If a few of our billionaires (along with ordinary folk) contribute a huge endowment could be created! Anil Agarwal is setting up Vedanta with $1 billion of his own money (he has $5 billion). Maybe if some of our other multi-billionaires could be encouraged to spare a little for this noble cause we could once again have this great University.
RE:An endowment should be started!
by abcd on Apr 24, 2007 08:43 PM Permalink
yea and they better not start RESERVATION in that university since it will be my wise guess that there werent any at that time....so why now??
RE:An endowment should be started!
by Golu Gayani on Apr 24, 2007 10:05 PM Permalink
Abcd, reservation was created by sick menatality folkks to show discrimination at the root level. By generating reservation they showed Indian society that it is not one social and communal group. That is why in ancient India there was no reservation. Even though every community had difference of labor, work and jobs to do, but because there were no reservations, every one lived in Peace.
RE:An endowment should be started!
by on Apr 24, 2007 10:24 PM Permalink
You are absolutely wrong, In ancient India also we have reservations but not for dalits, its for Brahmins..Only Brahmins are allowed to study "Vedas" . Entire higher education is reserved for Brahmins, that is more dangerous than present day reservation system.
RE:An endowment should be started!
by r patil on Apr 25, 2007 11:39 PM Permalink
If only brahmins were allowed to study veda how can you explain krishna,rama,and hunuman being well versed in vedas ?Even after 60 yrs of independence how many hindus buy vedas and study them specaily from dalit caste ?Nalanda unversity was a buddhist unversity caste is not a restrain to become a monk or a priest atleast in that religion ,did the unversity prevent anybody for caste reason then how do explain foreign students.You people are so blind with hate for brahmins y'll present anythings without any proof.why do you beleive that kings,genrals ,merchants(india had trade with arab,european,egypt and south asian countries) where they all illeterate? What prevented kings and noble men(who were non brahmins most of the time) to open school and unversity for all caste people(which in fact they did).
In India one does not have to have a Nalandha University to teach that"all human are same "
Bhagvan in the Bhagvad geetha (5:18) has said " Vidhya vinaya sampanna........."
Translation :" The knowledgeable one ( jnani ) sees the Brahmana rich in knowledge and humility with the same mentality as the cow, the dog,the chandala( dog-eater)".
But then, probably none of us can be defined as "the knowledgeable one".
And one cant see much of humility here, on this board, either.
I request that before writing anything which will be read world-wide, you please check the facts. Bhagwaan Mahavir is not a founder of Jainism but rather our suprememost teacher and a reformer of Jainism. Jainism has no concept of God. We believe every soul has the capacity and power to be God like (like Mahavir) provided we get rid of all karmas. Before Mahavir, in this cycle of life, we had 23 such noble and divine people. Mahavir is the 24th, who reformed Jainism and spread the messages of Jainsim to a wider population. Messages such as Non-Violence in not just actions but in mind because violence begins in mind, Forgiveness and Friendship towards ever soul, and walking on the path of Moksha.
RE:Mahavir not a founder of Jainism
by BhejaFry on Apr 24, 2007 08:39 PM Permalink
I think it was Adinath Rishabhdev.not 100% sure though.Mahavir was the last one.They are called 'Tirthankars'.
RE:Mahavir not a founder of Jainism
by Dipali K J on Apr 24, 2007 10:04 PM Permalink
Yes, we call the 24 perfect souls Tirthankars. The first one for this time cycle is Rishabhdev (Adinath). But he wasn't the founder either. Jainism's belief is far beyond that. A fraction of the vast information one needs to know on Jainism is available on the following link and on Wikipedia as well. A true Jain is not just someone born as a Jain and who does not eat onions, potatoes, carrots etc (anything grown beneath the soil because these vegetables contain innumerable germs thus, innumerable souls) but also one who knows how important Non-Violence is, how important it is to rise above the Material World is, how important it is to know that everything except the soul is perishable, and thus do only good karmas to reach Moksha. One who knows this, will never fight for anything material but rather fight with oneself and resist these tempations. That person will know that human life is gifted to do good deeds, and reach infinite bliss.
(extracted from Buddhist Pilgrimage, by Bro Chan Khoon San)
There were two devastations on an extensive scale of Buddhist shrines and monasteries of northern India.
