ITS HIGHLY ADVISABLE THAT THE CONGRESS PARTY & THE BJJP PART JOINTLY PASS THE DEAL.
ALL COUNTRIES THAT ARE ALLIED WITH AMERICA ARE PROSPEROUS. EG. GERMANY, JAPAN, U.K. TAIWAN, SOUTH KOREA.
AMERICA IS ALL POWERFUL. THE E.U., JAPAN, TAIWAN & SOUTH KOREA FULLY SUPPORT THE USA. RUSSIAN & CHINA KEEP QUIET AS THEIR FOREIGN INVESTMENT COMES FROM USA, E.U. & JAPAN.
ALL THOSE WHO TRIFLE WITH AMERCIA WILL BE FORCED TO INHABIT MUD-HUTS LIKE CUBA, SYRIA, LIBYA, SUDAN, SOMALIA, NORTH KOREA.
We need massive energy to meet our growing demand. We need nuclear power to meet the demand, since we can't the demand only with thermal or hydel power projects.So what is the alternative if we don't sign civil nuclear program?
Or can we go back to 18th century and live without electricity power (Like in west bengal)
RE:what is the alternative?
by satishkumar s on Aug 17, 2007 05:10 PM Permalink
i agreed with u totaly its very much needed to make some solution for power problems which india going to face in future there are severl alternatives rather going with this deal where hear they are trying to tie our hands in a form of a agreement where i think manmohan thinking to stop r stop testing of nuck weapons for next 40 to 50 years just he like to give some time for economy to grow but some artical teeling its main intention is to pressure india to drop ICBM where its dirctly targeting them and its gives equal status for india statistically there u dont have any other way other then rejecting this they are prety well calculative to penetrate in indian missile and ICBM tech where its bigest thread for us in long run so india dont have any way to make any other alternatives then compromising their security which is one and only safeguard india have
In the current situation, Whichever be the party ruling (Government of) India will certainly dance to the tune of USA and none of the parties have the guts to oppose USA on any matters; if any one of the parties really have the spine and guts and braveness, they should have forced the ruling party to not to sign on this when USA President George Bush was here only to sign this contract. China is nothing to do with this deal and China doesnt even care about this kind of rubbish deals; that's why China's didnt pay much attention on this. China knows well that USA cant even ask China like this kind of deal; USA also pretty well knew that they cant even say to China like this. Entire world know on how cowards we Indians are after great MKG's "Ahimasa/Sathyagraha" policies broken the spine/backbone of Indians in 1920s itself. If you want example, see on how Government of India bowed down to the terrorist after IC aircraft was hijacked to Kandhahar in Dec 1999 and all the criminal ruthless terrorists were released from the prison and our external minister Jaswanthsingh escorted them to Afgan. This alone is more than enough to show our cowardness to the world; then, how could we expect our Government of India to oppose any deals from USA?
RE:Nuclear deal
by Venkat on Aug 17, 2007 02:57 PM Permalink
HATS OFF DRAGON, IN INDIA V BOW TO THE DIKTATS OF A ITALIAN BORN LADY N DONT MIND EVEN IF SHE IS THE PM , WHAT WILL POOR MANMOHAN DO HE IS A PUPPET TO SONIA IN INDIA FIRST BEFORE BECOMING A PUPPET TO US, THE WHOLE NATION HAS BEEN TAKEN AS A HOSTAGE TO SONIA N HER RULE, SHE IS AN AMERICAN CIA AGENT , BEWARE WE WILL BE SOLD TO US VERY SOON, ONLY GOD SHOULD GIVE SENSE TO THINK N ACT, VANDEMATHARAM,
Friday, August 17, 2007 (Mumbai) A man of Iranian origin, born and living in India, has been denied an Indian passport and ordered to be deported.
The 30-year-old changed his name to Krishna hoping to stay in the country of his birth, India. That name may however lead to torture in the country of his origin- Iran.
Born and brought up in Mumbai to Iranian parents, Hassan Ali Raihani applied for Indian citizenship in 2003 after the death of his father.
On December 15, 2003, the Maharashtra government accepted his request with certain conditions.
But four years later he received another notification to leave the country.
In desperation, Krishna moved the High Court to remain in India only to be told that the court could not interfere with the decisions taken by the executive.
Raihani converted to Hinduism during his residence in India. But Iran is an Islamic state and under Shariat law, apostasy or conversion to any religion from Islam is an offence punishable by death. That means, if Raihani is deported to Iran he faces the death penalty.
The possibility looked imminent as on Friday as he was about to be deported after spending three days in the airport's immigration cell.
However, the United Nations High Commission for refugees has asked the High Court for a stay order on his deportation to determine if Krishna qualified as a refugee and can be sent to a third country instead.
Under United Nations guidelines, if an individual lives outside his country but cannot retur
RE:what we can do abot this?? on ndtv.com
by Mikkey Moouse on Aug 17, 2007 02:47 PM Permalink
WHOOPS.....HE'S GONNA LOSE HIS HEAD ! IRAN IS NOT A SECULAR COUNTRY LIKE AMERICA.
RE:Bring bak BJP to power in next general elections !
by Raj on Aug 17, 2007 02:51 PM Permalink
Dear Deepak, Our country strives on our secular identity. The day we differentiate India based on religion or caste (hindus, muslims, christians. Jains, Kshatriyas) our values are at stake. Learn from the many mistakes already made.
RE:Bring bak BJP to power in next general elections !
by Teesmar Khan on Aug 17, 2007 02:45 PM Permalink
Yes sir. Nation's interests can remain safe in the hands of only those leaders who are patriot from the heart. Only BJP comes true on this criterion. We must bring Atalji or Narendra Modi as P.M. after next elections.
