NOW JAGDISH TAITLER HAVE DONE NOTHING IN 1984 SIKH RIOTS. DO YOU BELIEVE IT. THE PRESENT CONGRESS GOVT IS JUST FOR THAT. ALL THEIR SINS WILL BE WIPED OFF BY THIS GOVT.
MODI VERY RIGHT IN SAYING IT IS BETTER TOBE IN THE MERCY OF ESHWAR THAN SONA TO MANMOHAN SINGH. WHAT FREEDOM HE HAS IN GOVT. FOR EVERY APPROVAL PM NO CONSULTED.OH FUNNY. CONGESS PEOPLE WERE REMINDING ME OF SLAVERY OF BRITISH RULE WHERE BEHAVED LIKE SLAVES OF BRITISHERS. NOW CONGRESS PARTY IS LIKE SONIA'S SLAVES AND AT HER MERCY, HOW SHAME TO A NATIONAL MOMENT CALLED "INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS".
RE:CONGRESS IS PROTECTORS OF SINNERS
by Roopsingh on Dec 09, 2007 03:13 PM Permalink
If Mr. Modi is so strong, then he should accept what he has said. In the meeting he says something and then to the Election Commission he says 'this is not correct'. BJP has no issues other than Hinduism and they talk about these only during elections. They proposed the RAM-SETU project when they are in power but when congress follows it up, they talk about religion. When they were in power, they forgot about the RAM connection to the project. Still we are supporting the BJP.
In his speech about the UP bombings, he told the Parliament that its a total failure of Intelligence Failure. He has forgotten one thing. During his tenure as Home Minister, the Very Parliment was attacked. So as per his speech, that too would be called as Intelligence Failure. If not, we should assume He knew it earlier.
What about Kargil? If thats not an Intelligence Failure, He must have known it already and He allowed it to come back again to power. I am not saying Cogress is good. If you list the worst parties of India, it will be very difficult to judge between these two.
RE:CONGRESS IS PROTECTORS OF SINNERS
by Indumati Sharma on Dec 09, 2007 03:46 PM Permalink
To all right thinking persons:
Pls ignore what Roopsingh has said here because it seems he has very little inteligence and says only out of prejudice. Rebutting such people's remark is like stomping on the mud which also splashes on you.
IF ANY POLITICAL PARTY COMES TO MUSLIM BROTHERS AND SISTERS AND ASKS THEM TO VOTE TO THEM AS BJP IS COMMUNAL, MUSLIM BROTHERS AND SISTERS SHOULD SLAP THEM FIRST. WHY YOU CALL LIKE THAT. THEN THE PROBLEMS WERE SOLVED. ONLY PARTY THAT IS THINKING ABOUT INDIA'S GROWTH SINCERELY IS BJP. AS FAR AS GUJARATH AND MODI IS CONCERNED IT IS OPEN FACT THAT HE WILL WIN, WE HAVE TO SEE HOW MUCH MARGIN HE WINS. YESTERDAY CONGRESS OFFERED RAMSOM MONEY TO SURESH MEHTA OF BJP JUST TO ANNOUCE HIS ANTI MODI STANCE. SO BJP DISSIDANTS SIMPLY USING CONGRESS WEAKNESS AND MAKING MONEY. THEY TOO KNOW THE FACTS. THEY WERE AGAINST MODI JUST BECAUSE HE DIDNT ALLOW THEM TO MAKE MONEY AS MODI IS AGAINST CORRUPTION.
Modi is correct in his reply. Ms Soniaji started campaign with reviving issue of Godhra happened before 5 yrs. otherwise campaign was on development issues. She started saying Maut ke Saudagar. She has forgotten that in Godhra Ramsevaks were killed brutally in Railway. It is completely ignored.
Then who was sohrabuddin? Why Sonia Gandhi should take his side? Was he deshbhakt or gunda? We are paying Rs. 75 to Banasingh who is paramveer and allowing terrorists with Biryani and money.
