in 1980s and 1990s he tried to project himself as the alternative to American supremacy.
He even tried to create a super Arab state merging Libya, Sudan etc. He failed to make any difference or impact. Finally he made peace with USA and now is content being yet another ordinary dictator.
He calls Libya a republic, but he is preparing his son for becoming the next ruler.
Gadaffi is yet another joker like Musharaf, who refuses to bring democracy and freedom to his nation .
I do not know much about whether Gaddafi is friendly to India or not at present. But I have read that during the 1971 war he supported and extended help to Pakistan, purely on religious grounds. The Pakistani leaders were so grateful they named a stadium after him in Lahore, Gaddafi stadium. Is it true?
RE:Gaddafi
by Akram on Dec 11, 2007 04:08 PM Permalink
IRAN always supported india in Kashmir issue, but on US pressure we acted against them. so there are no permanent foes or friends in life only permanent intrests
It should be shame for everybody whatever will be the topic but they bring religion to discuss here and pinpointing on each other if we see 1 thing nobody has proper knowledge about there religion and as well about others please always take care whenever you speak coz half knowledge is injurious to the society, please try to speak about peace and unity if you cant then atleast dont spread nuisance, hatred remember 1 more thing when a person speaks it shows his character and manners.
As age dawnsupon all the dictators become clowns.Take the example of Idi Amin and many others irrespective of religion.Gaddafi is no exception.the only tragedy is that the dignified politicians like Sarkozy are sitting with such clowns
RE:Maveric Gaddafi
by neil roy on Dec 11, 2007 02:41 PM Permalink
there shudnt be any hue and cry about it..he is a leader and free to choose his bodyguards..what he does behind the glare of media or his people is a separate matter..for that matter we all know what the politicians discreetly...as long as he behaves in a civilised manner we cant say anything bout him...besides he is a reformer in the making..and can libya to new heights..
RE:RE:gaddafi
by shaji tabor on Dec 11, 2007 02:21 PM Permalink
I am not communist,but iwant to know why You are supporting America,America is crumbling nation,christanity will be wiped out from america by muslims and hindus,
RE:RE:RE:RE:gaddafi
by shaji tabor on Dec 11, 2007 02:42 PM Permalink
Why r u using abusive language.I myself a christian,so i am very much of aware that what is going on inside church and its politics.British had came to india not educate people,but to loot india.If they have brought some reforms it was for their covenience.
RE:gaddafi
by Bipin Musale on Dec 11, 2007 03:51 PM Permalink
Civilisation had dawned on the Indian subcontinent long before even the birth of christainity. Jejus christ had come to India and learned a lot from Buddhism and his preachings were also influenced by Buddhism. These Indian christains identify themselves with britishers but the latter care two hoot for them. The ancestors of the Indian christains embrassed christainty thinking that the western world will embrace them and treat them with equality. On the contrary they landed themselves in another discrimination against them by the white westerners. So also the muslim converts here are looked down upon by the ashrafs. God knows what they gained by converting to an alien faith. Both of them now should do well to shed their alien colors and embrace Buddism(or Jainism or any other "ism" originated on this soil) and join the mainstream.
RE:gaddafi
by prem anand on Dec 11, 2007 04:00 PM Permalink
my friend being a christian dont consider me as a supporter of british,i'm a hard core fantic nationalist i'm more nationalist than the rss,bajrang dal or vhp,the indian blood runs in my body,i've have had sveral fights with my neighbours during cricket matches and usually it was physical,but unfortunately the police is always supports them,this is the tragedy of our country
