RE:Sir Syed, Iqbal, Maulana Azad, Jinnah............has any Muslim leader ever used the word ''Secularism''?
by sita on Dec 18, 2007 02:08 AM Permalink
aa gaya dothead apna bajrangi bhashan lekar
RE:Sir Syed, Iqbal, Maulana Azad, Jinnah............has any Muslim leader ever used the word ''Secularism''?
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 18, 2007 02:03 AM Permalink
DEOBAND IS A WAHABI ISLAMIC SCHOOL.
IT WAS CREATED AFTER DEMISE OF ISLAMIC RULE IN INDIA AFTER SEPOY MUTINY.
DEOBAND IS AGAINST SYNCREATIC INDIAN ISLAM. LIKE SUFISM.
RE:RE:Sir Syed, Iqbal, Maulana Azad, Jinnah............has any Muslim leader ever used the word ''Secularism''?
by Fact Speaker on Dec 18, 2007 02:19 AM Permalink
Why Congress has given Bharat Ratna to Abul Kalam azad and that also after 30 years of his death?
RE:The main problem is ISLAM
by on Dec 18, 2007 02:14 AM Permalink
the main problem is rss mentality . which finds mistakes in all good things and call their unholy hooliganc acts as hinduism
Does Raghavan agree that despite problem with us, at least one individual with guts to say that Hindus also also have basic rights gets elected in India?
Call India only for 1.35 cents per min, special offer for Christmas and new year Just Visit . . //:freevcallsDOTblogspotDOTcom/
Please replace DOT by (.) . .
and read the latest blog of cheapest or free call to India. If you are happy with this, please leave a comment and do not forget to forward this link to your family and friends,
She could not find her male partner anurag and is depressed. Now she has become abusive because of that. prakash baboon, don't be depressed yaar. We will take care of you.
I am afraid, the author has only shown a one sided view along with that Ramanujam (who is he?) by glorifying the Western thinking of morality. Of course, I also feel Indian thinking of morality is skewed, but this shows the author has not understood and accepted the nation yet. Can the author show me one country in the whole planet which is as diverse as ours. Most western countries have one major religion and hence their thinking is homogenous. Further, western philosophy too is skewed on morality like abortions, the Iraq war, the salvery in earlier years, nuclear war etc. (there are plenty and plenty of them). Does it mean their morality is absolute? Why doesn't the author question the western morality although it has killed more people in the world than India has ever done in history? Why doesn't he understand the basic plurality of India and accept that we have different kind of people trying to protect their own interests. This kind of thinking is rather got to do with 'anthropology' since this is the way humans are (protectionists for their society), be it anywhere on the planet. I dare the author and that Ramanujam to defend this. Just do not deride one's culture to please the Westerners. Stop that.