The first was by the Ephthalites or White Huns, who invaded India in 500-520 AD and conquered the border provinces of Gandhara and Kashmir.
The Hun king, Mihirakula was a barbarian and a sworn enemy of Buddhism, bent on destroying the Buddhist establishment.
The Gupta kings fought on and off against the Huns but it was not until 533 AD that Mihirakula was subjugated by Yasodharman of Mandasor.
Hsüan Tsang, who passed through Gandhara and Kashmir one hundred years later, heard about the devastation and reported that in Gandhara alone,
%u201CMihirakula overthrew stupas and destroyed monasteries, altogether one thousand and six hundred foundations.%u201D
Why is it that only Muslim Invasion is mentioned in the article?
During the Pala period of its history from the 9th -11th century AD, Buddhism became heavily adulterated by the Tantric cult, with its magic spells, yoga and practices that were completely alien to the earlier form of Buddhism. Prior to this in the Gupta period (c. 300-550 AD), the Mahayana doctrine had reached the stage whereby Arahantship was openly condemned and Bodhisattaship held up as the goal towards which every good Buddhist should aim. According to the Pali scholar Rhys Davids in his book %u201CThe History and Literature of Buddhism%u201D, the whole exposition of this theory was set in the Lotus Sutra or the Saddharma Pundarika as it is called in Sanskrit. It was so subversive of the original Buddhism and even claimed to have been preached by the Buddha himself.
During the Gupta period, more philosophical speculations in the Mahayana tradition emerged and led to the worship of various Mahayanist gods and %u201CBodhisattas%u201D conceived to symbolize the philosophical speculations.
According to Rhys Davids, as time went on, converts to the Mahayana who were well acquainted with the Hindu deities of the day, conveniently adopted many Hindu deities into the Buddhist pantheon.
These Hindu deities were represented as %u201CBodhisattas%u201D and supporters of the Buddha in order to bring about reconciliation between the two faiths and to attract more devotees.
These practices formed the basis for the development of Tantrayana by Buddhists who adopted the methods of Hindu Tantrists by incorporating Vedic and Hindu beliefs into the religion (refer to Indian Buddhism by Hajime Nakamura).
Buddhism was now reduced to an esoteric cult in which spells and magic rites and practices supposedly capable of producing supernatural effects predominated. Tantric mystics were accepted as great leaders who claimed to have discovered the shortest route to Deliverance. In some quarters, it was believed that the %u201Cgrace of the teacher%u201D was sufficient for the realization of the Sublime.
Some of these hindu gurus openly ridiculed the monastic code and even propagated mass indulgence in wine and women.
Here comes the Turkish Invaders:
The discovery in the ruins of Nalanda of several Tantric images, all of which belonged to the Pala period of its history, provides evidence of the development of Tantrayana at Nalanda University.
According to Ven. Jagdish Kashyap (Chapter 1, Path of the Buddha), Buddhism had become so polluted and weakened by these perverted forms of practice that it became practically impossible to revive after the destruction of the Mahayana temples and monasteries by the Muslim invaders.
RE:He doesn't truly know Islam unless he knows what Jahiliya (Ignorance) is! Hazrat Umar (RA)
by anir garud on Apr 24, 2007 08:00 PM Permalink
Hey buddy, stop throwing one off evidence. Read my earlier reply. To give you gist -
Let's accept facts buddy Islam has spread using the force of sword.
Face another fact, your ansestors feared for life, like cowards meeked out and out of fear converted!
Face another fact, its not the muslims that is the problem its the islam that teaches them to be bad. Don't forget, that the destruction you are (appear to be?) regretting today, the Mughals were thinking they were doing God's duty!
All I can say that you are qualified to become professor at the JNU university and write some books on Indian history, and those books will then become textbooks in schools and colleges across the secular India.
RE:He doesn't truly know Islam unless he knows what Jahiliya (Ignorance) is! Hazrat Umar (RA)
by BhejaFry on Apr 25, 2007 02:51 PM Permalink
amazing,u guys have a excuse and justification for every invasion and destruction!
About the accusition of muslims for destroying the nalanda university-thats kinda true%u2026But%u2026Nalanda university was within the Pala Empire.After the resistence against the muslim invaders became hopeless the Pala forces took shelter in the university and built up resistance against Bakhtiar khilji.
