RE:bloggers -check this out
by Sampat Kumar on Dec 08, 2007 11:52 PM Permalink
Karunanidhi is Tamil God who does not recognise the real God "Shree Ram"
RE:bloggers -check this out
by desi on Dec 08, 2007 11:25 PM Permalink
I also read it . I think there a lot of people who want to leave islam but fear punishment as apostacy is punishable by death under islamic law.
Like India was the last bastion to conquer for Australian cricket, Gujarat has become last bastion for Sonia to conquer. Alas, like Steve Waugh, Sonia is also destined to fail. And Rahul is not Ricky!!
RE:The last bastion
by Pop Head on Dec 08, 2007 11:57 PM Permalink
Maybe Modi might keep Gujurat. But do us a favor, declare Gujarat's independence from India. Gujarati ethos is an affront to the nation
RE:RE:The last bastion
by Bhavin Joshi on Dec 09, 2007 12:13 AM Permalink
and there will be queue for independent nations of Tamil nadu, north eastern states, Punjab..etc...
RE:The last bastion
by Pop Head on Dec 09, 2007 12:19 AM Permalink
Tamil Nadu, NE, Punjab etc there would be hard feelings. But not gujurat. So you in an advantage
When the Gujarat elections were announced, the congress was tomtomming that Rahul Gandhi will also tour Gujarat and ensure congress' success. Well, everything is going from bad to worse for congress. Where is their saviour? Is he hiding behind momma's sari? Its not Chak De for Congress. It is Phenk De for them!
RE:Is Rahul Gandhi scared?
by Sanjeevi on Dec 08, 2007 11:12 PM Permalink
When Modi can hide himself in the blood of innocent people when he campaigns ........
RE:RE:Is Rahul Gandhi scared?
by hardeep pathak on Dec 08, 2007 11:24 PM Permalink
see, modi is modi. he dare to talk regarding sorabuddin with open chest. is there any body in congress to talk about afzal's hang out openly. you did not know about modi and gujart, so keep mum now.
RE:Is Rahul Gandhi scared?
by Pop Head on Dec 09, 2007 12:02 AM Permalink
Your Modi not only is capable of calling a pig a pig he can also retract and call a pig a cow. That's what he did in the Sorabuddin case. He acted a bravado during an election meeting, turned coward and denied he ever supported fake encounters.
RE:Is Rahul Gandhi scared?
by Vinal Gandhi on Dec 08, 2007 11:15 PM Permalink
you don't even know how to critize a man! If he is really that bad, he will not hide himself in the blood of innocents! And if you care to remembers, it was TOI and Congress who raised the communal issue first
RE:WHY cong doesnt want to know??
by Pop Head on Dec 09, 2007 12:03 AM Permalink
Iron Man Modi. Why not you set up a steel factory in Gujurat and use Modi as input!
RE:WHY cong doesnt want to know??
by Dalit King on Dec 08, 2007 11:09 PM Permalink
In a jolt to the BJP ahead of the assembly election in Gujarat, senior party leader and former CM Suresh Mehta quit the organisation on Saturday, accusing the top brass of "surrendering" to the whims and fancies of Chief Minister Narendra Modi.
"I am quitting the house (BJP) that I help build into a palace, because it is no more suited for my stay. When I saw that the entire party was surrendering before one person (Narendra Modi) then I thought it was best to quit," he said announcing his resignation at a press conference.
Mehta, who was CM for a brief period in 1995, said that he had dedicated 50 years of his life to help build the party.
RE:WHY cong doesnt want to know??
by Vinal Gandhi on Dec 08, 2007 11:16 PM Permalink
Mehta dedicating 50 years of his life helping build the party? Biggest joke...
RE:RE:WHY cong doesnt want to know??
by john thomas on Dec 08, 2007 11:33 PM Permalink
Dalits are a front for the Church. Just like Cedric Prakash, a liar and an opportunist.
