Bharatvarsh is slowly but certainly being pushed into the privatization of nuclear energy.
As is the case with the communications (read mobile), quite a major chunk of our nuclear energy establishments could, in not too distant a future, be under direct control and ownership of some American conglomerates.
This could happen.
The thieves, the prostitutes and the amichands would facilitate the Americans, or any other outsiders who can swell the former's swiss accounts.
Ultimately, with the assistance and facilitation of the communities mentioned earlier, even the nuclear arsenal of the nation may also be outsourced with the buttons in the Neanderthaal's office in Oval who will take calls only and exclusively originating from the naaaapaaaak.
Bharatvarsh ki parjaa ko apni neend se jaag jaana chaaheeye.
Fir se gulami aa sakati hai.
The thieves, the prostitutes and the amichands are keenly encashing the rashtrasampatti for their own personal benefits rather than the common good of the people of the country.
When you would like to fight against both communal BJP and corrupted Congress, please read my blogs on http://sahadevan.blogspot.com/ by
Sahadevan KK on Aug 18, 2007 10:03 AM Permalink| Hide replies | Hide message
When you would like to fight against both communal BJP and corrupted Congress, please read my blogs on http://sahadevan.blogspot.com/
Those who are praising the agreement , it appears have not read the agreement even once. How will we push back once we solely depend on american nuke supply ? Under no circusmatnces we can take stand against america and we will become puppet country to USA like paksitan was in 1970s
RE:India should not depend on USA
by Prem Mohan on Aug 18, 2007 09:25 AM Permalink
You do not solely have to depend on the U.S. There are other suppliers of nuclear reactors including France and Russia. This agreement will open the doors to nuclear co-operation with several countries.
RE:India should not depend on USA
by ezra singh on Aug 18, 2007 09:49 AM Permalink
It is fine that u get Uranium supplies from Russia but what about maintenance and parts? Presently only US can supply to its equipment supplied to us. Even Europe - France &UK under US influence will not service them.
RE:RE:India should not depend on USA
by manoo kaushal on Aug 18, 2007 09:27 AM Permalink
I disgree completely with you when our industry solely depend upon material of USA no governmenet in power can dare test nukes even if it is very much needed because of China.
RE:RE:RE:India should not depend on USA
by manoo kaushal on Aug 18, 2007 09:29 AM Permalink
for your kind information australia already had put restraints of NPT and you know importance of Australia in Uranium supply ..it holds 50 % resserves
RE:RE:RE:RE:India should not depend on USA
by Aftab on Aug 18, 2007 09:39 AM Permalink
India can deal with Australia. This is their first reaction and we may see some more wild reactions in days to come.These will be resolved after all nuclear fuel is a big business and Australia also needs business.
RE:India should not depend on USA
by Aftab on Aug 18, 2007 09:36 AM Permalink
An agreement or a deal is basically a win win situation. It must be noted that with economic strides that India has taken and the intellectual power that we have , Indiawas all through in a driving seat and my congratulation to the team of negotiators and Dr Manmohan Singh for getting the best inthe situation. If we see it in totality India stands to gain. Even BJP and Left have not been able to say a word against the deal. Their worry is that our foreign policy will be affected and influenced by America.
Let us not be under the illusion that our foreign policy is non aligned. It was either anti America and now pro America and there is no harm in doing so if it suits us.
RE:India should not depend on USA
by manoo kaushal on Aug 18, 2007 09:51 AM Permalink
should we sign NPT like agreement first and then we should deal with Australia ? Its like saying we should handover gun to enemy and then think about fighting with him ! Manmohan is cheating ..Our throium based reactors are nearing completion why show so much haste ? He is trying to act smart
Hi, I am not very clear. What is the Opposition and Left Parties worried about. What are the problems in going ahead with this deal. I am sorry. I have not been following the news. I want to understand what is the benefits & problems in going ahead with this deal.
RE:What is this about?
by manoo kaushal on Aug 18, 2007 09:23 AM Permalink
Read 123 agreement in light of Hyde act ..o your homework properly and then come here and debate ! you people heavily rely on media and lack your own independent ways of thinking. And that is why country is easily befooled by people like Manmohan.
RE:What is this about?
by Richard Chang on Aug 18, 2007 09:28 AM Permalink
Hello Sir, I am not debating. I think you never understood what I said. I said that I don't know anything about the agreement. I just want to understand the pros and cons of the agreement and why is the Opposition opposing it. I will be glad if you can explain it to me or atleast point me to the exact source.
RE:RE:What is this about?
by manoo kaushal on Aug 18, 2007 09:42 AM Permalink
Read how Manmohan is trying to bluff the country with half cooked facts. Read it yourself in light of hyde act and how America have been behaving with their all treaties with India in the past be it Tarapur or be it LCA
this deal is going to help us in energy which is the highest requirement if economy has to run at 10% the jobs created would be able to solve our unemployment problems.if one thinks INDIA is bargaining its security its nonsense because money earned after effect of this deal can be used for our defence,research why think of nuclear deterrent think of economic deterrent let us first be strong enough to have our own air defence system,tanks, and naval fleet that is indigeneously built.all this thing need huge money and this can be achieved only by strong economic growth thus need of energy thus need of this nuclear deal people talk of corruption why since we dont have the right to do so because if all literate voters have voted without thinking of religion,caste,language but only according to character of candidate today INDIA would have been much powerful that even we could have thought lets not make this mistake again now vote only to the best candidate. this deal is going to benefit us in long way and help in solve our power problems. be united in supporting this deal on all platforms let your voice go to parliament. JAIHIND
RE:necessity of india-us nuclear deal
by manoo kaushal on Aug 18, 2007 09:14 AM Permalink
rubbish ..can we sabotage our nuclear programme to depend completely on USA ? Will we be free and sovereign nation thereafter ?
RE:necessity of india-us nuclear deal
by mandhir juneja on Aug 18, 2007 04:47 PM Permalink
you are a fool and hardly understand the complexity of the situation. With malicious intents you are unnecessarily trying to put question marks on the integrity of a PM who has an unblemished record and has always kept the nation above the petty politics. if you cant see that i can only say that you are sick. people like you also made a lot of hue and cry when Manmohan had opened the economy in 1991. Every one opposed it but the mans vision has trandformed into a reality today and helping is millions of indians to move ahead in life. The deal is clearly beneficial for India more than the US. It will help us in generating enough power to meet the needs of the power hungry economy, it will help us leapfrog into latest nuclear technology which other wise on our own would take donkeys years to develop. It will open up the entire NSG market for us. We can in any case conduct test in future and the US will put sanctions which they will any ways do whether an agreement is there or not. I can go on and on on this but I think i would just be wasting my time for people like you.
RE:necessity of india-us nuclear deal
by Prem Mohan on Aug 18, 2007 09:19 AM Permalink
In today's world, free and sovereign nations are also interdependent by way of trade, commerce, treaties and international obligations. However, the choice is ours. If you are right, we should not import any technology as that makes us dependent on others. We can choose the path of complete self-sufficiency, just like North Korea.
RE:Indo US Nuclear deal
by Prem Mohan on Aug 18, 2007 09:12 AM Permalink
What did Mr Gorbachev do to Russia (or rather the Soviet Union)? The Soviet Union collapsed under the weight of its heavy spending on arms and its inefficient industrial and agricultural sectors. Mr Gorbachev just happened to be there.
