RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by Major Sassy on Aug 03, 2007 02:41 PM Permalink
It would help in your cause if you could write a little better than a monkey with a type writer.
RE:RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 02:54 PM Permalink
that is safer than a monkey with a gun.
RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by Vivek Sharma on Aug 03, 2007 03:09 PM Permalink
its the lack of discipline in every aspect of life...thats why I guess....
RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 02:37 PM Permalink
we were a prosperous country,the british looted it.but if not for the british,we would not be one country today,though religion binds the country.hinduism is the common thing,as is also islam.
RE:RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by Major Sassy on Aug 03, 2007 02:43 PM Permalink
as is also Shikhism and Jainism and Buddhism and Parsis and Xianity and ..... they are all common things and all bind.
Good Lahori logic.
BTW I have nothing against any religion but stop making foolish statements.
RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 02:53 PM Permalink
yes,they are all common,i just mentioned the 2 most numeric. what is the point u r disputing,that we were rich and prosperous?
RE:RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by JGN on Aug 03, 2007 03:14 PM Permalink
Mr. dinesh kumar, we are/were neither rich nor prosperous, but you are unfortunate enough to have taken birth in this country!!!!!!!!!!!!! You cannot erase that. Now stop blaming every one else!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:34 PM Permalink
mr jgn,we were rich.we had the most stable societies.the west is selling our own medicines to us.and they are coming to spirituality after seeing the worst of materialism.
RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by on Aug 03, 2007 03:16 PM Permalink
what a monu'mental' statement!!!...jainisn?...bhuddism???...they a fraction of the population of the country.......the ppl of india alomst laugh at them if they lucky to spot one that is.......as for sikhism......the "most common thing" of this religion is skewed toward Islam and NOT toward hindusim....ur a fool to believe it which from ur comments have made it preety plane......this "Major Sassy" is a paid propagander of the VHP/RSS/Bajaranj dal/Siva sena.....try findinf any of his comments on "india's economy" or "indian comp a factor now in the world economy".....
No my friends...this guy earns his income and pays his rent thru mud slingling of the worst kind......dude we all smpthasize....u got to pay ur rent and utilities..........so go on exponding ur "pathbreaking" theses of matters where Islam/Muslim in any way figure.......
If ur salary is below the market level...dont contact consumer forums....u'll be out in the 'light'
RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by Madurai SatheeshKumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:32 PM Permalink
Dear On, Just a correction.
Jainism and buddhism were numerically larger centuries before, got eroded in the course of time. So if you are talking about past say, 1000 years back, yes, there were also in good numbers... And, india was indeed a good,civilized and prosperous during the times of Yuan Tsang, the chinese traveler who visited some 1500 years back, if i am correct. In his travelogue, he had mentioned that people were happy,contented, and no beggers were around...
RE:WHY INDIS IS STILL DEVELOPING DESPITE SHE GOT EVERYTHING
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:39 PM Permalink
the west took disease wherever they went,south america and india. they consistently looted us,every official of the east india company made a fortune.
DONT BE A FOOL - HE EXPECTED VIRGINS IN A PARDISE. O MUSLIM WHEN U WORSHIP A ALMIGHTY GOD U NO NEED TO FIGHT FOR HIM . HE WILL TAKE CARE OF EVERY THING .
JIHAD IS TO FIGHT WITH OURSELVES TO BE HOLY NOT TO KILL OTHERS.
THIS IS SOME OF MISINTERREPTED TEACHING OF PRHOHET.
why dont u answer whether there were bomb blasts before 1992(babri masjid) which received a new life after 2002(gujarat). the indian army is fighting terrorism heroically and clinically. what we dont need is misguided hindu kafeels who spread their hatred. nobody can stop a terrorist,but u guys act so jingoistic.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by Major Sassy on Aug 03, 2007 02:19 PM Permalink
Oh dont be such a Dhimmi. Yes there was communal trouble including bomb blasts before the incidents as well. After 1992 people realized that riots are a sure way to get killed so they developed more cowardly means.
RE:RE:SK s skewed logic.
by J Singh on Aug 03, 2007 02:40 PM Permalink
Major Sisssy, dinesh kumar is absolutely right. You are there on every chat, every day, spreading your BJP brand of hatred. What you do not realise is that the sangh parivar and people like you are the best friends of islamic terrorists. Both of you need each other to survive. If you do not spread hatred against Muslims, the terrorists will not have a justification for their deeds. Similarly, the hatred you have generated results in the Hindus of Gujarat supporting Hindu terrorists like Modi. And Modi justifies his actions by blaming Muslim terrorists. It is a cycle of hatred and violence that will, eventually, destroy this beautiful country. This is what you are. This is your truth.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:00 PM Permalink
uve got to the heart of the matter,but these guys pretend they are being brave by shouting like this.sissy even says he is fighting so that i can live in peace. our army is fighting a enemy and it is doing great but we have such misguided fanatics inside.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by J Singh on Aug 03, 2007 03:13 PM Permalink
You know, Dinesh, Major Sissy is not really in the Army. He has just assumed the name to make himself feel good. People like him can never have the courage to fight for the nation like our boys at the Borders. The Indian Army has men and women of integrity and courage. They do not have the time to write his brand of filth on the net.
