what will happen if the usa controls our foreign policy??????we will go to war with some middle east countries or china,let it be..if we dont get the energy how are we going to run???only if a child has energy can he think cleverly..
Anyways the usa is controlling Indian internal policy by having evangelic corporate Churches in India,which ofcourse means we have to change our foreign policy in future(coz politics will change)..Only difference now we are being forced to change ,then we will happily change...
RE:let the USA control us...
by Sahadevan KK on Aug 24, 2007 01:33 PM Permalink
Mayawati orders closure of Reliance Fresh stores.
Now political parties and people understand what the Left says against the FDI and Corporates in retail sector... 2 crores poor retailers will be finished and 30-40 corporates will conquer the space. We will not have any control on them. BJP and BSP take the steps what the Left has taken.
RE:let the USA control us...
by sangineersha on Aug 24, 2007 12:38 PM Permalink
If we all agree that USA should govern us, than what u say is allright.
Therefor, it is necessary this 123 agreement must be discussed at length with the HYDE act in perview and the resultant objections, week points must be attended to befor the pact is implemented.
I request all the readers - go to google - enter full text of 123 agreement - it will go to the site - there u can select the rediff article - it will connect to the external affairs site and you can read the article 123. The educated mass instead of blaming BJP and calling Yashwant sinha as headless chicken - please read carefully and fire sen, man & bush & co
RE:Islamic India is better
by Senthil Kumar on Aug 24, 2007 12:36 PM Permalink
then you get out and go to saudi / plaestine where the islam was born and enjoy. Do not spoil this country with the bombs.
The muslim rapers/invaders demolished more than one lah temple - from genkiskhan to babar. raped laksh of hindu women, looted this country.
why sikh religion was born, do you know? you people are killing innocent day in day out in the name of allah, did he ask to do that?
in this world first organised terrorism was sponsored by muslims. the entire world knows and we have enough populations and go to gulf that is your swarga bhoomi
RE:Islamic India is better
by shashi pai on Aug 24, 2007 12:39 PM Permalink
who brought islam in india? and why were they made to leave their country of origin? and what was their state of civilization when they left their country? ... just answer these three questions and u will know that just becoz they came to india, they became civilized. if you speak of islam, it originated just approx. 800 yrs ago and if we are going to believe, the koran says that it would not last for more than 9oo yrs.... it seems the prophecy is going to be true, looking at the jehadi culture growing amongst muslims throughout the world..., poor chaps, i deeply feel for them..
RE:RE:Islamic India is better
by sunil kumar on Aug 24, 2007 01:04 PM Permalink
Senthil & Shashi... Dont you think we are reacting to ignorance at the highest level???? I really feel sorry for this guy... Mohammad Dallaullah .... who dosent even know what people are discussing in this forum
RE:RE:RE:Islamic India is better
by Sahadevan KK on Aug 24, 2007 01:24 PM Permalink
Manmohan Singh did a lot for the US; but not for India. Please go to google and search "sahadevan's blogs".
Now everybody started saying the BJP started and they oppose now! It is true that BJP started but not in this form. Just preliminary discussion started and certainly with this condition no real patriot (not left) will accept this.
Some samples for our reader. 01. American will participate in our inside meetings. - who are they to participate in our meetings? is it possible for Indians to participate in their meeting? It means whatever we have the seceracy they will be knowing or there wont be any seceracy.
02. They particiapte alongwith us in the discussion with the other countries for atomic related activities, if those countries refuses then America will be the compramiser and help us to get the deal.- Outside it looks nice - see the cunningness of the americans - They will participate with us - suppose we discuss with Aussie for uranium they will sit with us, why? who are they? if they are with us they get all our informations and plans. secondly as a broker they will help us in deal, that means they wanted to maintain the superioirty and make us to understand that without their help we cannot do anything in atomic field.
These are common rules and not coming under Hyde act, hyde act is still severe...
I can contribute later if rediff is interested!
Only american slaves can support this! Manmohan is coward and does hava guts to say wrong is wrong.
It was Atalji when clinton called him to stopt the kargil war, he told him to advise Pak and India will no
Good relations with America and its Allies the European Union, Japan, South Korea & Taiwan means access to the largest trading bloc in the world - 35 trillion dollars economy/year, technology transfer, jobs & oustourcing, liberal travel regulations etc.
Bad realtionship with Anerica means no more foreign investemnt, no more outsourcing, no jobs, no technology, no american/european/japenese/korean products, nothing. Only Chines Pong-Wong cars & plastic toys & Russian Lada cars & Chernobyl reactors that blow up every week wll be available.
RE:The Pro americal english media!
by sangineersha on Aug 24, 2007 05:20 PM Permalink
Mikky you r really a mouse and behaves like that also. Get into your bill otherwise some cat will eat you. If so afraid of America than go and settle there and don't give ur foolish advice to India.
It seems that the N Deal is between BUSH and Manhmohan and not between USA and India. There intention seems freindly and fair, but once Bush is gone, we may be in soup.
How to close the open interpretation dilemma is a key to the success of this agreement.
As India is not an agressor from any point of view but than very much patriotic to defend ourselves, I suggest Congress, respectable scientist including our Dr. Kalam , Left, Other opposition and representitive member of intelligentsia from other fields including Industry, should sit together with open mind, formulate a strategy on the isuue of Intrepretation dilemma and than present our unanimous view to USA and let them react on this.
Hi folks , I am not sure if the deal is available for the public to read.I am also not certain that ordinary public knows about the clauses of the deals .Most of the politicians might also not be aware of the deal in complete .Their responses are only based on the inputs given by their officers.I believe that the deal is very complicated and in no way we should comrimise our national security .America is known to change the partners in past as well.Burn gave a statement that in 21st century he has seen global power shifting which in turn means that america can even go to some other country with its nuclear deal to counter china.It may be pakistan as well ,who knows.
RE:nuclear deal
by hrishikesh bose on Aug 24, 2007 12:42 PM Permalink
The Deal is available ...Search for 123 Agreement in wikipedia...and follow the links available on the page for this....you will find that