RE:WHY cong doesnt want to know??
by abdul hyderabadi on Dec 08, 2007 11:16 PM Permalink
i think he is your real father because he is iron and you are also iron. both cowords are paper tighers. bledy killers
RE:WHY cong doesnt want to know??
by john thomas on Dec 08, 2007 11:32 PM Permalink
From your great spelling, you must be a Paki. Shoo, go and figure out how to kill some Balochis.
I think we must not make Sonia responsible for any statement she makes about Mahatma, India, Hindu and other matters partaining to our culture and tradition. After all she is only reading the speeches prepared by someone and she may not even be aware of the contents and defenitely the meaning and implications. She does not know about our country at all.
It is in record that even the father of her mother in law, i.e. Jawaharlal Nehru was honest enough to admit his lack of knowledge on indian culture and heritage. Then how anyone expect this poor italian to have any grasp of things. If EC had to take notice of her statments, they have also to haul her speechwriters.
But one is not sure if EC will question her since it is apparent that it is also a Sonia Congress stooge
Inspite of this one sided attitude of EC, it isa miracle that we have some free and fair election and we have to credit our electorate
RE:Sonia, (Khan) Gandhi and India
by vimal shah on Dec 08, 2007 11:06 PM Permalink
Cleaverly Judged that sonia read only what has been prepared by gujarat congress committee
RE:Next in line
by Bhavin Joshi on Dec 08, 2007 11:00 PM Permalink
without any proof u hold.. how could u say lie... so this is in the state between truth-lie...
RE:RE:Next in line
by farid patel on Dec 08, 2007 11:02 PM Permalink
you brought the news so it is on you to present the proof not me! and why do i believe it to be a lie simply becoz the way you present the news as if the muslim world is supporting alqaeda and geared for terrorism exactly how the media portrays it which is a lie obviously
RE:Next in line
by Farid Siddiqui on Dec 08, 2007 11:32 PM Permalink
Like there is no proof that Jesus was really married and had offspring, though some people are suggesting that he was. I think it is all fruitless discussion we slide into. Let us respect each other's religion and leave things at that. I mean are we a bunch of fanatics? What kind of people are we. To have a discussion like this when there are so many issues we should be concentrating our energies and time.
RE:Next in line
by john thomas on Dec 09, 2007 09:44 AM Permalink
Jesus did not exist, so there is no question of his getting married. No, we are not all fanatics. Only the Muslims posting here are fanatics. They keep saying, "But it says in the Koran, x,y and z. Therefore it must be true". That is a mark of fanaticism, because the Koran is just a book, and it is not divine either. It is so full of contradictions that it is clearly human in origin, just like the Bible. Both books are great fiction.
RE:RE:Next in line
by farid patel on Dec 08, 2007 11:06 PM Permalink
who told you that it is blind faith. we have proof. go and read quran for yourself. Allah says that if this quran was from any one beside Allah you would have find many contradiction find one!! No one found since 1400 year ago since it revealed. There are scintific facts in quran which science recently discovered. need more proof go and read Quran without being biased
RE:Next in line
by suresh k on Dec 08, 2007 11:29 PM Permalink
Farid, Who has listened to Allah and who published those books? Was it initially written in blood on an young girls flesh?
RE:RE:Next in line
by john thomas on Dec 08, 2007 11:18 PM Permalink
Just about every verse in the Koran is ridiculous. Enjoy the 'skeptic's annotated quran'. Scientific? ROTFL.
RE:RE:Next in line
by john thomas on Dec 08, 2007 11:16 PM Permalink
or you could type "the skeptic's annotated quran" and see for yourself how absurd it is.
RE:RE:Next in line
by farid patel on Dec 08, 2007 11:15 PM Permalink
type scientific miracles in quran or science and quran in google and find it for yourself
RE:Next in line
by john thomas on Dec 08, 2007 11:30 PM Permalink
Reading the Koran proves nothing. There are plenty of contradictions. It is impossible that it is of divine origin.
RE:killer modi
by john thomas on Dec 08, 2007 11:21 PM Permalink
You guys killed 59 Hindus on a train. Don't forget that while you are getting all sentimental about Muslims. Lots of Hindus remember Godhra.
