Paradox is his trademark. He is a collage of multiple images -- inept pragmatist, Hindu fanatic, chief monster, can-do leader, dictator, development man, prime minister material, a menace to democracy, polarising and communal, CEO of Gujarat Inc Exactly right this what hitler shown
RE:why Modi comparable to hitler
by sanjay choudhry on Dec 13, 2007 09:16 PM Permalink
Do Muslims love democracy? If so, then how many Islamic countries are democracies?
RE:why Modi comparable to hitler
by siv on Dec 13, 2007 09:19 PM Permalink
I dont care about Musslim counteies I Care my proud Secular India. so that there is no place for Merchants of haredness, communalism eventually to death
RE:RE:why Modi comparable to hitler
by siv on Dec 13, 2007 09:20 PM Permalink
I dont care about Musslim countries I Care my proud Secular India. so that there is no place for Merchants of hatredness, communalism eventually to death
RE:why Modi comparable to hitler
by sanjay choudhry on Dec 13, 2007 09:44 PM Permalink
In another words, Muslims only love secularism when they are in a minority. That is very conenient. Is that a survival strategy?
Also, do Muslims believe in national boundaries, or all the Muslims of the world are a single nation? If not, then why do Muslims riot in India when Saddam Hussain is hanged?
Surprisingly author of this Article wants to dismiss Modi, but just by his own standard like "he is wrong because I say so" no rational, no proof, nothing.
Mr. Parvin Sheth doesn't take any of the claims Modi and his administrations has made and is making in their campaign, and then make argument against it, rather just keep ranting on things which are mostly speculative, personal feelings and cannot be proven.
For ex. He goes "His imaginative adoption of the 'yellow' model of economic growth (taken from Eastern Tiger countries%u2026." and "imaginative introduction of SEZs and port-based development%u2026"
So, if some try to do something which you disagree with, that becomes "Imaginative" ?
Also, he seems to be quite knowledgably about castes in Gujarat, but also seems to forget many other castes like Baniyas, Bhramins and so on%u2026
If you read entire article author seems to dripping with feeling of anti-Modiesm rather than writing based on facts, which what a "Journalist" is supposed to do.
RE:Personal feelings or Journalism....
by Satya a on Dec 13, 2007 09:00 PM Permalink
I wonder why the intelligentsia all over the planet are anti-Modi, while the rest seem to drool over Modi. I really wonder why! Contrast the Tarun Tejpals with the Babu Bajrangis.
RE:Personal feelings or Journalism....
by sanjay choudhry on Dec 13, 2007 09:12 PM Permalink
India's intellegent is leftist / commie and anti-national to the core. For years they took bribes from the USSR. Read Mitrokin archives. What do you expect?
RE:Personal feelings or Journalism....
by Sherry Thomas on Dec 13, 2007 09:17 PM Permalink
dude..take a break...what do u mean to say wen indias intelligentsia is leftist...ur comment obviosly shows u as ignorant
RE:Personal feelings or Journalism....
by sanjay choudhry on Dec 13, 2007 09:23 PM Permalink
One-liners don't prove anything. What makes you think India's intelligentsia is not leftist?
And when are you allowing pagans entry into your heaven?
RE:Personal feelings or Journalism....
by Stee on Dec 13, 2007 09:38 PM Permalink
Satya goes "I wonder why the intelligentsia all over the planet are anti-Modi" well, it depends how you define "intelligentsia" , if having some linguistic skills - especially in English - is your definition for so called "intelligentsia" then good luck.
In Europe there is only one country which predominantly speaks English - that is Great Britain
As far, Tarun Tejpal and Babu Bajranji goes, I haven't seen/read report, only thing I know is meaning of "Bajrangi" it relates to more Shiv Sena...
His days are over and I am wondering what is the author of this article trying to potray. His mother wearing Rs.5 Chappal. I wish she has used that 'chappal' for what Modi did during the riot and he would not have been what he is now. he deserve to answer million of questions before he exits. He should be legally tried directly by Supreme Court who has shown tremendous interest to save the plural & secular image of India. All these modis fans are found only on this rediff news papers. No other papers have these fans out there. No one care for him and that is a good sign for India. I am proud Indian and would love to see India a soverign and secular state.
RE:Modi is going 'down-slope' of the Hill now...Good for India
by Stee on Dec 13, 2007 09:18 PM Permalink
@Raj sez "He should be legally tried directly by Supreme Court "
I agree with you, but I also believe that we should be even, i.e. "Crime is Crime, and every one involved in it should be tried and punished"
I was wondering what are your thoughts on 84 Anti-sikh riots, has any one een tried so far or should be tried ? Also what are thoughts on...
