Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 45 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Let India shine!
by Praveen Kumar on Aug 23, 2007 11:39 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

This Taatakthaiyya Mukherjee is a Hindu fundamentalist. Hey u cheapo Taatakthaiyya, listen to me. India is not progressing as fast as it should because of decrepit, senile, fecus infested dirty, miserable, pathetic, flea infested brains like you. I have been observing u on these blogs for a long time. U just come here to show ur hatred against anything Islamic. Remember that you were kicked and booted out of the CPI. Please shed your hatred and stop poisoning young minds. What do you eat maaan, to have such ahtred filled heart and mind? Grow up, u immature, senile nincompoop. Let us all live in harmony and think of India's progress!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Let India shine!
by Pradip Parekh on Aug 24, 2007 02:05 AM  Permalink
india is progressing despite no-good commies like you, thank you.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
a little intro of Qurrat-ul-ain Hyder
by irfan muzammil on Aug 23, 2007 08:11 AM  Permalink 

For the information of those inane messagers here on rediff devoid of any literary intellect whatsoever, Qurrat-ul-ain Hyder was one of the finest urdu, and in fact , one of the finest writers of the subcontinent in the 20th century. she wrote many many novels, most famous of which is 'aag ka darya' an epic which starts from 400 b.c and concludes at the time of partition, she translated it in english herself with the title of 'river of fire;' most of her novels deals with strong souls broken amidst the partition. she migrated to pakistan after 47, but saddened by the corrupt and self-serving autocracy of pakistan, she went back to india soon after.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
urdu not flowering in india?
by Pradip Parekh on Aug 23, 2007 02:20 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

if yes, that's a good thing. it is impossible to have definitive substantive discourse in urdu, a language-culture designed more to miscommunicate.

well, i didn't get much out of this obituary excpet illustrated weekly had a part time paki lover screening hindu letter writers for publishing. now that would be a bad thing, a real bad thing, no?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:urdu not flowering in india?
by ARQUM MATEEN on Aug 23, 2007 10:10 AM  Permalink
Dear Pradip with all due respect to your erudite observations, let me tell you that Urdu is an Indian language and not a Muslim language. Urdu, which itself was derived from varied languages,is a true representative of the multi cultural traditions of India.
Further the so called Hindi movies are actually using Urdu written in devanagri script.I don't understand why people tend to disown a language which is rightfully ours (and not of Pakistan which itself is nothing but minor blurr in world history, and is bound to get back to where it belonged i.e. India, as it is unable to sustain itself). This beautiful language was usurped by the Pakistanis, but this should not prevent us from giving it's due place in the Indian society.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Qurratulain was representative of bygone Feudal Islamic culture
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Aug 22, 2007 09:05 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Qurratulain was representative of bygone Islamic culture - feudalism, leisure- what is called ANDULOUS SYMDROME.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Qurratulain was representative of bygone Feudal Islamic culture
by bodhisattva sengupta on Aug 23, 2007 12:26 AM  Permalink
Don't know much.. but the "River of Fire" starts from the Ancient Indian period and ends at present time. Its not totally 'feudalistic', as Mr Mukherjee puts it.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Qurratulain was representative of bygone Feudal Islamic culture
by Praveen Kumar on Aug 23, 2007 11:38 AM  Permalink
This Taatakthaiyya Mukherjee is a Hindu fundamentalist. Hey u cheapo Taatakthaiyya, listen to me. India is not progressing as fast as it should because of decrepit, senile, fecus infested dirty, miserable, pathetic, flea infested brains like you. I have been observing u on these blogs for a long time. U just come here to show ur hatred against anything Islamic. Remember that you were kicked and booted out of the CPI. Please shed your hatred and stop poisoning young minds. What do you eat maaan, to have such ahtred filled heart and mind? Grow up, u immature, senile nincompoop. Let us all live in harmony and think of India's progress!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Qurratulain was representative of bygone Feudal Islamic culture
by sumani on Aug 23, 2007 12:03 AM  Permalink
Did you read his work? I have not.

I have read Sunil Ganguly and Bimal Mitra's works. Some of their novel deal with decaying feudalism. Even Sunil's Sha-e Shamoy and Hathat Alo deal with bygone hindu culture -- feudalism and leisure. But again they are novels based on historical events. I do not know anything about the urdu writer, I cannot even pronounce his name. I think I should shut up.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Qurratulain was representative of bygone Feudal Islamic culture
by Tathagata Mukherjee on Aug 23, 2007 09:55 AM  Permalink
Sumani,

Yes, feudalism is shown in Sunil Gangopadhyay's work. But NOT in positive sense. Its portrayed in negative sense.

Close simile of Qurratulain's work can be found in Satyajit Ray's "Satranj Ke Khiladi". Of a decaying, feudal society.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Qurratulain was representative of bygone Feudal Islamic culture
by Siraj Ahmed on Aug 23, 2007 01:00 AM  Permalink
Guys, Qurrat-ul-Ain is a Lady not a Man, I don't know much about Urdu so better to be silent.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 45 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3   Older >
Write a message