RE:RE:SK s skewed logic.
by Major Sassy on Aug 03, 2007 03:15 PM Permalink
Can you enlightened gentleman tell me how do you come to such great inferences?
RE:RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:28 PM Permalink
hi j singh,it never occurred to me that he might be from the army,but he mentioned about superior officers.that was a bad moment to imagine that this friend of ours could be from anywhere but the loony force.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by meindian on Aug 03, 2007 02:29 PM Permalink
I THINK MAJOR SASSY IN A NEED OF MAKING A COMMUNAL RIOT IN INDIA,,,HOW MUCH U GOT FROM PAKISTAN ...THEY HAVE NO MATTER HINDU OR MUSLIMS OR PAKISTAN ,THEY TERRORISE THE HINDUS WITH MONEY AND MUSLIMS WITH THE RELOGION.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by Major Sassy on Aug 03, 2007 02:39 PM Permalink
Can you read? Please google for such information; if you want I can post links however I dont want to get into a old argument.
In any case these are silly excuses; what was the problem that Kafeel had; Mohamed Atta? The Kashmir terror was older than Rath Yatra; so dont be under false pretences.. OK.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 02:45 PM Permalink
u r either ignorant or are below the age of 20. various reasons give rise to conflicts.people need a group when there is trouble.whichever identity rallies the most people is used. bhindranwale tried the sikh identity.ulfa is using assamese identity.they are all bound to fail because the foundation for our country has been laid and it is strong and divine. but occasional curses like advani come along.he was not honest or decent enough to fight and win elections on issues of importance.he uses hinduism as the rallying point to attain power. if there was some real injustice ,he would have spelt it out.uniting the hindus is not a bad thing.but if it is done for a destructive purpose,there is no use. because there were no real issues,he went 400 years back to babur.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by Major Sassy on Aug 03, 2007 03:13 PM Permalink
Dear what Advani did or did not do right has no bearing on 1) long history of Muslim terrorism everywhere in the world. 2) What we are discussing here.
So instead of going off on a tangent like a Islamist Jehadi stick to the topic and stop bringing sun moon and planets to every discussion
And dont indulge in personal attack when faced with facts Chamka? I am probably older than you and studied more than you and know more than what you will ever know in your life.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by Madurai SatheeshKumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:42 PM Permalink
Hi Dinesh kumar, Even before rath yatra in 1992, there were lot of islamic activities going on,atleast in south india. In fact, VHP and RSS did not exist in south decades back. And, they came up as a result of these fanatical meetings/operations by islamic groups. And, secondly, hindus were killed/evacuated from kashmir for quite some time much before 1992. DOnt know why not many people take note of that. If muslims can react for demolishing an old structure(though its wrong), then how come we keep on expecting some hindus to show restrain? I mean the reaction is a happening due to these occurences. Basically even political leadership did not take them seriously, as they take nowadays even about Dr.Haneef.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:24 PM Permalink
who got personal,sissy.(nice description). are u dumb. or dumber or dumbest. do u or dont u know about the creation of israel,the overthrow of the shah,the massacre in lebanon in 1982,the supply of arms to saddam,the crimes in vietnam,the overthrow of allende in chile,and even today trying to kill castro and hugo chavez. it seems u r learning.slowly.
RE:RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 04:01 PM Permalink
hi madurai,kashmir is a political problem,the pandits are not there today.there are other things also which u dont notice.one temple in kashmir which was abandoned has been maintained by a muslim there who does puja daily.the politics is the main thing there.it is bcos of nehru that kashmir is with us.the ruler hari singh was undecided till the last moment,only when pakistan invaded did he sign to join india. then sheikh abdullah was arrested and finally,the elections were supposedly rigged in 1987 to favour farook abdullah to keep other characters out.that has resulted in all these years of violence. whe did coimbatore take place,before 1992 or after. was there any riot in the south before 1992.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by abhi on Aug 03, 2007 03:27 PM Permalink
hey blind dinesh idiot --- dont u see kasmiri pandit situation is well plant teorrist . started before--1990---
RE:RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:30 PM Permalink
the trouble in kashmir started in 1989.it is similar to what the ulfa is doing now in assam. it will be defeated and the pandits will go back to their properties and homes.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by abhi on Aug 03, 2007 03:33 PM Permalink
do you think pandits will be able to go back in there home .. i dont think so many were homelsess they need money to survice in big city most of them has no option other than selling there home for few penny .rest who have not sold is being occupied by kasmiri muslims
RE:RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:41 PM Permalink
they will go back,friend. when the troubles are over. there is a problem in that state and matters were not helped by our minister accompanying terrorists to their homes.