Besides the gigantic structure of the Nalanda university was mistaken by the forces of Bakhtiar as fortified castles.
So they had nothin to do but to rage it to the ground.
I am a Bangladeshi and Muslim.But i mam proud of our Buddhist ancestors.I think the destruction of the universities of Nalanda,Vikramshila,Jagaddala vihar was a severe blow towards the civilization and archaeological relics of Bengal which could be avoided by the Muslims.
But Sompur Mahavihara the greatest buddhist vihara in the sub-continent is still standing in Paharpur in Bangladesh which is announcing the excellence of the Buddhist Pala empire with all its grandeur.
I here want to mention a remark by Mr.J.C.French who said with frief: %u201CEvery year we spend milliond of dollar for the research of the Pyramids of egypt had we spent only one percent of that mone for the excavation of the gigantic structure in Paharpur who knows what extrra-ordinary discoveries could have been made.
About the perishing of budhism from India what i want to say the Guptas did not exterminated buddhism.As the Guptas were Bengali they were more liberal.Many ministers and courtmen of the Guptas were Buddhist and dong forget that the later Guptas accepted Budhism -
Buddhagupta,Vanugupta,Tathagata gupta et al.After Harshavardhana when buddhists were persecuted throughout India and was gradually being absorved into Hinduism the PAlas emerge as the saviour of Buddhism.
They patroned Buddhism for 400 years.
After the fall of the Palas the Sena dynasty who came from Karnataka introduced caste system and orthodox Brahminism.
The people of Eastern Bengal who were Buddhist majority disgusted at this accepted Islam en masse while the hindu majority west Bengal remained so.
RE:Kullul Haqq Walou Murra (SAW) Speak the Truth even if it is Bitter (SAW)
by prakash kumar on Apr 24, 2007 07:08 PM Permalink
Good way to justify the henious acts of Islam. We need not go back to the 12th century , the recent respect of muslims towards budhhisim can be seen in afghnisatan. Regarding you story, the entire nalanda university came into exisitene under the gupta's and harshvardhana. Regarding buddisim its better muslims dont take about any other religion because they don't understand the essence of free thinking. Its this essence of free thinking is what led to some different ways of worshipping in this holy land of bharat.
RE:RE:Kullul Haqq Walou Murra (SAW) Speak the Truth even if it is Bitter (SAW)
by BhejaFry on Apr 24, 2007 08:47 PM Permalink
oh..nalanda was destroyed innocently by mistake ? whats the excuse for destroying other buddhist universities like Takshashila (now in pakistan), Vikramshila,Jagaddala vihar ?
RE:Kullul Haqq Walou Murra (SAW) Speak the Truth even if it is Bitter (SAW)
by anir garud on Apr 24, 2007 07:48 PM Permalink
I am sorry to say but your text is littered with such beautiful "typical" Islamic (and Marxists) thinking and excuses.
Like, you seem to be very very lenient on the Mughals/Muslims but don't loose an opportunity to take snibe/blame at the hindus. And you are so away from the truth!
You say destruction of so many universities could be avoided? Avoided? They looked like castles? Are you saying that Mughals were so stupid that they did not distinguish between a castle and a non-castle before planning their attacks? Ha!! Buddy, they knew very well they were getting rid of the kafirs (and this includes the buddhiss! Even today!!), their institutions and their teachings! There are not one or two, 30,000 temples destroyed by the mughals, Mughal memoirs themselves clearly say that they were very proud of doing it! But the islamists and the marxists maintain "oh no there was money in the temples and on the idols"! What a beautiful distortion of truth! Mind you, this is what is happening in Kashmir also today - non-muslim schools are destroyed, libraries/books are burnt etc etc etc.
Let's accept facts buddy Islam has spread using the force of sword. The Brahminish could have contributed to it but it was no competition to the atrocities and the fear perpetrated by the Mughals.
Face another fact, your ansestors feared for life, like cowards meeked out and out of fear converted!
Face another fact, its not the muslims that is the problem its the islam that teaches them to be bad. Don't forget, that the destruction you are (appear to be?) regretting today, the Mughals were thinking they were doing God's duty!
All I can say that you are qualified to become professor at the JNU university and write some books on Indian history, and those books will then become textbooks in schools and colleges across the %u201Csecular%u201D India.
