RE:Oppose the test clause JUST
by Batman on Aug 22, 2007 02:37 AM Permalink
There is no nuke testing clause. First read 123 agreement n then comment Mukherjee is a rodent who has a fear psychosis of america and a deep rooted inferiority complex.
Dear Sir (Mr. Singhvi), I went through your above passage of "India to go ahead with IAEA negotiations, indicates Cong" & became happy after reading. But I was not satisfied with your self-satisfying falsehood remark that "after the Pokhran tests in 1998, the then prime minister and foreign minister had declared their readiness for a permanent moratorium on nuclear testing. ", which you told so only to save your govt.'s present image, in view of threat perception from your comrade & to keep its head high. After reading this line, I went through all the links given in this website related to that since pokhran test & the remarks by different parties & oppositions over that then & thereafter & found nothing like as you commented, although I knew that you are telling a while lie. It is because, I am a political analyst & judges all matters in an impartial manner, due to no affiliation with any outfit so far. Although I will claim that you are telling a complete lie due to having no documentary proof against such a statement(as given in website in the form of link), but still I will support you on one point that " you are telling a truth but just reverting it". It is because, though there is no link to support your point, but at that time in 1998 I certainly remember that Mr. Vajpayee had told that "If international community wants & they can give the assurance that pakistan will not do nuclear test again, then india is ready for a permanent moratorium".
RE:About Mr. Singhvi's remark over BJP. Bharatiya Janata Party, Singhvi said
by Sanjeev on Aug 22, 2007 03:08 AM Permalink
Devi Prasad..
I guess your research to find the govts statement on nuclear testing moratorium in 1998, wasn't thorough after all !!! Please find the link of the Indian embassy detailing the teext of the speech given by the then PM Sh. ABV to the Indian parliament on 27/05/1998.
Please see Point#14 of the speech of the Prime Minister.
Most of the commies Headless Chickens are aged betwen 70 and 90. So the only hope is almost 80 % of these Headless Chickens will die in da next 5 to 10 years. We all are lookin for some real Divali ahead whn these commie Headless Chickens will die. Lez hope for the best.
Because, Ba$$tard$ only know to shout NO NO...HA HA HA.....
If the nuke deal is bad...They should have opposed long back and submitted alternate options to India's growing energy need. They didn't. Because, Ba$$tard$ only know to shout NO NO...HA HA HA.....
If the same 123Nuke deal had happened with China, they would have been bery proud of their FCUKKING hertitage...
No wonder why BENGALIS AND KERALITES are fleeing their state to work somewhere...
LEFTS made millions poor...many to beg in WB and Kerala.....
Strip LEFTIST'S Indian citizenship and kick them into China....So that they can go and screw China...If they do, they will end up getting single bullet into their head and mouth in China...
I think of taking commie airlines & bjp airlines, but the options are very limited: Commie Airlines will go only Beijing & via stopover in Shangai. BJP only has domestic airlines now a days.
Yes...India needs to be worried about the communists, Al Qaeda and Terrorism, in that order, as Commies are doing to India what the explosions in Mumbai cud not do. Commies are the sleeper cells of Foreign agents who are sitting inn the parliament to do reportings to their masters in China and pakistan and do their biddings. Commies who takes China before their country are the most extreme Traitors that india can ever see...Indians should not be taken in by their crocodile tears which falls when their masters are not happy. These commies who take their pay packets from Communist China, have to talk against this N-deal as its a compulsion for them. They cant see India progress...Thats it
RE:India should be wary of the commies and Al Qaeda in that order
by Batman on Aug 22, 2007 12:32 AM Permalink
Only 2 nations in the whole world are opposing this Indo US nuclear deal, China and Pakistan.... China has the Most Favored NAtion status with the US and opposes the same status for India. China has got a similar nuclear deal with the US bt opposes the deal with India... Jyoiti Basu of CPM protested against Indian defence againt chinese invasion of india in 1962 and was jailed by Nehru for anti India activities. Basu went on to become the CM of bengal. Commies never condemn Chinese claim of arunachal Pradesh whn the people themselves want top be part of India.. CPM opposes Indian nuclear progress bt has no problems with Chinas nuclear arming of pakistan whch are targeted towards India and supports iranian nuclear program. The communists oppose ndustrialiazation in India and went on killing 100's of poor farmers in Singur and Nandigram tryin to grab farmers fertile land for setting up industries. Commies are ruling bengal for more than 30 years now and have reduced bengal from being the finest to being the poorest.. Only big industry in commie ruled states bangal and kerala are trade unions and their number one product is strikes and bandh. Commies vociferously opposed introduction of computers by rajiv gandhi, commies cald computers as evil and against national interest. Commies neva condemned chinese invasion of India in 1962. Commies do not recognize aksai chin in kashmir as part of india. And yes the commies got a new name now "Headless Chickens and Spineless Morons".
RE:RE:Instead of signing the 123 Agreement with USA
by andrew smith on Aug 22, 2007 12:13 AM Permalink
Alredy 123 agrement is made in English and the wordings made a lot of fuss.
Well chinese will make it in chinese.So congress cannot read read it.
Communists who are experts on the other hand cannot differentiate between 123 and 12345 as both look same for them.
RE:Instead of signing the 123 Agreement with USA
by mr on Aug 22, 2007 12:28 AM Permalink
So, you mean to say we can write 12345 with 3 letters (123) in chinese?
