ISRO PLEASE SEND SONIA MAINO TO ITLAY IN YOUR ROCKET also take her servants Arjun Sing and Man? MohanSing::))
NO one is giving value to Rahul and Priyanka, there is no poeple to see them... REDIFF WHY ARE YOU PURPOSEFULLY GIVING THEM IMPORTANCE????? WE DOUBT YOUR INTENTIONS
y not sons and daughters of salman kurshid, or nd tiwari come into the limelight??because tehre shldnt be a generation gap in teh dynasty rule..hope by the time rahuls and priyankas kids grows up and take a plunge into politi, the present day kids teach them a lesson
I think that Priyanka is the another young leader we will see in the coming days. She is part of young MPs we have from all over the parties. We should support the young and honest and hard working new politiciance. Only time can prove that who is good or bad so give a fare chance to every one. One thing I can say is that she is far better than curpt old politiciance. I will also say that she is also not spready any hate in the communities and only talking about development so that is also a positive point. I can say that she is much beeter then the cast based and religion based politicians. She is in UP for supporting congress and I will say that this is upt UP people that how they want there future. Thanks
RE:We should fare enough to critisize Priyanka
by Ram Sharma on Apr 24, 2007 03:05 PM Permalink
she is also trying to carry forward the dynastic rule and nothing else. just by being daughter of the nehru dynastic family, young and talking about development does not make a leader.
RE:We should fare enough to critisize Priyanka
by raj khator on Apr 24, 2007 03:14 PM Permalink
then who is the leader in India. Do you have any name ?. who you think is the leader and where he is ? In which party and what is his/her thought about the development .She is talking about development atleast not spreading hate and violence in sociaty. Atleast she is not publishing CDs to make a difference in the communities.
RE:We should fare enough to critisize Priyanka
by Bengal Tiger on Apr 24, 2007 03:30 PM Permalink
She is talking about development of her swiss bank account.:) Obviously, she is more sly, of the two siblings, she is waiting for her comical brother to make a fool of himself and then after some time she will again project herself as the heir apparent. Just wait and watch the fun of clan politics.
RE:We should fare enough to critisize Priyanka
by overblown on Apr 24, 2007 06:20 PM Permalink
raj khotar has lost his brains. First of all she is not an MP. She is making her base to enter politics when her kids are little older. And then the kids will follow and then their kids and then their kids just because her great great great grandmother and grandfather were nehru and indira gandhi. i dont know why cant people see that. I am sure by next general elections they would start projecting rahul gandhi as future pm. people please read the article about sonia gandhi named do we know our sonia on this website called hindurashtra.org. the aricle is by dr subramanium swamy.
Everyone works for their own benefit, U beter do for urs. Families wont hold the sway in India, if only we people rise in our own inerest. Untill then, I will have to prod alone to defeat this family. Narsimha Rao and Vajpayee were the two best PMs for India. ( Am being A-partisan here).I never liked Rajiv even after he was killed. Indira had a sharp mind, liked her too, but she used it somewhat in the wrong direction.Nehru gave a good direction to the country based on his times, but as times changed, policies shud hav changed- Indira failed there. And the rest of the family has been crap. Better change them. Its a pity to see Sonia in a position of apparent power right now.I dont deserve it, and will make appropriate amends. Hope u guys too will.
RE:family issues
by RDC on Apr 24, 2007 01:51 PM Permalink
Dear Mr. Ashok: Best of luck for your campaign in defeating the gandhis. And may you prod alone all your life. Families won't hold sway if, along with the gandhis, you manage to pull down the thackerays, the chautalas, the pawars, abd everyone else in Indian politics today. It seems fashionable for you ignorants to castigate the congress or sonia gandhi or anyone else who doens not fall into your circle of approval. get a life! The alternatives to the congress has human-trafficking MPs, Mandir-masjid non-issues, friends like Amar Singh, and marxist policies that take back the country a few hundred years. And yes, pickle-makers laundered money, a failed border war with smamed coffins, bribe on camera, etc. are the two best PM's you talked about. Probably try out Pakistan. They need social workers like you to prod alone.
RE:family issues
by Mahesh Jagga on Apr 24, 2007 03:19 PM Permalink
RDC, for every mandir masjid issue, there is a 60 year old tradition of communal behaviour by congress. For every human trafficking MP, there are scores of wife killers (by burning in a tandoor) in Congress, for every one Amar Singh (I am no fan but you named him so you have to be replied - I am defending the indefensible) there are and were umpteen Jagdish Sharmas and their ilk in Congress. You found one failed border. Listen dude. We lost POK in 1947, Aksai Chin in 1962, A strategic advantage in 1971 / 1972. All three wars we lost. Only two were draws - 1965 and Kargil.
Bribe on camera? Bangaru Laxman is at least not in reckoning. Ajit Jogi who sent lacs to buy MLAs is still leader of Congress in Chhatisgarh. I am sure it was a reward for failed but well tried mission!
