Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 172 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
New Gandhi Vs Old Gandhi
by Satyan Kamath on Apr 27, 2007 02:20 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Great man he was who is called as Mahatma, he was indeed a mahatma. Even when televison was not available he had the capacity to move the people of entire nation for one cause, we salute him, even in his death.

What these joker gandhi's of nowadays doing, they are not even equal to one step of Mahatma Gandhi's life and we all want to discuss about them and speculate about them.
Why r we not having the morality like before to selflessly serve the nation. Why is nobody asking these politicians to be accountablr for their actions.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:New Gandhi Vs Old Gandhi
by Bahl Kumar on Apr 27, 2007 02:21 PM  Permalink
live and let live

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:New Gandhi Vs Old Gandhi
by Kompella on Apr 27, 2007 02:27 PM  Permalink
All starts from people like Kamathappa. Looks educated but not aware of realities. Comment on any person at will without giving a chance to that person. Just becasue Styan has Kamath family name, can I comment on Satyan and comepare him with other Kamaths. Think over, friends.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:New Gandhi Vs Old Gandhi
by SK on Apr 27, 2007 02:41 PM  Permalink
Kompella dude,

'Kamathappa' just made some observations. EVERY sane and educated Indian these days wonders how come these guys go around with Gandhi surname. Truth is that they are no way related to the Mahatma whatsover. That said, it can be just a coincidence. But using it for undue political mileage, they have abused the surname. Where as the Mahatma did not ever aspire for any position of power, these modern Gandhis will do ANYTHING for power - be it holding the entire country in the shackles of emergency, playing caste and religion cards, divisive politics, whatever.

We want able leaders with a vision and capability to lead our country - History shows only able administrators have been able to take nations forward. Here they are trying to force Gandhi after Gandhi on us, when we all believe we are in a democracy

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:New Gandhi Vs Old Gandhi
by Divakar Hombalgatti on Apr 27, 2007 02:46 PM  Permalink
But the name is acquired for selfish deeds when actual surname is supposed to be Gandy. They have to be condemned.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:New Gandhi Vs Old Gandhi
by bhangra bole on Apr 27, 2007 02:27 PM  Permalink
Did u personally worked with Mahatma Gandhi???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:New Gandhi Vs Old Gandhi
by s on Apr 27, 2007 04:39 PM  Permalink
Feroz was feroz khan ... to avoid embaressment to Nehru with the help of mahatama & a simple affidavit in court he changed his surname ... the same can be verified through websites or even through google search ...


   Forward   |   Report abuse
Slur on Rahul Gandhi
by dibyendu dey on Apr 27, 2007 02:19 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Unparliamentary language used by none other than minister of Parliamentary affairs.One can recollect once Narendra Modi called Priyanka & Rahul as cross breed ! Matter of National shame.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Slur on Rahul Gandhi
by satya narayana on Apr 27, 2007 02:49 PM  Permalink
Hats off! you are correct.To say frankly, they are not at all GANDHIANS.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Slur on Rahul Gandhi
by Vinay Gupta on Apr 27, 2007 02:40 PM  Permalink
When Some one has no argument to offer then he start objecting about the language etc etc.

Is it something new from Azam? Once he called Bharat Mata as Dayan but no one including these Congressi made noise.

Is Rahul bigger than Bharat Mata



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Slur on Rahul Gandhi
by sujeesh areekara on Apr 27, 2007 02:38 PM  Permalink
fact is a fact..no matter who says it

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Slur on Rahul Gandhi
by Seshan Iyer on Apr 27, 2007 02:44 PM  Permalink
Dear Dibyenduji, first of all please understand that these three guys, Sonia, Priyanka and Rahul are right people at wrong place. One should think about the suitability of the candidature of people before selecting them for any position. How can you select a painter for the post of an Electrical Engineer. So, the Congress people should have thought well, before bringing this trio in politics. What they all have in common is the surname "Gandhi" just to misunderstand the poor public while voting.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:Slur on Rahul Gandhi
by Sasi Kumar on Apr 27, 2007 03:07 PM  Permalink
They got the surname from Feroz Gandhi, who is no way connected to Mahatma.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Slur on Rahul Gandhi
by s on Apr 27, 2007 04:19 PM  Permalink
Feroz was feroz khan ... to avoid embaressment to Nehru with the help of mahatama & a simple affidavit in court he changed his surname ... the same can be verified through websites or even through google search ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator. | Hide replies
RE:Abusing Rahul Gandhi
by Babu Bharathan on Apr 27, 2007 02:32 PM  Permalink
then y ur Mom run away with a muslim neighbour???

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Modi now Khan
by South Indian on Apr 27, 2007 02:17 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

modi did it last time... this 3rd rate language.. he paid for it..

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message deleted by moderator
RE:Modi now Khan
by bajrangi on Apr 27, 2007 03:23 PM  Permalink
Yah ! he got paid and is CM now. So it's the Aazam Khan's term to get CM post.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Lets not insult pig
by hari krishna on Apr 27, 2007 02:14 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Let us no insult pig and drag it from the pool of dirt amd mud into dirty politics.
Dirty drains and mud and pool are far better secured and sacred than indian politics and politicinas


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:Lets not insult pig
by SK on Apr 27, 2007 02:24 PM  Permalink
I agree with you.

All I have to say here is 'God save our land from these lowly and unworthy goondas who go by the collective term 'politicians'

   Forward   |   Report abuse
What needs to be condemned should be condemned
by on Apr 27, 2007 02:03 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The matter is not whether what Rahul Gandhi has been doing during the election campaign across UP as right or wrong. The point is that even after 60 years of independence we are still in days of mud-slinging politics. I just wish that our politicians grow up.. .mind it, I am not refereing to growing of their biological age but their mental age!!!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:What needs to be condemned should be condemned
by Ashok Gupta on Apr 27, 2007 02:13 PM  Permalink
agree but only those who have a brain can grow mentally. Unless a larger percentage of people come to vote this state of affairs will continue. We must take responsibility and vote in the right candidate.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:What needs to be condemned should be condemned
by Bhuwan Joshi on Apr 27, 2007 02:33 PM  Permalink
Well Mr Gupta,

Who is the right candidate? Hamam mein sab nange hein.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
It is a party without ethics.
by s m f on Apr 27, 2007 02:01 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Please inform that Samajwadi fellow that his days as a politician are over. His own party might sack him. You cannot have poliicians talking like this. It only reflects on the party. and imagine we have a family who i will not name (but everybody knows) are swearing by people like Yadav and amar singhs.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:It is a party without ethics.
by s on Apr 27, 2007 04:20 PM  Permalink
dear s m f ... politics is full of the corrupt & criminal class .. be they of any party ... so I do not think his political career will be over ...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Total 172 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message