alas prakash had to take the inevitable, as he had no other option afetr devegowda made him look like a joker, wonder what political insights this man might have when even the dogs in the streets weren't/are beleieving devegowda and his sons how could a sensible man like prakash with so much of political experience could trust him, in any case prakash doesn't seem to have any future leftover in the active politics as already sensed by him, goodluck to him
RE:lomg awaited
by dilawar on Dec 12, 2007 10:22 PM Permalink
Agreed, Devvara Gowda he is a black mark on gowda caste. People of karnataka will throw him in dust bin in next elections thats for sure.
Deve Gowda is the only one whom we Indians are ashamed to call even a former prime minister. He served ten months as a Central Government employee in Delhi, mostly touring round the world with the family, doing duty free shopping, visiting Bangalore, all at Government cost and living at the cost of the people of Indian Republic. Was also a State Government employee for over two decades, drawing no salary, but only the blood, sweat and pockets of people.
RE:Deve Gowda
by drdinesh sharma on Dec 12, 2007 10:15 PM Permalink
Every word of your text about Mr.DEV GOWADA is the best of truth and all the people of Karnataka should know his true identity, and the worst example in power politics of deceiving and reverting from commitments..
RE:Deve Gowda
by dilawar on Dec 12, 2007 10:20 PM Permalink
He is DEVVARA (bhoot,satan,Ghost) GOWDA. He has insatiable lust for power. His sons are bunch of jokers like his DAD.
While in power, Mr Prakash had no problems aligning with both Congress and BJP but now that he finds that Mr Deve Gowda is out of power, he talks about 'principled politics'. What double standards?
RE:M P Prakash
by anil b on Dec 12, 2007 10:28 PM Permalink
symapthise with him buddy , he was made a sucker by devegowda so many time just like our yeddi . maybe he stills wants to retain his clout among veerashaivas . too bad they feel he is wimpish and was too subservant to DG and company.
RE:M P Prakash
by Murali Krishna on Dec 12, 2007 09:46 PM Permalink
He stayed in Party hoping against that Deva Gowda and his clan will change. But they have become like hardend criminals / rogues. They will not change in their life time. Hence, he quit!!
RE:Devegowda reigns...
by Sathish N on Dec 12, 2007 08:29 PM Permalink
Why should he quit. Just float another party and come to power. JD(S) will have a natural death quickly.
RE:Devegowda reigns...
by bhaskar on Dec 12, 2007 08:25 PM Permalink
IMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMPOSSSIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIBLEEEEEEEEEEEEEE SIR, HE IS SUCH A MAN HE WILLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL HOLLLLLLLLLLLLLLD ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN & ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN & ONNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN. THERE IS NO RESPECT LEFT IN THEM EVEN THOUGH THE WHOLE COUNTRY WAS LAUGHING AT KARNATAKA'S POLITICAL TAMASHA
Which ever party he joins,he will back stab at the eleventh hour just for the sake and power and pelf at the backdrop of coalition politics in india.It is better no to touch him a make him another "power center"in the party.People like him are spineless.He will be aliability than an asset.
RE:JD-S leader M P Prakash quits party
by anil b on Dec 12, 2007 10:31 PM Permalink
i agree he was spineless but he was hoping like yeddi that DG and co will make them kings unless they realised they are suckers (ass !!!!!) hehehhehehehhh
RE:JD-S leader M P Prakash quits party
by Sathish N on Dec 12, 2007 08:28 PM Permalink
Do not know much about prakash, but coming out of JD(S) or not supporting the selfish policies of Kumarasamy-gowda duo is definitely not back stabbing.
RE:JD-S leader M P Prakash quits party
by Vijay on Dec 12, 2007 09:04 PM Permalink
It seems u donot have the deep knowledge of Karnataka Politics. If U think Mr. MP Prakash is a Backstabber, either u donot have deep knowledge of Karnataka Politics or u lack ability to analyse the People correctly or possibly u have pre-juduced mindset. Mr. Praksah might have acted many a times the way he would not have, mainly because of the compulsions created by the Party he was in.
By far, compared to current breed of politicians, he is definitely good. Offcourse, nobody is or can be absolutely good. If so, nobody can servive in politics.
RE:RE:good
by balbhim patil on Dec 12, 2007 11:02 PM Permalink
DER AYE DURUST AYE,,,,,,,,,VERY RIGHT DECISION, HAD HE TAKEN THIS DECISION BEFORE ASSEMBLY DISSOLUTION IT WOULD HAVE BENEFITED STATE AND ELECTION COULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED, NOW HE SHALL NOT RE JOIN DEVEGOUDA OR K, SWAMI GROUP. NORMALLY THIS HAPPENS TO LEADERS LIKE PRAKSH TO GO BACK TO THEM AND LEAVE FOLLOWERS IN DIFFICULTY, BETTER HE JOINS BJP . FORMING OWN PARTY OR JOINING CONGRES WIL BE SUCIDAL.
They hop around all parties in the name of ideology. And the only ideology that matters is Power and personal ambition. Yesterdays communal element will be todays secular leader if he or she leaves BJP. And yesterdays secular will overnight become communal if he joins BJP.
So the X factor in Indian politics today is B J P. If you are with it you are branded communal. And if you are out of it you are Secular. Weird isnt it?
