RE:Give a Slaps to Sonia Gandhi, Gopalswamy and Navin Chawla
by Indian on Dec 16, 2007 10:14 AM Permalink
You please correct the way my country is called, it is "INDIA" and not INIDA, --- Lol
RE:Give a Slaps to Sonia Gandhi, Gopalswamy and Navin Chawla
by mahendra nayak on Dec 16, 2007 10:14 AM Permalink
The video has evidence. Just wait for the video to be opened. Then what was happening. Don't get brain washed by Society of Rumor spreaders
RE:RE:Give a Slaps to Sonia Gandhi, Gopalswamy and Navin Chawla
by Indian on Dec 16, 2007 10:15 AM Permalink
Well observed Nayak, we need more and more people like you in our country, Jai Hind
RE:Give one more slap to the EC member
by mahendra nayak on Dec 16, 2007 10:15 AM Permalink
Means all politicians shall be slapping EC officials when they are caught. First let the minister face the bells for this slap then we will think of one more slap.
RE:Vote for Modi Only
by mahendra nayak on Dec 16, 2007 09:42 AM Permalink
If true hindu votes for Modi then people who are not voting for modi are what? Then Hindus are in minority.
RE:RE:RE:Vote for Modi Only
by zafar arif on Dec 16, 2007 09:45 AM Permalink
Dear Kamal Thareja, stop day dreaming, you are still breathing in secular India, and not Hindutva India, even the idea itself goes against the spirit of constitution and unity of our Mother Land-India. Think twice before writing such filths, which could only show the dirty pattern of thinking of few unethicals ...
RE:RE:Vote for Modi Only
by zafar arif on Dec 16, 2007 09:45 AM Permalink
Dear Kamal Thareja, stop day dreaming, you are still breathing in secular India, and not Hindutva India, even the idea itself goes against the spirit of constitution and unity of our Mother Land-India. Think twice before writing such filths, which could only show the dirty pattern of thinking of few unethicals ...
First mistake was doing something unconstitutional then above that slapping a EC official. Since the EC officials represents the whole Inida, she has slapped 100 crore Indians. Let us wait for Modi's government's fall so the new government can open all those cases which were supressed by people in power.
RE:It is not a slap on EC, it is on 100 crores Indians.
by Mihir on Dec 16, 2007 10:03 AM Permalink
If you try to play with 5.5 crore Gujarati, you will get slapped!
RE:It is not a slap on EC, it is on 100 crores Indians.
by Aam Aadmi on Dec 16, 2007 09:40 AM Permalink
the officer was teasing women. he was also video graphing women inappropriately. he deserved more than just a slap. she should also slap on one more face -yours.
RE:It is not a slap on EC, it is on 100 crores Indians.
by mahendra nayak on Dec 16, 2007 09:43 AM Permalink
Another story from Society of Rumor Spreaders. The video contains everything. If you have guts ask the minister to file a FIR against the EC official.
RE:It is not a slap on EC, it is on 100 crores Indians.
by Joseph Fernendes on Dec 16, 2007 09:49 AM Permalink
If such videos are done of congress and communist politicians, you will see much more.
Yesterday all tea garden workers in Assam were given free liquor, money and other narcotics to get a statement of support for the congress in the recent panchayat elections. Where is the stupid EC now ?
RE:It is not a slap on EC, it is on 100 crores Indians.
by Aam Aadmi on Dec 16, 2007 09:47 AM Permalink
let your mother and sisters be filmed that way. You are the rumor spreader..how is a slap on one official, a slap on 100 crore people, hater?
RE:It is not a slap on EC, it is on 100 crores Indians.
by Indian on Dec 16, 2007 10:19 AM Permalink
Dear Aam Aadmi, you are a loser, that is why u are involving someone's mother and sister, If the minister finds something wrong or objectional about the EC representative, she can always complain, who stopped her, You are behaving like your minister only, sick leader and a follower
RE:It is not a slap on EC, it is on 100 crores Indians.
by K Raj on Dec 16, 2007 09:54 AM Permalink
Anandi Bhajpa has missed a golden opportunity. She could easily have videographed the EC videographer violating the social code of conduct with women to discredit him and then gone about merrily doing what she wished. A bit of common sense and she could have improved her chances with her pot of money. Where did she get the pot from?
It is a matter of shame that a minister of Gujarat slpped an official of EC when he tried to video graph the Election compgain event. Legally he was on his duty as per the infomation read.So the politician is at fault. However it is a matter of pity that so called the officials are also many times biased hance the frustation in contestants lead to such matters of shame. EC officials should be totally balanced which many times becomes a point of debate.Our democracy should review and set up a vigilance body which even monitors EC officials functions too so that unbiased Elections are conducted in free and fearless manner then only the franchise can be termed as Popular other wise it could lead to the conclusion of Poll poverty rather than popularity.