RE:Kullul Haqq Walou Murra (SAW) Speak the Truth even if it is Bitter (SAW)
by Ekalavyan Acharyan on Apr 24, 2007 07:21 PM Permalink
Inavders(you know who) burnt it down or rather annhilated the whole thing because they felt threatened by the knowledge which Nalanda held. So, they killed everyone, burnt its libraries and destoryed everything. Please don't try and justify which is simply unjustfiable.
The Chinese scholar, Hsuen-Tsiang (or Xuanzang in today's Pinyin spelling), who visited India in 630 A.D. under the Guptas and stayed for some time at Nalanda, has left us a vivid description of the university. He wrote of "richly adorned towers" with observatories "lost in the vapours of the morning". The university's architecture was remarkable, with nine-storey buildings, eight separate compounds, ten temples, several meditation halls, a great library and dozens of classrooms. Its setting, too, was full of beauty, dotted with lakes and parks.
The accounts of foreign travellers portray a university throbbing with intellectual excitement, a centre of learning devoted not only to the study of Buddhist texts but of Hindu philosophy, the Vedas, and theology in general; logic, grammar and linguistics; the practice of medicine and the study of other sciences, notably mathematics and astronomy; and more down-to-earth subjects like politics, the art of war and even handicrafts. Contemporary visitors speak of a system of education that went well beyond the oral recitation and rote-learning normally practised in monasteries. Nalanda's teachers practised a variety of instructional methods: exposition was followed by debate and discussion, lectures featured lengthy question-and-answer sessions, and ideas were illuminated by extensive resort to parables and stories. Admission required a strict oral examination; literally so, since strangers were not permitted to enter unless they could satisfactorily answer a number of questions from the gatekeeper testifying to their basic level of educational attainment.
RE:nal
by ritesh on Apr 24, 2007 06:33 PM Permalink
Dear Karthik,
I thankyou for the matter that you had posted.I always felt that the discussion board is more like a Blog , but I really felt happy reading the matter.
RE:nal
by ab on Apr 24, 2007 06:35 PM Permalink
Its true muslims rulers have followed a very cowardise approach through out their small history because they were scared and insecure of other religions preaching peace and harmony. thats y they destroyed such great centres of learning such as nalanda because of their inner insecurity and inferiority complex. Even if u look today all muslim terrorists are COWARDS who hide and kill people, if they are brave enough they shud come in the battlefield and wage a war,but sadly that wil only happen if they hav any mettle in them and since they dont they only hide behind the bushes and fire that all they know
RE:nal
by Golu Gayani on Apr 24, 2007 09:58 PM Permalink
Thanks Karthik. Your message is so heart touching. I can close my eyes and visualize what would have this University been then. I am so greatful that there are highly knowledged readers with rediff.
If this happens,it will be a great surprise for pride for all Indians!!!!
I have doubts as this is happening in Bihar,where corruption is at root level.No one will process the paper without taking money.Major funds may go for Nitish Kumar party election in future to retain the power.
You wont see any Muslims in such discussions, they only come when we talk about terroism,then they know we will be talking about Islam.. but what Islam has destroyed in India they will completely avoid looking at those.. becoz in their subconscious they know they will get cought if they talk great about Islam here..
In 1193, the Nalanda University complex was sacked by Turkic Muslim invaders under Bakhtiyar Khilji; this event is seen as a milestone in the decline of Buddhism in India. It is said that Khilji asked if there was a copy of the Koran at Nalanda before he sacked it[citation needed]. When the Tibetan translator Chag Lotsawa visited them in 1235, he found them damaged and looted, but still functioning with a small number of monks. The destruction of the universities at Nalanda, as well as the destruction of many temples and monasteries throughout northern India which housed centers of learning, is considered by many historians to be responsible for the sudden demise of ancient Indian scientific thought in mathematics, astronomy, alchemy, and anatomy.[17] Fortified Sena monasteries along the main route of the invasion were destroyed, and being off the main route both Nalanda and Bodh Gaya survived. Many institutions off the main route such as the Jagaddala Monastery in northern Bengal were untouched and flourishing.
RE:nal
by Samir Ankalikar on Apr 24, 2007 06:35 PM Permalink
some people ( historians) call khilji to be an art lover and the only one of his time to be secular and promoter of peace. his barbarism mentioned above clearly mentions that these historians were terribly wrong.