It is neither fashionable to criticize anyone nor it is a matter of approval. We need a good party to govern the nation. The party cannot improve unless there is democracy within.
Let congress find its own leaders within themselves. They have to get a spine to stand on their own and fight. If they depend upon a family which depends upon a borrowed surname and some sweet children, it is liable to be equated with beggers on the street who try to evoke public sympathy by using children's innocence to get bigger dole.
RE:family issues
by overblown on Apr 24, 2007 06:37 PM Permalink
hey rdc, these mps may have been caught human trafficking but unlike the congress guys they are not selling there motherland. Atleast they are not buttlicking a phirangi. What is arjun singh trying to do to the country? Mahesh spoke abt ppl like ajit jogi who should be shot up their butt. Madir masjid isssue was bought by the congress. The congress is trying to divide the country in the name of religion and caste all over again. Rdc get some brains. Look at kashmir, if the congress stays for one more term then kashmir is gone for good. Its during this government that you can openly speak against your own country like it happened in kashmir. Rdc sounds also like one of those. Also siva is in the same category. mahesh has given you a awesome reply.
RE:family issues
by Ram Sharma on Apr 24, 2007 02:54 PM Permalink
shashtriji was probably the best PM. people all over the country used to listen to him. no other PM commanded that much respect. he never misutilised his official position to promote his relatives as has been done by the nehru and his daughter onwards. he also did not allow his official car to be used by his son.
RE:family issues
by raj khator on Apr 24, 2007 03:09 PM Permalink
Which party is not following dynasty 1. Indian national loldal-chotala family 2. NCP- sharad pawar family business 3. BJP-most of the leaders are taking there children in politics-Jswant singh-Manverder singh, Vasundara raje - Vijayaraje 4. Siv Sena- Bal thakray-Udhav Thakray(Family drama) 5. SP- Mulayam and family 6. DMK- karunanidhi's property 7. RJD- Lalu yadav and in- Laws many more so why only Gandhis are there to critise. Is there any answer.Thanks
RE:family issues
by raj khator on Apr 24, 2007 03:20 PM Permalink
Truth is always bitter. After looking a long list in my reply you lost your behaviour. what is your openion about the list, have to say anything :)
RE:RE:family issues
by rajendra kumar on Apr 24, 2007 03:59 PM Permalink
You should do research and should correct your data. Congress won election in 2004(VAjpayee Ji was in trouma and few more RSS brigade). Why Congress won election this should be understood and if you will not take that as a lesson I think that you can only dream about to come in power ever. BJP and NDA was shouting Indian rising because there managers were calculating a win in seating AC rooms in Delhi. Indian is not Delhi and few metro cities , India is in Villages . Where the farmers and other people are leaving, still 75% of indian is leaving in Villages. So when BJP was talking about singing India and farmers was doing suiside then the elections came and people taught NDA a leasson. I don't think that they have learnt a lesson from the defeat.Congress won the election but Sonia decliened the PM's post for national intigrity( although there was nothing like this few people was shouting for foreign origin of the Sonia Ji-Nothing more then that. These people should know that our Indian brothers also leaving on dofferent part of world and have a stake there in that part of world and we have proud on them- if you think that we can go and leave anywhere then why you are crying on Sonia Ji- Don't forget she is Bahu of our country and married to the Rajiv Gandhi and citizen of India from last 40 years). My main point is that even if the congress won the election Sonia Ji Declined the PM's post , this is the highest secrafice any one can do.Today in Sonia Ji's leadershio the congress govt is lead by Manmohan Singh a very honest and forsighted PM. I think that dynasty alligation against is not acceptable. Rahul and Priyanka have every right to come in politics and spread Harmony in the Indian politics and keep the morals of politics high.
RE:family issues
by Mahesh Jagga on Apr 24, 2007 05:39 PM Permalink
Dear Rajendra Kumar,
a) your response is not relevent to the discussion here. The discussion was on who is spreading dynastic rule and not on who won the last election. You also presumed that I am from BJP / NDA / RSS etc. which is a typical congress response. What I say should be evaluated on logic and not based on the source. The logical message any way does not get corrupted even if the source is corrupted.
b) Now to your issues. Today congress is talking about India Rising and farmers are still committing suicide (may be more than what it was four years back)
c) This government's honesty is carried forward by Buta Singhs, Sibte Razi etc. They are the shining examples.
d) The sacrifice drama is well known now. Kindly do not pontificate on same. It is public knowledge that the President had noticed some illegalities and hence advised SG not to put forward her claim.
e) Any way a puppet PM is always better.
f) Rahul has been spreading harmony by shamelessly wooing Muslims.
g) Sonia carried this forward by writing letter to Muslim leaders separately in Urdu. Has she ever addressed the common man?
h) PM clearly stated that Muslims will have the first right on national resources. How shame less can one get?
i) Your response to me on citizenship is irrelevent as I did not raise the issue. you started that. Chor ki dadi mein tinka????
j) Remove Gandhi name, remove what their forefathers have done (negative and positive) and talk about qualities, vision, communication.
