Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 207 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Prakash Karat and His wife both are chinese and anti-nationals.
by Amit Kumar on Aug 31, 2007 09:21 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Prakash Karat and his bandriya wife => Brinda karat should practise socialism.Open their bank acccount and let us see what is in it.

Brinda Karat is a media hog.She was after Ramdev the great man and the ignoramus eccentric woman was silenced by Ramdev for good.
So is her Husband -> Prakash Karat.Both are chinese agents.

Get out of parliament Karats.You are a disgrace to India.You chinese thugs.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Prakash Karat and His wife both are chinese and anti-nationals.
by Anuj Kumar Singh on Sep 03, 2007 08:38 PM  Permalink
These chinese agent can't see india in progress. If anybody says that India is shining then they will become angry. They want India should give up Arunachal pradesh to China. And China is close friend of Pakistani. So these leaders are indirect Pakistani supporter. They must be hanged for the alligation like attack on parliament. All of them are Desh drohi, They are nexalites. (CPI- Chinese party against India) or Chinese people of India (Manoos)
Check 123 agreement : 123 Agreement : http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2007/aug/90050.htm

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Prakash Karat and His wife both are chinese and anti-nationals.
by Hate Who divides on Jul 03, 2008 10:38 PM  Permalink
Can you tell me why USA didnot signed CTBT and always force others to CTBT and dont write any crap if you dont know about the topic .......... for kindly information US will never go in deal if they dont have their national interest and Strategies .............and you are saying we should commit sucide

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Prakash Karat and His wife both are chinese and anti-nationals.
by Shailesh Tripathi on Sep 13, 2007 12:58 PM  Permalink
Its a shame that you can't even understand what is being debated. It is not Karat or Cinese agents or CIA agents.

We are trying to have the parliament discuss this issue of Nuclear treaty in detail. What is the problem with this discussion and if there is one why do we call ourselves a democracy and what do we have the parliament for!

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Left is a MINORITY DICTATORSHIP in India
by Sreelekha Nair on Aug 23, 2007 11:37 AM  Permalink 

Left believes in -
a. taking this country (India) to ransom at the instance of their masters in China.
b. They believe in miniscule minority opinion buldozing majoirty views.
c. Even withing their own party CPIM (read Chinese party in India), they stifle Buddhadev, Jyoti Basu's opinions.
d. Left's Karat and Bardhan are nothing but dicators who work on orders received from China.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re-call the diplomat!
by Gautam nil on Aug 23, 2007 03:55 AM  Permalink 

He is aware of several high handed roles of US, purely in its own selfish reasons as its defence measures, being an experienced diplomat! For instance, without an aorta of truth in its claim about Iraq's possession of the so called widely published "weapons of mass destruction", U.S. massacred Saddam Hussain and other several thousands of innocent people, inclusive of his own soldiers just to get oil, as exposed by U.N. observers, due to which U.S. earned wide criticism from almost all over the world with protest rallies from several nations inclusive of their own people! This is just one instance, whereas the world history shows their unwarranted interference into local affairs of several nations like Afghanisthan, Israel-Palestine, India-Pakistan, Iran and North-South Korea, etc., They supply arms and ammunitions, inclusive of sophisticated bomber fighter planes with highest modern latest technology etc., to Pakistan on one side besides huge amounts as packages etc., and plead for truce and peace between India and Pakistan! All such are wicked activities purely in their selfish interests due to a fear of attack on them by other nations!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re-call the diplomat!
by Gautam nil on Aug 23, 2007 03:53 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

It is Sen's intoxication of position and status that was responsible for such naked arrogance displayed by him towards even media persons as he claimed! He has got no business to call any one as "headless chicken"! Further, his blatant lie to deny his reported statement in personal capacity is merely a thought over "eye wash" and hence an attempt to escape from his expose of ego that has been now exposed by the affirmation of the reporter about his definite pronouncement. Perhaps, he has exposed himself by such unwarranted comments that depicted him as an "head less chick"!
Such arrogant person, enjoying all amenities and honours due to Indian Nation, should be cut to size to make him realize his real position as another human to honour every life with respect and regard, which is the ultimate purpose of education!
Perhaps, his tall education and vast experience haven't contributed adequately to arrive at a judicious decision by preferring to nuke energy than national security!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Re-call the diplomat!
by Nostra Damus on Jun 19, 2008 07:23 PM  Permalink
Maybe after retirement, he family will settle in USA and he would get the post of chief coordinator of India-US Nuclear Deal. After all, isnt their self interest the prime interest of our Foreign Service Babus, even at the cost of the nation? No wonder Indians are treated as dirt in foreign countries.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re-call the diplomat!
by Gautam nil on Aug 23, 2007 03:52 AM  Permalink 

