 22, 2007 10:34 PM  Permalink
Now bhindranwale will be equaly worshipped like Guru Nanakdevji.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:hypocrisy of BJP
by Vinay Gupta on Dec 22, 2007 10:36 PM  Permalink
talk about what is wrong and what is right. Donot decide on the basis of what BJP does. Donot u have your own mind?

Have u read Jinnah ( keep aside what adani said). Do u know how cong leadership behaved with everyone who had difference of openion be it Shubhash Bose, Azad, Bhagat Singh, Savarker, Tandon, Lohia etc etc. It was Cong who made Jinnah rebel. No doubt about it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:hypocrisy of BJP
by Sabka Baap on Dec 22, 2007 10:41 PM  Permalink
Subhash chandra Bose, Azad, Bhagat Singh , Savarkar , lohia were not responsible for partisan but Jinnah was. If he was secular then why 90% hindus converted to islam. It is true example of secularism.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:hypocrisy of BJP
by Vinay Gupta on Dec 22, 2007 10:47 PM  Permalink
u r wrong. Congressi say that Savarker was responsible for partition. For their failures and misdeed they find some scape goat

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:hypocrisy of BJP
by Sabka Baap on Dec 22, 2007 10:59 PM  Permalink
What is source of your wrong information. Then according to you and congress saverkar should have made Kaide Azam of Pakistan.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:hypocrisy of BJP
by Manik Bharadwaj on Dec 23, 2007 01:10 AM  Permalink
It was Nehure who is responsible for thr parttion. Neheru and Jinha both wanted to be the primeminister at any cose. So they made two countries and achivied it.

One way it's good that Pakistan is separated. Only mistake was not sending all muslim to Pakistan. Hindustan is for hindu and pakistan for Muslim. That's it.

Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Anyone Interested in Islam? Read Below, Important Message.
by Sukhjeet Singh on Dec 22, 2007 10:33 PM  Permalink
Dear On,

U seem to be out of ur mind quoting out of contexts.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Islam for Dummies
by Shabir Ahmed on Dec 22, 2007 10:34 PM  Permalink
Very well said.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Islam for Dummies
by Vinay Gupta on Dec 22, 2007 10:26 PM  Permalink
!00% correct Mr ON. Study of Islam shud be made compulsary so that no body can teach our youngesters that all religion teach love and compasson. It is purely a myth. Islam preaches hate for other religion. Islam does not allow it followers to get converted. Islam doesnot allow minorities to celebrate festivals in open, to repair or construct new place of worship, to ride a horse in Darul e Islam ( land of Islam).


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
Total 771 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Write a message