Dear Sir, All said and done,before we proceed further let us understand the basic defference in N-Deal(123 agreement/Hide Act) and Imperial Rule. When British came to India,they also entered in trade agreement with Mughals.Thus East India Co. was established.What happened ? With the passes of time the Mughals rulers became week and lost their empire to East India Co.For a common man it hardly maters whether he is ruled by black or white.He has to live on his day to day earnings and leave his generations to repeat the same in their lives. Many poor and down trodens still feel that British Rule was better then so called SAVRAJ. Coming down to 123 agreement with USA,No doubt it will give energy which can improve the lot of our poor and down trodens ang provides electricity to our villages and factories,but at what cost.Cost would be:
1/. We would have no say in our foreign policy,it would be decided by USA there after.We had no better situation during British rule.
2/. Our so called Secular policy would die, sooner we vote for USA against IRAN.
3/. British have looted us in the name of trade and improvement.USA is doing same thing to capture our assets easily inlieu of so called N-reactor and fuel supply in future.
4/. Indian elites had enjoyed in British Rule and again they will and share the booty in return of their support.
Then question arises as to why we fought and got indep
RE:N-Deal and Dr.Singh vis-a-vis Left.
by brij tyagi on Aug 27, 2007 11:51 AM Permalink
In coninuation:
Question arises ,why we fought for independence.It is becouse the poor and down trodens had awakened or it is becouse MAA INDIA wanted to be Librated? Need less to say ,if there is mid-term poll,it is Left who is going to be benefitted maxmum,and it is Congress who will become villain. Before it is too late,UPA chair person must understand the feelings of AMM AADMI,who out rightly reject this N-Deal with USA.
RE:necular deal
by Bipin Musale on Sep 14, 2007 10:47 AM Permalink
If the Nuke deal takes place and the production of electricity is multiplied manifold would it guarantee that a common man will benefit from this? Again the lion's share would go to the govt and its vested interests and perhaps no solution to the problem of load shedding
RE:Nuclear Energy - Drawbacks
by SANJAY BHARGAVA on Aug 24, 2007 06:47 AM Permalink
BUT FOR ANY DECISION THE BENEFITS AND DRABACKS EXISTS. IF THE POSITIVES ARE HAVING GREATER WEIGHTAGE THAN THE DRAWBACKS THEN THE DECISION MUST BE IMPLEMENTED. AFTER THE nsg COUNTRIES ARE PRODUCING MAXIMUM ELECTRICT BY NECLUAR POWER REACTORS ONLY. NOTHING HAVE HAPPENED THERE TOO.
Any one knows full text of the Indo - US N-Deal. Everyone speaking about it, pro or against. Every media (including TV, Internet & Print) just hiding it from the public as the Government. If any one knows exact full text, Please publish it with great regards before criticizing it.
RE:Hi all,
by Govindan on Sep 05, 2007 03:55 PM Permalink
I am a nationalist and I have some very good articles reg the Nuclear Deal.Those who are interested may contact me on my email ID: knn_1981@yahoo.com
In past 30years, there was a tendency to make more nuclear bombs than fuel. Now the concept is changed. One bomb is enough to change the geography. You need to provide food, good education, health and shelter to your fellow citizens. US helped India earlier in the development and still an ally. Every year 100,000 Indian students come in US to study. This has enormously increased India s ability to channelize its brain stock towards technological and intellectual breakthroughs and also to increase its foreign reserves by several folds. My question to all of the hypocrites and US haters, why do these students do not go to study in Russia, China, Vietnam or even Pakistan? Russian and Chinese technologies are outdated and smuggled from US and could never meet the demands set by technological advancements. This N-deal will provide sufficient footage to India to stand on its own feet and also enable her to face her neighbors undauntedly. Look at the statements from China and Pakistan. They are feeling enormously insecure in response to our N-deal. Additionally China is utilizing its Indian communists to jeopardize the deal. Folks don%u2019t let that happen. It is your chance to show the solidarity as a country and to demean evil forces which always dragged you in the past.
The left should either support Government wholeheartedly or simply withdraw their support. They should not make opposition for sake of opposition. They should make their stand clear
I would prefer to change the caption as above as to what left means to today's India. India is no more a socialist country. Though this cannot be digested by many to me this is becoming more relevant. India Incorporation is shining not because of leftist principles but of rightist i.e Capitalistic principles. It is high time we understand and adopt this before it is too late. A party with 65 MP's is threatening to bring down a government and throw India into a stone age. We need to quickly think about the attitude and scrap this once and for all. For a brief moment let us think the benefits of left rule in West Bengal and Kerala. They are the most Industrially Backward centres in India. Is there anything they have done in the agriculture sector and again the we come back to a big zero. Their only job has been to oppose a government and passively support china moted policies. To their question of India becoming a satellite of America, it is rather better to be an americal satellite than a chinese. We should take a solemn oath that if the congress falls because of the left we should vote them back with a thumbing majority and put the left in their place.
I believe left parties are doing it for being in publicity. Since they do not have responsibility (at Center) they have opinion on everything. When they have responsibility look what happens, West Bengal remains in same state even after 30 years of their ruling. It is easier said than done.