RE:Treatment met by EC Officials by politicians
by Joseph Fernendes on Dec 16, 2007 09:51 AM Permalink
If such videos are done of congress and communist politicians, you will see much more.
Yesterday all tea garden workers in Assam were given free liquor, money and other narcotics to get a statement of support for the congress in the recent panchayat elections. Where is the stupid EC now ?
RE:Treatment met by EC Officials by politicians
by Aam Aadmi on Dec 16, 2007 09:40 AM Permalink
the officer was teasing women. he was also video graphing women inappropriately. he deserved more than just a slap.
RE:Treatment met by EC Officials by politicians
by mahendra nayak on Dec 16, 2007 09:44 AM Permalink
If minister has guts ask her to file a FIR against the EC official. The video has the evidence.
RE:Treatment met by EC Officials by politicians
by Aam Aadmi on Dec 16, 2007 09:51 AM Permalink
EC owns the video. EC has been blackmailing all along during this election. It is anti-gujarat commission supported by people like you.
RE:RE:RE:Treatment met by EC Officials by politicians
by Joseph Fernendes on Dec 16, 2007 09:51 AM Permalink
Kutt ko dekh kar hati nahi chillata hai bhai.
Change is symbol of advancement and always take us to the path of progress removing ignorance from our mind.
Why western countries so advance compared to state or countries where there is no change in Govenments? In advance countries they keep replacing government before it could become currupt.It is better way to create competition between the parties and leaders to do their best.
Communalism is a cancer on society which keep destroying a nation. Communal people have no moral feeling or sympathy to anyone.
Imagine a daily wage labour, a rickshaw puller who work very hard whole day then he is able to feed his hungry children. But these communal antisocial, anti human make thier lives more painful with thier violence and they cannot even feed their kids for days knowing that these poor are Hindu, Muslim and could belong to any religion.
Who cares becasue these communal enemies of country and society are paid in millions by foreign countries agents to harm our great country. They are like parasites.
It's time for people of our country to wake up and fight these forces of destruction with unity and determination before they inflict more damage to our country and society as a whole.
The word Hindu is not a religious word. It is secular in origin. It is derived from the word Sindhu, which is the name of a major river that flows in the northwestern region of the Indian subcontinent. The ancient Greeks and Armenians used to refer the people living beyond the river Sindhu as Hindus and gradually the name struck. When the Muslims came to the sub continent they called the people living in the region as Hindustanis to distinguish them from the foreign Muslims. Subsequently when the British established their rule, they started calling the local religions collectively under the name of Hinduism.
It is interesting to note that the word is neither Sanskrit nor Dravidian and did not originate in India. It was not used by Indians in their descriptions or writings till the 17th century. If we go by the original definition of the word Hindu, any one who lives in the subcontinent is a Hindu and whatever religion he or she practices is Hinduism. The word Hindu is a secular word and literally translated it means Indian and the word Hinduism denotes any religion or religions that are practiced by the multitude of people living in the land beyond the river Indus.
RE:What is the Fight For??
by ajith kumar on Dec 16, 2007 09:39 AM Permalink
Dear Contractor, i appreciate your views. People of this country practised secularism, tolerance and coexistence. They even worship trees, animals and birds. The Hindustan was rich in culture and wealth
But this very innocence of Hindus had been exploited by contemporary rulers from Mugal emperors till British. During invasion history, we looted, killed, converted and even they rape and kidnapped our women. They destroyed our cultural centres and temples. Madhura, Ayodhya and Tajmahal are some examples. Indians could not able to resist because they were divided and they only practised secularism.
But the patience has its on limit. How much we were suppressed we have to bounce back. This is the natural law. The time ended which we were only practising secularism and always at received ends.
This is the time for rejuvenation, which is happening now. How much the pseudo secularists cry or make voice against this, the very fact is imminent%u2026.
The time exceeds for hindus to learn from their on mistakes..
If we fail to act at this stage the culture, The heritage everything will vanish from the earth soon..
So my dear Hindu brothers and sisters let us Act%u2026..
RE:What is the Fight For??
by mahendra nayak on Dec 16, 2007 09:48 AM Permalink
Today we are living in modern technology. When authentic evidence is presented before a school going child he accepts it. But evidence provided by rumor spreaders for TajMahal and qutum minaar is funny. The same thing holds good for your whole article. If you want to grow with pro-active mind long term success is sure, but with creating reactive mind short term goals like grabbing power, one may succeed but lies expands the gap between rumor mongers and the people.
RE:What is the Fight For??
by mahendra nayak on Dec 16, 2007 09:16 AM Permalink
Be writing Mr Contractor. This forum was boring with. It was full of articles written by people brain washed by Society of Rumor spreaders. You are writing articles with a person unbiased person with common sense will surely understand.