News papers now a days play politics and dont send news. create hallabol on certain people. especially against hindus. It is required to searched by lifting their veil whether they are funded by govt., muslim countries, chinese govt, christians. because news papers are holy cows they are taking misadvantage out of it.
If modi is maut ke saudagar then what Buddhdeb is who is allowing partyworkers to do halla in nandigram.
Who is Karunanidhi who dare to doubt Lord Rama? Who is MF Husain, Who paints hindu goddesses in nude? If they are correct in their views then Modi is correct.
Otherwise they should also get punished? What kuldip nayyar and Mr Khushwantsingh writes only to appease muslims and creating havoc about hindu terrorism which is not there in the first place.
Actually hindus are g**dus hence they allow these people to reign. Hindus should behave like muslims !
RE:Modi's speech
by joginder on Dec 09, 2007 01:59 PM Permalink
Actually................hence, Mr Gokhale No body asking here you family history be prompt on issue, so that ppls understand your view not faimly history, Shiv Sena chief is socalled Hindu he might be same, Manohar joshi, Advani , Atal , Modi they are all hindu mind it, If you are talking about Mahashtrain we are very much agree, as they cannot survive out side maharashtra
RE:Modi's speech
by Tushar Sakhalkar on Dec 09, 2007 02:47 PM Permalink
Maharashtra i scapable of feeding ALL its own people. We do not neeed to EXPORT people to other states.
TOI is an insult to journalism. They are just surviving by writing endlessly abt film actors, cricketers, models , and so called Page 3 faltus. I have been a regular reader of TOI till date, and forgot whats the real journalism is.In between they write about secularism or some gender biased issues to just show that they are also there for some good cause. And they think its fashionable to write abt tht. Where as u look at Hindustan Times, Indian express, The Hindu ..they always write abt public issues . They take a stand in everything where as TOI is just makes sensation out of nothing. I appreciate if TOI is converted into full time taboid and focus on writing what rakhi sawant wears, sharukh eats or sachin drinks.It suits them and i assure theres a good market for this in india.There are 1000s celebrities just created by TOI and they have exclusive tie with them and share revenues also.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mr.Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee, while addressing a gathering of Muslims to mark the Babri demolition anniversary, had said, "Rama is a figment of a poet's imagination and Rama Sethu is a natural formation under the sea". He had also said, "The Sethusamudram project was being opposed by the Sangh Parivar on religious grounds, but it was vital for the economic development of the region". When SSCP is connected with Tamil Nadu, why should he talk about it at a gathering of Kolkata Muslims, who are in no way concerned about it ? He went on to question the existence of Lord Rama! How can Buddha ridicule a Hindu God in a Muslim gathering? Is it right on his part to make such a malicious statement in a meeting of minorities? Is it not an ugly & stinking 'secular' exercise of vote begging? Those who are crowing & harping on Mr.Modi's general talk on terrorism are keeping quiet now. Why? Does not Buddha deserve prosecution? Nobody will bother, because, he is a "secular leftist"!
RE:Mr.Buddhadeb Battacharjee - Pls Reply
by joginder on Dec 09, 2007 02:02 PM Permalink
Before Asking from anybody, ask to Modi Advani atal or other BJP leader what happened to RAM Mandir / SomNath Mandir,
RE:Mr.Buddhadeb Battacharjee - Pls Reply
by karthikeyen dayanand on Dec 09, 2007 12:43 PM Permalink
i am glad that atleast few are against the idiotic commies
RE:Mr.Buddhadeb Battacharjee - Pls Reply
by DS on Dec 09, 2007 11:29 AM Permalink
very good points... i am done with minority appeasement. everybody better start to care of Hindu majority in India else fear defeat and a boot in the face.
People, who are surprised at the war of words between Congress & BJP, must come to "Dravida Nadu" (Tamil Nadu) and see the ugly level of mud slinging done by the Dravidian Leaders. The Congress, BJP and other state leaders cannot match even 10% of the Dravidian leaders' vocabulary & word power. Let us look at some of the (un)quotable quotes.