RE:RE:Bring bak BJP to power in next general elections !
by zunil p John on Aug 17, 2007 02:54 PM Permalink
If BJP comes back 1. We will have more kargils where terrorists occupy Indian soil nad we have to give 600 brave soldiers to get taht back. George Fernandez, the now talking man, was the defence minister. 2. Indian foreign minister(this time may be PM itself) will accompany dreaded terrorists in Chartered flight to Kandahar to give them safe journey. I don't know whether in World History did any nations(small or big) rulers did such an act. 3. We will bargain for commission on the coffins for our soldiers(Coffin scam) . George fernandez was defence minister 4. We may have more TEhelka exposals where George Fernandez party chief openly asking money for arms deal.
You need more?? What NDA did in their rule? "Shining India" campaign.
Your message and its language itself shows that you are not belonging to this great Nation and its culture.
RE:RE:RE:RE:Bring bak BJP to power in next general elections !
by zunil p John on Aug 17, 2007 03:35 PM Permalink
Hi Amit, I ma replying to the heading. Whether its Congress or BJP or nay other party, this si same. But I will still tell, BJP did some of the dreaded things which no other party will do(eg : Escorting terrorists). Also many points raised by you is not valid. 1.If you tell that, Gujarat riots were because of the backlash of Godhra killings, the same rule can apply to Sikh riots also. 2. Indiar created Sikh issue. But she only destroyed it. She has that guts. 3."militants were exchanged for Mufti's daughter when she was kidnapped ". Who exchanged??? Congress or BJP?? 4. " Rajiv Gandhi killed more than 1000 defence people because of his stupidity in Sri Lanka. ". I still think that wsa right. Tomorrow also when such a situation arises, India may do the same thing gain whether UPA or NDA. Because otherwise US or UK or some such countries(even China) will make use of that oppertunity and that will be big threat to INdia.
So don't try to cover one shame with another shame
Why is it Congress is taking Loose Toungued Fernades seriously?. He is of no value in our Democratic set-up. His tricks of the trade has been through-out his political career of talking cheap & promoting "workers mentality".
Yes, one need to read between the line that he is talking on behalf of his friends in China; that is a serious issue and clue to that who is against Indo-US Civil Nuclear Pact?.
What is needed is Shivsena Chief Bal Thackery effect "kick-him-on his-back", when he went to Mr. Thakcery for Shiv Sena support for NDA lead BS Shekhawat candidature for the post of just concluded election to President of India, which Madam Pratibha Patil won hands down.
India-US Pact also is a walk-over and it is for the good of the both the countries.
RE:LOOSE TOUNGUE FERNADES SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN SERIOUS.
by prashant chauhan on Aug 17, 2007 02:56 PM Permalink
U r reacting about the loose lakt of farnandes...but dont utter a word tht y our respectable primeminister is misleading whole country....on the occesion of our 60th independence day... USA is denying the statement which is given by our prime minister in parliyament.... means either manmonsingh is lying or Bush... and u r more worried about loose talk of mr farnandes.... have u heard that share.....
jaalim chhuri gardan pe chalaa ke bolaa... miyaaan chillaaate kyu ho.....
RE:LOOSE TOUNGUE FERNADES SHOULD NEVER BE TAKEN SERIOUS.
by Srinivas R on Aug 17, 2007 02:59 PM Permalink
For India's sake dont talk of Shiv Sena. They have turned M'rashtra into Pak within India. They were accusing Dr Kalam for not approving afzal guru's hanging and they have supported congress who is actually protecting afzal in choosing a corrupt president. Where is Hindutva? Where is patriotism??
Instead of targeting our gentleman PM, George should have tageted Sonia Gandhi, the soul of UPA, under whose behest PM had to sign the deal . He is merely a victim of circumstances .
It is now clear that (Wo)man mohan Singh has utterly failed in keeping his words given to Parliament and whole nation that he will not make a deal which will go against intersts of our country. He must opologise for the same and deal 123 mst be revised if not fully revoked.
George is a patriot and let there be no doubts on it. The 123 Nuke deal has been forced on our Pm and now he is struggling to defend it. Certinly they are hiding something in the whole deal.
RE:123 deal and georges statement
by ss on Aug 17, 2007 02:40 PM Permalink
He is a fail patriot. He should be happy he is in india. Had it been china, he wouldn't have been among us today.
RE:123 deal and georges statement
by Devaiah Palekanda on Aug 17, 2007 03:36 PM Permalink
Why are you addressing your father. Use civilised language or QUIT
RE:RE:RE:123 deal and georges statement
by Teesmar Khan on Aug 17, 2007 04:29 PM Permalink
Who told you that George was an spy. Remeber once he said clearly that China is not at all believable. George is more aptriotic than any of communists and congressmen.
RE:123 deal and georges statement
by Teesmar Khan on Aug 17, 2007 02:35 PM Permalink
Yes, my brother. I was once supporter of such deal. But whatever is coming out of it, it is very-very clear that they have hidden a lot from the country.
RE:RE:123 deal and georges statement
by Jitendra Kumar on Aug 17, 2007 03:39 PM Permalink
What difference it makes if you do not support this agreement nobody will come to you for your support. Bol to aise raha hai jaise Bush aur Manmohan ke baad tumahara hi number aata hai
RE:123 deal and georges statement
by Vijay Singhal on Aug 17, 2007 04:26 PM Permalink
Yes Mister. Because I speak from my heart and mind. For me, nation is first, rest is later.
