RE:New VP Supports Iranian Mullahs!
by Keerikkadan on Aug 10, 2007 10:05 PM Permalink
keep spreading hatte mukherjee. i think u are employed by isi to post in indian boards..
RE:New VP Supports Iranian Mullahs!
by mr on Aug 10, 2007 09:33 PM Permalink
What do you want to know about asking this question? I don't tell anything to you.
RE:Quiz: A country which is governed by three dolls?
by Sankaranarayanan Doraiswamy on Aug 10, 2007 10:19 PM Permalink
You left CUPA Soniaji the chairman of UPA and next may be CNDA
RE:Quiz: A country which is governed by three dolls?
by Mahesh G on Aug 10, 2007 09:53 PM Permalink
i don't have any hate over our PM . But understand my question that a doll is the one which doesn't have any self activation they are only controlled by some foreign agency.
RE:Quiz: A country which is governed by three dolls?
by dev singh on Aug 10, 2007 10:04 PM Permalink
Yes, PM is not a doll. He a puppet of this italian waitress an enuch and a fake sardar. Rajiv gandhi and education - this part i really agree. He set the precedence of corruption in PMO.
RE:Quiz: A country which is governed by three dolls?
by Indian on Aug 10, 2007 10:22 PM Permalink
We indians see Soniaji as daughter in law of our country. Her husband gave up his life for this country. She is more patriotic than any other indian girls who marry another one after thier husband death. She lived in India and living for India.
Also, she is elected to rule India by the people of India. She has all the rights to be a PM but she refused it becuase she is not after power. Only thing she wanted was a strong govt at the center and birght future for India.
RE:Quiz: A country which is governed by three dolls?
by Ankan Naik on Aug 11, 2007 01:01 AM Permalink
Education and Rajiv Gandhi...wot a joke!!...he never passed a single exam in Mechanical Engineering in Oxford University apart from the fact that he was a pilot...:)
RE:Quiz: A country which is governed by three dolls?
by mr on Aug 10, 2007 09:40 PM Permalink
change your name from indian to something else. i never talk you any good words for the country.
RE:When debate about TAJ Mahal, some told to vote Ankur.
by iluvtaj on Aug 10, 2007 09:38 PM Permalink
do read about things you post. It is ANGKOR WAT. And post some relevant things
with PUPPETS PM, President, and vice president. BE READY FOR ANYTHING. CONGRESS AND THESE LEFTIES CAN SELL ANYTIME. IS it true that our vicepresident refused to sing VANDE MATARAM NATIONAL SONG OF INDIA????????????????????????????????
RE:be ready to be slave again
by mr on Aug 10, 2007 09:03 PM Permalink
May not be true. These kind of internet links were the anti-nationals duty. Narayana Murthy also appologized, so, we shouldn't bring up religion. I am a hindu, muslim, christan, sikh. I need to tell you that.
RE:be ready to be slave again
by iluvtaj on Aug 10, 2007 09:07 PM Permalink
OH no it has nothing to do with religion, i have muslim friends. MY question is whether it is true or not?? and why anybody living in India cant sing NATIONAL SONG??
RE:be ready to be slave again
by gaurav Kapoor on Aug 10, 2007 09:14 PM Permalink
It is true 100 % True infact some of the left also supported it. See I am a Muslim but I dont mind singing National Song, as First I am an Indian, then a Muslim, But I go to temple too. My wife is a Hindu so that does not mean we should not sing National Song. I am proud to be an Indian, and even today I vote for Atal Bihari Vajpayee as my Leader. As I believe he is the true leader which India needs, and alongwith him APJ Abdul Kalam, the Peoples President.
Dear Secular ! Do not compare Narayana Murthy to thugs ! Narayana Murthy said it in a different context, I've met his wife, they are doing amazing personal service to the poor in remote tribal villages, and thats leaving apart IT.
Hamid is a radical, can you name one service he has done before arguing further?
RE:be ready to be slave again
by iluvtaj on Aug 10, 2007 09:40 PM Permalink
very well said Pritish. In fact we have a big problem of these "secular" people, becuase they argue without knowing facts.
RE:AFZAL
by ibbu on Aug 10, 2007 09:06 PM Permalink
yes these shd not be released and Sanjay Dutt must also termed as Life Imprisonmnt.6 yr sentence is a bit low punishmnt as far as i am concernd, He did a desh dhrow act being a HINDU.
RE:AFZAL
by mr on Aug 10, 2007 09:04 PM Permalink
If some one allow a single post in Rediff w/o bad comments, then I won't enter here. All of them were comes with comments suitable for the situation to create hatred.
I understand you dude, but situation is already created where there is consipracy. Look at Rediff articles like one on Yakub Memon, Afzal, look at PM singing tones when Kafeels mom cried. Did he ever gave any comment for the victims of Mumbai train blast? Are we babies to not understand this political game?
RE:AFZAL
by George on Aug 10, 2007 08:57 PM Permalink
Yes, an horourable discharge with clean character certificate signed by Mulla Mohan Singh & Maulana Karat.
Looks like the current congress/commie govt is determined to convert india into a islamic state. very soon sharia law also would be implemented by miyan Chand Mohan Singh. All political posts from Delhi to gulli would filled by muslims. Looks like Jina's greater pakistan dreams would be fulfilled by congress/commies.
RE:Congress turning India into islamic revolution
by mr on Aug 10, 2007 08:52 PM Permalink
Revolute if you feel pressed. Good governance is not to be seen from inside, to be seen from outside.
RE:Congress turning India into islamic revolution
by Pritish Nagaraj on Aug 10, 2007 08:58 PM Permalink
Very rightly said ! But We Indians are a gullible lot ! Thats why we have had so many invasions in the past and there is a new invasion of a kind - Paid Conversion / Islamic Terrorism !
RE:Congress turning India into islamic revolution
by mr on Aug 10, 2007 09:00 PM Permalink
There are lot of policy we need to adopt to tackle anything. We are secular country. I feel proud that Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Sigh etc. living side by side.
RE:Congress turning India into islamic revolution
by iluvtaj on Aug 10, 2007 09:11 PM Permalink
when we talk of giving favour to any religion EXCEPT HINDUISM we are secular. If we give privilidge to ANY OTHER religion we are secular BUT when we ask for equality, or talk of HInduism, or ask for REAL HISTORY OF INDIA, we become extremist, we are COMMUNAL WHY??