What should happed to Afzal Guru, person who is one of who attachked on Indian Parliament
"I am proud Indian and would love to see India a soverign and secular state."
So am I, but unfornutly we are slowly losing our Soverignity to so called "Western States", for ex. "Nuclear Deal" with US.
by the way, I'm not fan of Modi or BJP, but would support who ever want's bring properity to India and Gujarat be it Modi or Manmohan Singh , from BJP or Congress or any other party.
India has severe shortage of "non corrupt" and politician who works in favor masses
RE:Modi is going 'down-slope' of the Hill now...Good for India
by Satya a on Dec 13, 2007 08:58 PM Permalink
Very well said my friend. I have spoken to lots of people in Gujarat. The mood is not like what you see in Rediff by these apparently literate people. It is different in Gujarat where rozi roti, and good governance are just lies being spread. I interact with a lot of people from the economically backward strata of society as part of my job, and they just HATE Modi. Hindutva is passe. People are not bothered about Hindutva, they just want to live happily with roti, kapda aur makaaan. The farmers have so many stories to tell that Modi would feel ashamed if he were a human being. SO MANY lies about development. Ahmedabad and Baroda are NOT gujarat. There are lots of other cities and villages which are like graveyards. All LIES by the saffron mafia.
RE:Tell me please!
by sanjay choudhry on Dec 13, 2007 09:05 PM Permalink
If no party gets a clear majority, the governor has to invite the leader of a political party who is most iikely to form the govt. Once the leader is sworn in, he has to prove his majority wihtin 15 days or so. This is when horse trading starts and MLAs are bribed to support the govt. Presidential system is much better.
RE:Tell me please!
by Satya a on Dec 13, 2007 09:09 PM Permalink
Thanks Sanjay.....So, in all probability, Modi will be sworn in, and asked to prove his majority if there's a deadlock.
No one in India can give a satisfactory answer to the demolition of Babari Masjid nor could a judgment came out.Tresspassing may be allowed in their views whoever present at the time of demolition of the so publicised Babri Masjid demolision case.Our Judicials are just skin savers of the post they want to keep intact. Whom did u ask to take a chair where 100 Crores of Indians look on your impartial decicision. Every1 has that ability to keep matters pending , even a trainee advocate could get sensitive case postponed for a desired date where a learned & decisive Judge is present.Jessica Lal murdeer case,Nitish Kataria murder case,Shivani Bhatnagr murder case,CBI raids & their silence afterwards all indicates the manipulations of someone's desires. JUST GATHER A 22% vote and rule the world. Is it not so ?
Surprisingly author of this Article wants to dismiss Modi, but just by his own standard like %u201Che is wrong because, I said so%u201D no rational, no proof, nothing.
Mr. Parvin Sheth doesn%u2019t take any of the claim Modi and his administration has made and is making in their campaign and make argument against it, rather just keep ranting on things which are mostly speculative, personal feelings and cannot be proven.
For ex. He goes %u201CHis imaginative adoption of the 'yellow' model of economic growth (taken from Eastern Tiger countries%u2026.%u201D and %u201Cimaginative introduction of SEZs and port-based development%u2026%u201C
So, if some try to do something which you disagree with, that becomes %u201CImaginative%u201D ?
Also, he seems to be quite knowledgably about castes in Gujarat, but also seems to forget many other castes like Baniyas, Bhramins and so on%u2026
If you read entire article author seems to dripping with feeling of anti-Modiesm rather than writing based on facts, which what a %u201CJournalist%u201D is supposed to do.
RE:Personal feelings or Journalism
by kamesh on Dec 13, 2007 08:51 PM Permalink
SEE NDTV TOI HT,ALL ENGLISH PAPERS ARE IN CLUB OF CONGRESS , THEY ARE NOT REPORTING MODI`S SPEECH , ALL JOURNALIST FROM KARAN THAPAR , RAJDEEP, TEJPALS , TO SHEELA BHATT HAVE BEEN HIRED , THEY ARE THINKING THEY CAN MAKE OR BREWAK A GOVERNMENT, GUJRAT HAS TO TEACH WHO SELECT THE GOVERNMENT
Women in Gujarat decisively voted against Sonia Gandhi%u2019s propaganda %u2013 Bjp to register a landslide victory Parth Sharma Dec. 13, 2007
The negative propaganda of Sonia Gandhi and the Congress party backfired. The women of Gujarat voted decisively for Narendra Modi and his party BJP in the election.