First and foremost is our Chief Minister Mr.M.Karunanidhi who said, "Who is Rama? Does he exist? Was he an engineer to build this bridge? If so, in which engineering college he studied? Ramayana is a myth and Rama is an imaginative character". He said these words in massively organized public meetings in Salem & Erode. He did not stop with that. When the entire nation erupted like a volcano the next day over his anti-Ram remarks, he reiterated his statements again in Chennai with arrogance. Later on, he went on to deliberate on Valmiki Ramayana and said "Rama was a drunkard. Valmiki had written about Rama's drinking habits". This incited violence and two persons were burnt to death inside a bus by anti-social elements in the outskirts of Bangalore and his daughter's house in Bangalore was also attacked. Then, His party cadres led by a State Cabinet Minister, Chennai City Mayor and a few MLAs, attacked the BJP / VHP / Hindu Munnani offices and residential buildings through out the state in many places and ransacked them. Then they announced, "The cadres belonging to Sangh organization
RE:Mr.M.Karunanidhi - Pls Reply
by hari pk on Dec 16, 2007 04:43 PM Permalink
Senile MKK has lost it. He is just a pandering scum of TN. Lets see if he has the balls(doubt it) to say the same about Allah/Christ.
"Go ahead, Hang him! Face the consequences. The country will go up in flames. The harmony between Hindus & Muslims would be destroyed. The Judges, who ordered the hanging, would be murdered"! These were the statements of National Conference leader Mr.Farook Abdullah, while advocating clemency for dreaded terrorist Mohammad Afzal Guru, in the parliament attack case. This statement even amounts to blackmailing & threatening the establishment & the judiciary and it also invites contempt of Court! He was also supported by Chief Minister Azad and PDP leader Mehabooba Mufti . These leaders have supported a terrorist, who had masterminded the attack on our Parliament, which is the heart of our democracy and got away with it! Why & How? Because they are "secular" politicians belonging to the minority community! If the statement of Dr.Abdullah doesn't deserve legal actions, then what can we say about it?
Very recently, Dr.Farook Abdullah dropped another bomb shell in his characteristic style. That is, he said, "I regret Kashmir's accession to India. I cannot stand by the Army". Can such words come out of a truly nationalist leader? Is it enough to have the word 'national' only in the name of the party? Nationalism & Patriotism must be in one's blood and only then the heart would feel & mind would think on those lines, and such feeling & thinking only would come out in the form of words. Jammu & Kashmir are an integral part of our country and who is
RE:Dr Farook Abdullah - Pls Reply
by karthikeyen dayanand on Dec 09, 2007 12:47 PM Permalink
only solution. india should take POK by force and create an environment in kashmir for free and fair election. Then Mr. Abdullah will contest and become the CM and will talk about the various brutalities of Indian forces against the Pakistanis during the war and will pledge support for the Pakis.
Congress President Mrs.Sonia, every time when she addresses election rallies, always talks about Hindu majority with contempt, and names the Hindu leaders as "Communalists" & "fundamentalists". Even during the recent UP Assembly elections, she had written a personal letter to thousands of Muslim clerics and leaders saying, "help me generously to fight against communalism (read majority Hindus), so that, I can build a society of your dreams". In the same way, on 2nd of December at an election rally in Gujarat, she had said, "The Gujarat government is being run by leaders who are liars, dishonest and merchants of religion & death". It is an arrogant and uncivilized statement meant to whip up communal passion. She had also made disparaging remarks about RSS & VHP many times in the past, with an aim of capturing Muslim votes. When the MP government issued an order allowing the state government staff to participate in RSS meetings, she immediately shot off a letter to the then President Dr.Kalam, making damaging remarks about the grand old organization, which strives hard to uphold the culture & heritage of our nation. Throughout her political life and particularly in the last three years, she had utilized every opportunity to ridicule Hindu community and its leaders, sometimes even at the rallies of other communities.
If these kinds of speeches and writings do not deserve legal actions, then what kind of a speech deserve?
