RE:Lingam & Yoni
by bahmophet on Aug 05, 2007 02:04 PM Permalink
even shintoism has ying and yang! so stop bragging abt something u know little about. better stick to ur narrow mindedness. save us from ur half baked knowledge. mr. rahul got it?
RE:Lingam & Yoni
by Bon Jovi on Aug 05, 2007 02:04 PM Permalink
kaaba or Taj Mahal??? aik baat karo!abb shiva i never heard kabhi Meeca gaya ho! itni lambi na choro!!!! Taj or red fort plus qutb minar is ok!zayada isnt gud LOL
RE:RE:RE:Muslims speak up against terror
by Silent Sea on Aug 05, 2007 02:02 PM Permalink
@hindu Indian, Hey dude, please do not use filth. An never bring our mothers and sisters in the filth. You can be of any religion. This is my sincere request.Peace.
RE:Muslims speak up against terror
by Silent Sea on Aug 05, 2007 02:00 PM Permalink
For the first time I can see that Mr. Sassy's message makes sense. So I will reply. I strongly condenm all forms of terrorism against humanity. Population control is something which needs to be addressed through better education and proper advertisement thru the Muslim comunity. UCC can be made possible after a healthy debate between the educted and rational minded peopple of all communites. Anything more Mr. Sassy?
RE:Muslims speak up against terror
by Silent Sea on Aug 05, 2007 02:12 PM Permalink
I am no expert hence cannot make a judgement on UCC. It has to be discussed with learned people of all communities who understand and handle sensititive issues as well. Messages with filth are the ones which I cannot answer on. The message that you put up here was proper and I coul answer you on that. peace.
RE:Pornography in Ramayana
by nikhil samant on Aug 05, 2007 02:06 PM Permalink
Present day islam is not true islam,because the very basis of islam is koran & present day of koran is only one of the several versions available at the time of Abu Bakr & his goons chose the present version assuming the the role of mohammed to perpetuate the mythical version of koran.Abu Bakr was caliph from 632-634. There are several incompatible traditions describing a collation during his reign.
1. 'Umar was worried that bits of the Koran would be lost after many Muslims were killed at the Battle of Yamama. Therefore he commissioned Zaid ibn Thabit to collect the Koran and write it down? 2. Or was it Abu Bakr's idea? Or maybe 'Ali's? 3. There are several other difficulties: Could this have been accomplished in only two years? The Muslims were fighting the Battle of Yamama (in Central Asia), why had these new converts memorised the Koran but the Arab converts had not? Why was this collation not an official codex but rather the private property of Hafsa?
It sounds like these traditions were invented to credit the popular Abu Bakr and (more significantly) to debit the much maligned 'Uthman.
The Collection of the Koran (pp. 12-13)
'Uthman was caliph from 644-656. He was asked for an official codex by one of his generals because the troops were fighting over which reading of the Koran was correct. Zaid was once again commissioned, with the help of three others. But%u2026
1. The Arabic of the Koran was not a dialect. 2. There are variations between the numbe
ATATURK, father of modern turkey in his book , 'viewed Islam as a major factor holding back Turkey's progress'.he sought to banish islam as a political and social force from the public sphere, though of course the vast majority of the population remained muslims by religion.fot ataturk , westernisation and modernisation went hand in hand . And,indeed turkey achieved great sucess -arguably more than anyother muslim -majority state in the world- in building democracy, maintaining stability and moving forward economically.for rough comparison a turk is 7 times richer than a pakistani
RE:RE:BE CAREFULL
by bahmophet on Aug 05, 2007 02:08 PM Permalink
what is taken from the earth is given back to it, u fool. u go and lick the DMKS ASS.
RE:BE CAREFULL
by Major Sassy on Aug 05, 2007 01:52 PM Permalink
So now you are up to your regular stunts; trying to supress free speech with fear when you cant argue with facts. Sorry wont work.
RE:BE CAREFULL
by bahmophet on Aug 05, 2007 02:06 PM Permalink
U ARE FRUSTRATED WHAT/ NO WOMAN IN UR LIFE? THEN GET A DOLL AND SCREW IT. AND GET THE ..... OUT OF HERE.
RE:BE CAREFULL
by Harish pandey on Aug 05, 2007 01:57 PM Permalink
They invoke the law when it suits them otherwise use blackmail and the bomb. Ha Ha Ha! Some cheek you believer.
New Delhi: As TADA court called curtains on the 1993 Mumbai blasts trial, questions have also been raised about justice, or the lack of it, in the 1992-1993 riots case. While the Srikrishna Commission - instituted to probe the causes of the communal riots that crippled Mumbai from December 1992 to January 1993 - submitted its report, it has not been implemented. The riot victims have largely been denied justice till date. Now, former attorney general Soli Sorabjee says that no implementation of the Srikrishna Commission's recommendations was scandalous. In an exclusive interview to CNN-IBN%u2019s Karan Thapar on Devil%u2019s Advocate, Sorabjee said it was simply political clout which saved many of the 1992 Mumbai riots accused. IT IS HIGH TIME WE MUST CONSTRICT THESE MISCHIEVOUS AND KILL THIS ISSUE.