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dumdum on Aug 03, 2007 03:35 PM Permalink
hey u pseudosecularist,islamist terrorist hide behind ur backs and backstabb our country.dont be fooled by secular thinkings.this is the only country where majority is thrashed by everybody
RE:RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 03:42 PM Permalink
dumbdumb,ur idiocy is total. u please tell me where the majority is thrashed by everybody.ur inferiority is a shame.
RE:RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dumdum on Aug 04, 2007 04:27 PM Permalink
see muslims and hindus have different laws in our country.and its fashionable to criticize hindus.i know hinduism is not a perfect religion,there is lot of scope for improvement but why so much backlash against our own culture? so why they are not hanging afzal guru? why govt doesnt send back bangla muslims into their den?
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by abhi on Aug 03, 2007 05:02 PM Permalink
suoport to teorrist for not hanging envolve in parliament attack is very good example of internal teorrist .
RE:SK s skewed logic.
by dumdum on Aug 03, 2007 03:58 PM Permalink
minority appeasement is order of day u commie.whenever time comes to punish persons from certain religion our secular govt ducks.whenever atrocities are commited on majority hindus they are suppressed. this is mentality and working of communists.they will profess hate against ruling classes,invite their bangla muslim friends for votes from bangladesh,support china in 1962 war.list is endless.
MY DEAR INDIAN BROTHERS AND SISTERS WHY IS IT SO DESPITE SHE HAS THE FIRST UNIVERSITY IN THE WORLD(THAKSHASHILA)THE WORLDS GREATEST AND THE SUCCESSFUL CULTURE,90%OF PEOPLES IN NASA ARE INDIANS ,INDIA HAD THE GREATEST MEN IN THE WORLD HISTORY ..WE HAVE TO THINK WHY --BECAUSE INDIANS DOESNT HAVE UNITY..ALLWAYS COMMUNAL RIOTS ...IT IS IGNITED FROM THE BABRI MASJID AND THE PAKISTAN MAKE USE OF THAT TO DESTROY US.ARE WE GONNA BE LIKE THIS ALWAYS..HINDUISM OR ISLAMISM WHO EVER THE EXTRIMIST IS SHOULD BE CONDEMNED ,MODI HINDU TERRORIST ,OSAMA S FOLLOWERS IN INDIA -ISLAMIC TERRORIST(WHAT THEY SAYING IS NOT HINDUISM OR ISLAMISM )ALL THIAHAPPENS COZ OF LESS RELGIOUS KNOWLEDGE .RELIGION WENT INTO POLITICAL PARTIES HENCE THE DESTRUCTION OF THE COUNTRY
India must support Pakistan and Musaraf in their fight against terrorists...if we ignore it now, that might come to india once it destroys pakistan like Afganistan and Iraq. It is an oppurtunity for uniting india and pakistan...
RE:SUPPORT PAKISTAN
by abhi on Aug 03, 2007 04:01 PM Permalink
india always ready to figth with teorrist ...it is paki who are teorrist and support it .we need hard rules like TADA and POTA back again... we shd clean our contry teorrist before blaming pakistan
RE:Valid reasons
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 02:05 PM Permalink
turkey,azerbaijan.it is in the middle east that there r massive problems because of major evil committed by the us and allies.remember that 6 lakh civilians have been killed.
RE:Valid reasons
by meindian on Aug 03, 2007 02:14 PM Permalink
40% OF WORLD COUNTRIES ARE MUSLIM STATES ANDUT OF TAT ONLY 5%HAVE PROBLRMS.THE MOST DANGEROUS STATE IN THE WORLD IS INDIA AS IT GOT COMMUNAL PROBLRMS WHICH IS 100 TIMES MORE EFFECTIVE THAN AN ATOM BOMB
RE:Valid reasons
by dinesh kumar on Aug 03, 2007 02:20 PM Permalink
a few misguided people online does not make it a big problem.the people have lived alongside for centuries together. there is injustice in the middleeast but it does not have to do anything with india.if any indian wants to battle the west,the best thing would be to renounce indian citizenship. and some muslim leader somewhere has to speak out that killing civilians is cowardice.
RE:Valid reasons
by Ann Pan on Aug 03, 2007 03:23 PM Permalink
Please get your statistics right. There are 28% muslim states (Total countries 194 and muslim countries 55).
RE:RE:Valid reasons
by Major Sassy on Aug 03, 2007 02:15 PM Permalink
Huh; turkey is in a split personality mode; with the secular army fighting the Islamist politicians there have been many crack downs many are expected. Turkey is suffering because the people want it to be a Islamic country where as the Army upholds the secular constitution.
Get your facts right. Who care for Azeri's anyway.
RE:RE:RE:Valid reasons
by J Singh on Aug 03, 2007 02:51 PM Permalink
You are wrong again, Major Sissy. The people of Turkey have fought for over a century, to retain their identity as a modern, secular state. And it is. Your research is incomplete. And there are many of us who do care about Azeris. One would have thought you would be happy to hear about a Muslim State that was preaching peace and harmony.
Just proves my earlier point about how you sangh parivar types are the best buddies of islamic terrorists.
