RE:RE:Ujwal Nikam is Talking Nonsense ... About Taking Action Against General Public for Contempt.
by Drive A McLaren on Aug 06, 2007 11:12 PM Permalink
He is a Terrorist? I didnt know that. What makes him one, can you pls give some details?
RE:Ujwal Nikam is Talking Nonsense ... About Taking Action Against General Public for Contempt.
by Drive A McLaren on Aug 06, 2007 11:09 PM Permalink
A friend of mine studies at Columbia Univ, NY. She was visiting family in Bombay. She was witness to an accident and stopped to help the injured motorcycle driver. To her horror the Police lands up at her home seeking her arrest for causing the accident. She had to return back to NY in 48 hrs and ended up paying 5,000 as a bribe to be let off.
Mumbai Police is a total disgrace to society. Their actions are not exaggerated in movies, its a harsh reality. I congratulate you on having the courage to stand up to them. It takes more than just plain courage.
first tell me what action has been taken against LALU for violating law by getting his helicopter on NATIONAL HIGHWAY.if NO then pls do not talk of law as there is no comparison between SANJA and LALU's law.Sanjay has been a reformed indian as reqd by law by putting anybody behind bars.he was reformed is reformed and would remain reformed.his in laws do not kidnap withold trains attempt to murder or extort money WHEREAS LALU HISELF WIFE INLAWS still facing criminal charges.REG govt lawyer HE HIMSELF MUST BE PUNISHED FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT BY HIS REGULASR APPEARANCE AND STATEMENTS in MEDIA since as per SC directives issued yrs ago none of lawyers or anybody else related to process of justice can make public statements on inside court discussions--SO HANG UJJAWAL NIKAM--be sure i never saw personally either Sanjay or Nikam--Judiciary is full of jokers and hence no more jokes pls---lalit kumar
RE:why more jokes on JOKER like JUDICIARY
by twinkle on Aug 07, 2007 01:39 PM Permalink
u r ryt rachita. i totally agree with u. Judiciary is full of ""JOKERS""
RE:why more jokes on JOKER like JUDICIARY
by rachita bholowalia on Aug 07, 2007 10:53 AM Permalink
i did not say so but why a selective metod for public and no metod for LALU like persons who r never REFORMED and have been violating laws frequently despite holding ministrial posts.it is lalu's responsibility to make himself his wife inlaws supporters totally discplined.PLS LOOK INTO JAIL MANUAL__IT CLEARLY SAYS THAT JAIL IS TO REFORM THE CONVICT whereas SANJAY is already a reformed fellow citizen at least when compared to these dirtiest politicians.if law is for general public including Sanjay then it equally holds good for all these ruffians-LALIT