As US. is cunning with India too as we saw in their sustained role in India - Pak relations, they have proved to be most untrustworthy by such past activities in the entire world! India can never trust such a notorious nation! On the name of nuke fuel, they may manage to enter into our defence nuke installations to spy which might cost heavily later, if we are not avoiding any deal with U.S. especially on nuke matters or any concerning our defence matters.
Perhaps, the diplomat is well influenced by provision of sophisticated amenities and other modern facilities by U.S. to push through, their well thought over scheme to enter into such area to subsequently show their true colors! When U.N. is incapable to confront U.S., can India alone face such most unreliable threats of war etc., subsequently?
It is under these circumstances that immediate recall of the diplomat with immediate termination of this dangerous agreement is most vital, keeping our national security as the upper most priority than energy consideration! I doubt his return too as perhaps, he might prefer to stay back to settle in U.S. permanently!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
Re-call the diplomat!
by Gautam nil on Aug 23, 2007 03:51 AM  Permalink 

As US. is cunning with India too as we saw in their sustained role in India - Pak relations, they have proved to be most untrustworthy by such past activities in the entire world! India can never trust such a notorious nation! On the name of nuke fuel, they may manage to enter into our defence nuke installations to spy which might cost heavily later, if we are not avoiding any deal with U.S. especially on nuke matters or any concerning our defence matters.
Perhaps, the diplomat is well influenced by provision of sophisticated amenities and other modern facilities by U.S. to push through, their well thought over scheme to enter into such area to subsequently show their true colors! When U.N. is incapable to confront U.S., can India alone face such most unreliable threats of war etc., subsequently?
It is under these circumstances that immediate recall of the diplomat with immediate termination of this dangerous agreement is most vital, keeping our national security as the upper most priority than energy consideration! I doubt his return too as perhaps, he might prefer to stay back to settle in U.S. permanently!


    Forward  |  Report abuse
what happens to hyde act if 123 is shelved?
by Pradip Parekh on Aug 23, 2007 02:38 AM  Permalink 

hyde act is 123 specific, isn't it? the best thing to do then is start all over, now that hyde has retired.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
This deal is not about one political party!.
by Shadow on Aug 22, 2007 07:25 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

This deal is not about Congress, the Left or the BJP. This deal is not about communism or socialism or capitalism. This deal is not about personal ego or politics morons. This deal is about India's future. Her (India) ability to carry out nuclear tests and still be part of the NSG. Her (India) ability to secure her long term energy future without compromising on sovereign rights. Her (India) skill to get into a deal without compromising her future. All those moro..ns out there and equate China with evil, US as saviour and BJP as stupid opposition are grossly mistaken. This is not about china or US or any other states. It is pure and simply our ability to get into a deal in our terms. Dont blame the left, dont blame the BJP or communism or capitalism or socialism. It is purely a test for our netas and babus (the current ruling ones) to strike and get into a deal which doesn't compromise our ability to do a nuclear test as everyone might remember that we are not a signatory to CTBT and / or NPT. The deal is off if test is done and we agree to it, it tantamounts to signing the CTBT indirectly. All the 5 veto weilding nuclear countries have a one - sided law favoring them and India should become 6 with ability to test and still be part of the NSG PERIOD!.

This deal is about India. So, think like an Indian, not as left, right or center. Analyze this issue in objective manner!. Does this deal address all the concerns of India? If not, renegotiate or step out of the deal?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:This deal is not about one political party!.
by Prem Chandra on Oct 29, 2007 01:05 AM  Permalink
yes I agreee fully with your wise analysis. Keep it propagating


   Forward   |   Report abuse
The Interview with M K Bhadrakumar.
by KS S on Aug 22, 2007 10:03 AM  Permalink 

Remarkable. I was under the impression that this gentleman has the interests of India in mind. He suggests that we should not be supplicant to US but must do everything to please China. I am dsappointed and disgusted.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
sss
by Sahadevan KK on Aug 21, 2007 04:00 PM  Permalink 

sss

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 207 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message