Friends, who are these left that are opposing the Nuke deal - lets get to some history about them.. 1. These left are the same people who had got several Indian freedom fighter arrested during World War 2, 1945-46, at Soviet Russia's instance.
2. these Left are the very same people who had taken China's side when 1967 Indo-Chinese war broke out.
3. Today they want to stop the Nuke deal the the instance of China's Communist party.
Can we Indians trust these very same Left with India's national interest ? Think yourself after carefully going thru history.
I am a true and real SLAVE of yours. I cleaned your shit and now ready to eat. But the bloody illeterate communists and nationalists BJP parties are giving me trouble to sign the paper prepared by you and your house. I am pretty sure some-day I will make these bloody communists bent down and whole Indians will clean yours' shit. You keep faith on me, I have done everything whatever you and your companies told me to do before coming to PM position.
Bush: I have full confidence and trust you, my baby. I will NOT find better SLAVE than you.
RE:Manmahan Singh (SLAVE PM) and Bush COnversation
by Shiv Shankar on Aug 21, 2007 05:24 AM Permalink
The real slaves are commies, who traditionally had been more loyal to China and USSR. After the dismemberment of USSR and China started doing business with USA. They started acting like new born patriots obstructing everything in the name of their new found country. I believe they are actualy having identity crisis and they started being cry babies whether it is concerning nuclearization of Iran and Indo-US nuclear deal. Otherwise how can we explain their tantrums. Nationality and patriotism are alien to Commies and they have always been full of extraterritorial loyalties. This nuclear deal is good for India's civilian needs with rising gas prices, unless commies can force Arabs to give oil with discounts through their mullahs. Even then it would cause more pollution. I think even BJP which toed US line in the first place is opposing because it does not want Congress to get credit for this. evethough I am not a great favorate of Congress and really proBJP, I am Indian first and I like this treaty beyond political oppertunitists and their whims and selfish motives. If we can reprocess and have right to test, why not?
RE:Manmahan Singh (SLAVE PM) and Bush COnversation
by us on Aug 21, 2007 09:41 AM Permalink
Manmahan SIngh implemented everything what Bush and USA told him to do it. He was neither a good Economist nor a Administrator, but merely a teacher. If he would have been a real good economist, he could curve down the inflation and endless price-rise of everything.
He thought and thinking, he can make India economically strong. Just increasing forex reserve you a Country can not become a rich or economically strong country. Under the present Govt, people (particularly commom people who are 80-85%) are suffered/surrering more than imagination. Should India run just by 15-20% people in a so called economically strong country ?
My freind remember: Americans think, Bush will be THE WORST President of their nation. I strongly belive MMSingh is also THE WORST PM of India, spineless creature.
Let India go for the nuclear deal, but should have a gut for its own nuclear assets and tests. It should have guts to resist USA if they try to impose Sanctions. After Pokhran test it was Vajpayee who cleverly managed all US sanctions. That is not possible by MMSingh or any congress power-hunger, Sonia licker.
