Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 761 messages Pages    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:This guy is a congressman
by DCS on Dec 07, 2007 08:22 AM  Permalink
why everybody hates Modi..?
He is next Saddam Hussain...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:This guy is a congressman
by Jigar on Dec 07, 2007 08:25 AM  Permalink
you guys are moron, if some talking against Modi you just link with his MOM or muslim. I think you are the most c- category people in the world.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Modi is megalomaniac
by jamsheed abumohammed on Dec 07, 2007 08:15 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Achyut Yagnik has rightly described Modi as anti-Modi because he is authoritarian, megalomaniac and believes in personality cult. By this he dwarfed seasoned leaders of BJP like Advani and ageing Vajpayee. Such a situation of promoting the megalomaniac as a leader in Gujarat was undoing of BJP leadership. They have allowed the situation to pass out of their hands and they are rubbing in disbelief unable to wriggle out of the situation in which Modi has placed them through him recent comments. When the matter is pending before the supreme court on fake encounter of Shorabudin, the comments by Modi has amounted to contempt of court, admission of guilt, and he must be thrown out immediately from the seat of power. Yagnik has rightly said "There exist three shades among Hindutva forces, soft Hindutva, Modi brand Hindutva and hard Hindutva represented by VHP and the Hindu saints who are opposing Narendra Modi". Its a divided society. More than 20% of Gujaritis live in BPL and did nothing to salvage the sufferings of Dalits, fishermen and others like BPL. He only promoted interest of big industrialists with an eye on their assets and personal gain for himself and his party. He is a deceiver for the people of Gujarat and they will certainly vote him out in the election. Let EC immediately disqualify him from contesting and withhold his elections till the end of justice is met. Such blatant admission of guilt should not unpunished. He must be brought to book immediately by the Court.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
indipendence of INDIA
by b gar on Dec 07, 2007 08:13 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

I think the history was written wrongly, india got indipendence not because of Gandhi, it is because of world war 2, as the half of england destroyed and suffer from manpower and the massive requirement of manpower to rebuild england. they were in a lot of trouble and they can't concentrate on a big country which is being difficult to manage. Thats why they decided to give independence to india, it might not be because of the gandian way, In general it is common sense if u r not demanding with adequate power u can't get anything, so gandian way is total useless and it never proven usefull.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:indipendence of INDIA
by mohan krishnan on Dec 07, 2007 09:28 AM  Permalink
it was both WW II and Ghandiji are responsible for freedom because it was bapuji's idea to call quit india in 1942 as he knew britishers will not give freedom once the war was over. and he knew when to do it. so he struck when iron was hot. that led to the downfall of the britishers not the war itself. then how come we got freedom after gandhi came not before. so credit goes to him also. because of his way only we got freedom. and one thing more there were strikes around the country during the war and none of indian soldiers fought the war. even the britishers knew when the country is united they cannot rule us. even britishers know we got independence because of gandhi. so the history rightly written as it says because of WW II and gandhiji's efforts we got freedom. not solely because WW II.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:indipendence of INDIA
by rajeev on Dec 07, 2007 08:48 AM  Permalink
kudos to b gar for putting things in perspective.british chose to leave not bcs of gandhi but bcs of their own problem.Whaere was gandhism when muslims were slaughtering hindus for partition.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:indipendence of INDIA
by harish gupta on Dec 07, 2007 09:28 AM  Permalink
Truly said...we have been brainwashed by these pseudo seculars...
Winner always writes the history...same thing happened in India...muslim and British destroyed our country and wrote as per their convenience...
Our PM feel proud to say that British raj was good for India...neglecting the contribution of our freedom fighters
No one talk about Lal Bhadur, Sardar Patel, Subhash, Azad, Ashfak, Bhagar singh, Chandrasekhar and may more...
None of human rights activist talk about the Army personals and their family...



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:indipendence of INDIA
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 07, 2007 08:14 AM  Permalink

CORRECT TO A GREAT DEGREE.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Thanks Rediff
by hitesh kumar sharma on Dec 07, 2007 08:11 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Thanks for hating Modi. More you hate him more we will love him.

Guys lets go out and get as many vote for MODI.

Let the English media and their pseudo intellectuals lose and they will know they have no power

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Thanks Rediff
by mehul patel on Dec 07, 2007 08:27 AM  Permalink
All who hates Modi are "Dukhi Atmas". It is in their blood that they can not stand up to strong personality.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Thanks Rediff
by Anurag Shrivastava on Dec 07, 2007 08:31 AM  Permalink
He is a thug not a strong personality. Only fools clap when someone fights shadows.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Thanks Rediff
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 07, 2007 08:13 AM  Permalink

true sir! u said it correctly.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
MAKE SAUDI ARABIA SECULAR DEMOCRACY
by shephard lamb on Dec 07, 2007 08:11 AM  Permalink 

SHAME ON YAGNIK,HE IS A TRUE JIHADI.

HE JUST WANTS MODI GONE BUT DOES NOT CARE FOR THE MILLIONS OF HINDUS KILLED BY MUSLIMS KILLED OVER 1200
YRS AND ALSO THAT MUSLIMS DESTROYED SOMNATH TEMPLE 18 TIMES. OR KASHMIRI HINDUS.

REDIFFF IS SINKING TO NEWER AND LEWER LEVELS EVERYDAY.

