congressi sonia acted like duryodhan, and now congressi singhvi is acting like dushashan. the only difference is sonia thankfully belongs to tactless non-hindu mafia street culture of italy, and not related to any of bjp guys, unlike in mahabharat.
RE:congressi dushashan
by Pradip Parekh on Dec 09, 2007 05:31 AM Permalink
another example of sonia's italian street culture: for her everybody opposed to the nuke deal was enemy of india.
1984 Massaacar, Lady Sonia's Husband Killed,today She welcomes the said party & with there support enjoys her image!! Cant give justice to any Terrorist, who has been sentanceed to Death! One can decide who are MAUT KE SAUDAGAR, She should Know what she talks.Mr Manmohan Singh should atleast train her on Hindi,A TERRORIST IS A TERRORIST irrespect of Cast/Religion.She can shake hands with her Hasband's killer party. Not Modi
The rioters of the 1984 Sikh carnage, in which over 3000 people were killed in Delhi, were apparently paid Rs 500 for each person they killed, a new book on the riots reveals, reinforcing the allegation that the violence far from being spontaneous was the outcome of a conspiracy.
The book, titled When A Tree Shook Delhi, written by journalist Manoj Mitta and advocate for many of the riot victims' families, H S Phoolka, claims to give an "uncensored" insight into the events. The book traces the genesis of the violence through eyewitness accounts and the investigations by Phoolka as counsel for victims.
Quoting from the affidavit of war widow Joginder Kaur, the book says when the police was taking her, along with her two sons, to a safe place to protect them from the rage of the rioters, she saw members of a mob remonstrating with the police inspector that, by shielding her two sons he was ''putting them at a loss of Rs 500 each''. The members were so upset about their monetary loss that, at that point, the policemen had to draw out their revolvers and threaten to fire at the mob.
It was a tell-tale evidence, preciously scarce, of the manner in which the violence had been organised. Rioters were paid and they were paid in proportion to the number of Sikhs killed by them, the author says.
The pay-offs issue reinforces the allegation that the violence, far from being spontaneous, was the outcome of a high-level conspiracy. However, Justice Ranganath Misra Commission,
RE:Merchants of death paid Rs. 500 for each death of 1984 Sikh carnage
by Sahadevan KK on Dec 10, 2007 09:28 AM Permalink
Both culprit and witness get same punishment in Democracy. An innocent human being very easily being arrested, but a ruling culprit can roam here and there in our system.
What name for 1984 killers who paid 500 rupees for every killing of the most patriotic section of the society? ---- They (Singvi's congress) are the ruthless killeer-terrorists. They are not even ashamed of trying to fool the nation every now and then.they do not even hesitate in blowing falsely things out of proportion. Amount released by the National Democratic Alliance government during 2002-04 for tribal development was Rs 4,530 lakh, while the UPA released Rs 9,625.34 lakh during 2005-07---Mr. Singvi is not aware of the market--probably, they do not manage their expenditures of their own as is common with every parasite, otherwise he would have known that the rates have gone up manifold since 2002.--Congress people are masters of illogical comparison.
what about 1984 case? the difference was: the media was not this popular then. There was only state controlled (thus congress controlled) Doordarshan. Manmohan singh is a sikh, does not he have any self respect? Doesnt he have balls?
There is no unity in Congress itself. Sonia - by saying that she referred to Modi has shown her true self. She is just a burden on her party and on this nation. Congress guys - first decide who is your actual spokesperson and then play to the media gallery.
If congress does win - i am sure it will be by having the EVM's rigged by a pliant EC. That EC is also pandering to her is proved beyond doubt.