The flamboyant Chief Minister portrayed an image of political purifier added to the charismatic character. It is not just the urban women from the cities that made the difference but also the women form the villages and the countryside that lined up to vote for BJP.
The male voters has fallen by nearly 3 percentage points to 62%, and at the same time the percentage of women has gone down marginally to 57%. The gap between male and female voters, which was 7% in 2002, has shrunk to 4% in 2007. That 3% gap reduction has provided the massive boost to the BJP candidates.
2) Why do we celebrate Gandhi Jayanti every year instead of Godse Jayanti?
3) why reservation given to sc, st, dalit and why brahmins are neglected in govt. job?
4) why they didnt take action against WB govt for Nandi killings?
5) why they acceded land to china in indo china war?
6) why they acceded parts of kashmiriland to Pak in indo -pak war?
7) Why they critise Ram but not allah or jesus?
8) why they did not give subsidy to hindu pilgrimage?
9) why keeping mum on malysian indians issue?
10) why keeping mum on afzal hanging?
11) why lenient to Sanjay dutt?
12) why having alliance with DMK who r believed to be partners with LTTE in Rajiv killings?
13) why no congress leader than Rajiv got killed in his assasination?
14) why giving only Rs.166 for war hero but giving Rs.2000 for militants who r willing to surrender?
15) why keeping mum on nepal convict who is a congress MP.
16) why keeping mum on militants who r arrested from congress MLA home in manipur?
17) why Keeping mum on assam adivasi atrocities?
18) why going back to karunakaran who has stripped u lots of time? pls answer i agree congress is less evil as it killed 5000 sikhs in a day.. it did not kill 5000 muslims
Congress is less evil.. as it gave birth to minority apeasement --shah bano?
Narendra modi is a terroist? USA denies him Visa then what is GW Bush? human rights activist? 1) Indians should not be bothe
RE:MEDIA pls answer
by . on Dec 13, 2007 09:59 PM Permalink
bush the mass murderer of innocent iraqis denies visa to modi. what a shameless bush n his ind supporters.
RE:RE:Voted for Modi
by will on Dec 13, 2007 09:02 PM Permalink
ok.. sumantha. tumhari khwahish jaldi hi puri hogi... jab tub loksabha chunav ke liye - Modi ko vote doge... those days are not far now..
RE:what a shamelessley anti-modi article
by Joseph Fernendes on Dec 13, 2007 08:25 PM Permalink
Dear Idiot, you have posted this in a different name sometime back. 1) Why they are keeping mum on Sikh killings?
2) Why do we celebrate Gandhi Jayanti every year instead of Godse Jayanti?
3) why reservation given to sc, st, dalit and why brahmins are neglected in govt. job?
4) why they didnt take action against WB govt for Nandi killings?
5) why they acceded land to china in indo china war?
6) why they acceded parts of kashmiriland to Pak in indo -pak war?
7) Why they critise Ram but not allah or jesus?
8) why they did not give subsidy to hindu pilgrimage?
9) why keeping mum on malysian indians issue?
10) why keeping mum on afzal hanging?
11) why lenient to Sanjay dutt?
12) why having alliance with DMK who r believed to be partners with LTTE in Rajiv killings?
13) why no congress leader than Rajiv got killed in his assasination?
14) why giving only Rs.166 for war hero but giving Rs.2000 for militants who r willing to surrender?
15) why keeping mum on nepal convict who is a congress MP.
16) why keeping mum on militants who r arrested from congress MLA home in manipur?
17) why Keeping mum on assam adivasi atrocities?
18) why going back to karunakaran who has stripped u lots of time? pls answer i agree congress is less evil as it killed 5000 sikhs in a day.. it did not kill 5000 muslims
Congress is less evil.. as it gave birth to minority apeasement --shah bano?
Narendra modi is a terroist? USA denies him Visa then w
RE:what a shamelessley anti-modi article
by sanjay choudhry on Dec 13, 2007 08:39 PM Permalink
Satya jee:
Better teach your spin to Congress because the Rajiv Gandhi Foundation officially declared Gujarat under Modi as the best administered state in India. India Today has called him the best chief minister of India.
It is you who is brainwashed. You are a convert, aren't you? Your pagan hatred won't go far in this country.
RE:what a shamelessley anti-modi article
by siv on Dec 13, 2007 09:14 PM Permalink
Mr joseph Fernadas or sanjay chowdary or madhav mysoor we can understand and recognise you vhp activist even you branded in diffrent names. Well.. modi will be a missiha for facist minded people