LET US JOIN HANDS TO MAKE SAUDI ARABIA WHICH OFFERS NO RELIGIOUS FREEDOM INTO A SECULAR DEMOCRACY AND ALSO PAKISTAN ETC.

LET ALL OF US DO IT.

GENERALLY MUSLIMS CLAIM THEY R PRO SECULAR DEMOCRACY
SO LET US ASK INDIAN MUSLIMS ESPECIALLY ZAKIR NAIK ETC TO HELP ESTABLISH SECULAR DEMOCRACY IN EVERRY MUSLIM COUNTRY.

AL HAM DULL ILLLLAAAHHHHH

    Forward  |  Report abuse
A Typical congress sponsored article
by Sam on Dec 07, 2007 08:08 AM  Permalink 

A Typical congress sponsored article!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Rediff is shameless
by hitesh kumar sharma on Dec 07, 2007 08:06 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Hey rediff you can be biased but his is too blatant. Your journalism sucks....

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Rediff is shameless
by Anurag Shrivastava on Dec 07, 2007 08:12 AM  Permalink
scared of truth, you are.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 07, 2007 08:01 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?

WHAT DOES INDIAN PSUEDO DHIMMI INTELELCTUALS LIKE YAGNIK SAY ON THAT?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by Check Out on Dec 07, 2007 08:06 AM  Permalink
Lets first WE be secular from heart then we can ask SA

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by shephard lamb on Dec 07, 2007 08:20 AM  Permalink

FIRST LET MUSLIMS WHO CLAIM TO LOVE SECULARISM PROVE THEY LOVE SECULARISM BY MAKING SAUDI SECULAR.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by Check Out on Dec 07, 2007 08:36 AM  Permalink
Ones do not claim that they are secular if they are with heart. Its a question of individual NOT Muslim or Hindu.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by hitesh kumar sharma on Dec 07, 2007 08:08 AM  Permalink
So let them be secular for name sake atleast.

In Middle east no Temples and Churches are allowed.

Muslims should learn to accept others and then the can be accepted.

Secular from heart are Muslims in india secular from heart??????????



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by Check Out on Dec 07, 2007 08:27 AM  Permalink
SA is hard core islamic country so temple and churches are not allowed.
I know many muslims living in India side by side with their neighbour belonging to other religion and have no problem to either of them. People like you have a pre-mindset that Muslim do not accept other religion.
Do you want to make India only HINDU contry just like SA. You will never succeed because you will never understand what democracy is?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by hitesh kumar sharma on Dec 07, 2007 08:09 AM  Permalink
In Middle east no Temples and Churches are allowed.


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Dec 07, 2007 08:14 AM  Permalink

BUT BY THEN NON-MUSLIMS WILL BECOME EXTINCT, AND ARABIAN FACISM WILL RULE THE WORLD.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:RE:WHY NOT DEMAND SECULARISM IN SAUDI ARABIA?
by Check Out on Dec 07, 2007 08:39 AM  Permalink
Right now Americans are ruling the world and in past others did. Why we are so insecure of future, lets we all come forward and spread right education among our community/religion the insecurity you have will be resolved.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
25000 HINDUS KILLED IN KASHMIR AND NO WORD ABT IT
by shephard lamb on Dec 07, 2007 07:57 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies


IN 1989 UNDER CONGRESS RULE 25000 HINDUS WERE KOLLED AND 7500000 THROWN OUT OF THEIR OWN HOME BUT ITS OK.

IF MUSLIMS CONSOLIDATE THEIR VOTES UNDER ULEMA MULLAS ITS OK,BUT IF HINDUS CONSOLIDATE THEIR VOTES FOR THEIR OWN SAFETY ITS COMMUNAL.

WHY THIS DOUBLE STANDARD ?

SHUD HINDUS LEAVE INDIA AND GO AWAY SO SAUDI BACKED JIHADIS CAN TAKE OVER ??

WHY ONLY HINDUS HV TO SUUFER ???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:25000 HINDUS KILLED IN KASHMIR AND NO WORD ABT IT
by Imran Nazir on Dec 07, 2007 08:07 AM  Permalink
Ask N. Ram of The Hindu

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:25000 HINDUS KILLED IN KASHMIR AND NO WORD ABT IT
by Check Out on Dec 07, 2007 08:11 AM  Permalink
A maroon people like you has a righ name LAMB. Will religion rule India??
Lets talk about education, Infrastructure, proper health care center...lets lalk against Child labour, Corruption

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:25000 HINDUS KILLED IN KASHMIR AND NO WORD ABT IT
by shephard lamb on Dec 07, 2007 08:23 AM  Permalink


I AM WILLING TO TALK ABT DEVELOPMENT,BUT ALL THE TIME
MUSLIMS REMIND US ABT THEIR JIHAD AND REWARD IN NON EXISTANT JANNAT OF ETERNAL PHYSICAL PLEASURE WITH 72
HOUIRES AND UNLIMITED WINE.

SO,GROW UP U MORON,LET US DESTROY ISLAMO FASCISM FIRST THEN TALK OF OTHER STUFF OR ELSE YR BODY WILL BE BLOW UP TO BITS LIKE SO MANY NON MUSLIMS.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:25000 HINDUS KILLED IN KASHMIR AND NO WORD ABT IT
by Check Out on Dec 07, 2007 09:17 AM  Permalink
DESTROY ISLAMO FASCISM ----HOW??

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 761 messages Pages:    <<  < Newer  | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15   Older >   >>
Write a message