RE:[object MouseEvent]
by Bengal Tiger on Apr 24, 2007 04:08 PM Permalink
Sonia's Italian PA its because of Sycophants like you India has remained a third world country since Independence. It's a shame that people like you run behind foreigner even after gaining independence in 1947. It seems the slave mentality has not gone. Don't worry this entire clan will flop very soon.
RE:family issues
by Akash mrr on Apr 24, 2007 06:24 PM Permalink
Reply to Bengal tigerIf Bjp was there instead of congress (during 1947's) We could have see india like in old ways with 600 small states consisting of by caste ,creed, religion even now we can see the people behaviour cahnged dramatically saying and talking in the name of eligion so iam thankful to god that at the time of independence this so called sangh parivar was so weak in numbers. Also you have to think that india cant survive alone without cooperating other countries.
RE:family issues
by rajendra kumar on Apr 24, 2007 04:22 PM Permalink
I am a Villager and represent real India if time come we will stand to save the humanity at any cost. Worry about you ? becasue a few days left for the people like you .
RE:RE:family issues
by Bengal Tiger on Apr 24, 2007 03:25 PM Permalink
Truth is not bitter, but you are bitter, you are obviously veering away from the topic, the topic here is of this pirated gandhi family not about some other weird research done by you. :)
What you are doing here is to hijack the topic itself, now that is not smart. Anyway, for all their efforts what will the congress get in UP? Nothing, as usual Amethi will be booked in advance, the rest is just a sad story.:)
RE:family issues
by rajendra kumar on Apr 24, 2007 03:35 PM Permalink
Congress will get around 60-75 seats in UP elections as allof the exit polls are showing. please go and check the figures on Tv chanels or wait till 10th may. second there is no chance of BJP atleast in the UP polls , BJP will score somwhere between 100-125 at most and will out of the race. Now the people like you should decide that where to go because there will not be any place to hide. The people of UP is well educated and understand the demand of development and voting for the right parties and candidates and you can't make them fool any more. You can't make fool by religion and cast any more. Congress willbe in decisive position in UP after polls and will be in power and that's good for the state. I can see a good time for the state.
RE:family issues
by Bengal Tiger on Apr 24, 2007 04:04 PM Permalink
Congress in a decisive position...:) seems you don't know anything about UP politics. BTW, all these exit polls are crap, check out what happened in Punjab. So, i guess plan your celebrations in Amethi as usual and beat the retreat. Because, Congress will once again fail.
RE:family issues
by Ram Sharma on Apr 24, 2007 03:20 PM Permalink
u r right. many parties like shiv sena, dmk, rjd are also dynastic parties. however the congress is the biggest of them and they have shown the path to others. but bjp and leftist parties party heads are not chosen on dynastic basis. bajpai, advani, rajnath, murli manohar etc. are not from same family. they all have led the party at different times. similarly jyoti basu and budhadev are not from the same family. in kerala also the present cm is not related to earlier leftist cms. but in case of congress, without someone from the dynasty, they cannot even remain united. they will just fight with each other. rao had somehow remained PM for 5 years by bribing some MPs openly in cash inside parliament and by frightening the dynasty with the bofors ghost.
RE:[object]
by rajendra kumar on Apr 24, 2007 04:26 PM Permalink
Your ex president went to pakistan to pay homage to mr. Mohmad ali Zinah, that is a kind of party you belong to.
RE:[object MouseEvent]
by Bengal Tiger on Apr 24, 2007 03:27 PM Permalink
Congress had set the bad example at national level the rest that is happening is just mere copy/paste stuff. Our, politicians are no different than bollywood.
RE:[object]
by overblown on Apr 24, 2007 06:44 PM Permalink
raj kutar the examples you gave for the bjp is different. There no one in the bjp just because of his/her surname given the top post of the party president straight off. For your information manvender singh fought election from a place where conress won from last 50 yrs and he won it for the bjp. As in rahul gandhi he did not go to his strong hold and his grandmothers and mothers, fathers etc region to fight election. So get the facts right. Yo cannot compare bjp to these other parties and specially the congress. How did sonia become president of the congress just because she is a gandhi??
RE:family issues
by overblown on Apr 24, 2007 06:52 PM Permalink
no wonder congress and sonia win elections because there are people like rajendra kumar. Illiterate to the core. You can read his article and figure out. One more thing sonia did no sacrifice as she knew she could not be the prime minister of this country because of legalities. And mr rajendra kumar which country would allow not a natural citizen to be the head of the country? Bahu my left ball.