RE:nal
by Venkat Krishnan on Apr 24, 2007 08:55 PM Permalink
Samir: Yes, those historians are precisely the left wing communist historians who have tried to hide the atrocitiy facts of Khilji, Bhamini Sultans etc. The atrocities of Aurangazeb are not told in history text books. But its there in the collective memory of the people.
Actually, who are Indian muslims? They are originally Hindus or Buddhists and were forced to convert to Moslem at the edge of the sword. If you ask who is your great great great grand father is.. 95% of the time he would have been a Hindu or Buddhist.
RE:nal
by Ahmad Rais Siddiqi on Apr 25, 2007 12:57 PM Permalink
My dear Mr.Venkat Krishnan, Namaskaar/aadaabarz, I read yr comments about the Muslims ruler of India like Allaudin Khilji,Bhamini Sultans and Aurangzeb who in yr opinion were responsible for cheap atrocities in India. No doubts,they had been doing so which I believe was not good but it is also prohibitted to distroy any place of worship. Distoying of Buddha's statue in Afghanistan was also very sad. Distrpying of any temples by Aurangzeb in India was also very bad. Distroying of Babri Masjid also gave a bad impression.9/11 was the cheapest.Attack on Parliament was worst. Any such cheap and mean acts were all bad I and I condemn all these by heart. I am Indian Muslim and alwys write against these cheap and mean acts of these terrorists or anybody. For yr knowledge,I want to share with you that not all Indian Muslims are converted but of course a very large numbers had convertd to Islam not because of any force or fear but they were also discarded in thier on caste system as SC/STs are now facing these problems.Whereas,in Islam are all equal and they eat,sleep and dream togather without any fear. I am one of those Indian Muslims whose forefathers had come from Saudi Arabia some one thousand years back. But,in Islam all r equal so it makes no difference if u r an Indian or Irani. But,distroying of Nalanda University by any Muslim ruler was not good if it is fact which I heard from u people only here now. But to my own belief,I think that the very first father and the very first mother were the same for you and me.So you are my cousin now so I love each man just like my real brother and each woman just like my own sister except therelashinship they maintain with me. Ok Did you understand what I mean here. Do not hate anybody by caste,creede or colours but actions only. I love you all my dear amen and women of this lovely planet Earth. Anyway thanks for yr comments and feel free to contact me. Khudahafiz and F.A.Allah. Yr's Sincerely and Duago, Engineer Ahmad Rais Siddiqi(Alig) International radio/tv commentator & Quiz Master, Science,sports and features writer. E mail;araissiddiqi@rediffmail.vom
RE:nal
by Venkata Vittala on Apr 26, 2007 02:02 AM Permalink
Dear Mr. Ahmad Rais siddiqi. Your statement about in ISLAM all equal is not true. I am giving you few lines from wikipedia site:
Historians such as Will Durant contend that Islam spread through violence. Sir Jadunath Sarkar contends that that several Muslim invaders were waging a systematic jihad against Hindus in India to the effect that "Every device short of massacre in cold blood was resorted to in order to convert heathen subjects. "In particular the records kept by al-Utbi, Mahmud al-Ghazni's secretary, in the Tarikh-i-Yamini document several episodes of bloody military campaigns. Hindus who converted to Islam however were not completely immune to persecution due to the Caste system among South Asian Muslims in India established by Ziauddin al-Barani in the Fatawa-i Jahandari., where they were regarded as an "Ajlaf" caste and subjected to discrimination by the "Ashraf" castes.
RE:[object]
by Ahmad Siddiqi on Apr 26, 2007 04:44 PM Permalink
Respected Mr.Venkat Vittal Saheb, Namaskar/aadaabarz huzure wals. Thanks for yr response. Historians like Will Durant and Sir Jadunath Sarkar had wrtten something which was true that several Muslim invaders waged jihad against not only Hindus but others too in India and other places. Jihad did not mean fighting against any religion but who does not believe in God only. Those killed during the Jihad were declared Jihadi and were supposed to go to Jannat(Paradise) directly as it is the biggest honour for any muslim. But in many cases invaders,wrongly,called their personnal fights as a Jihad also which were wrong and so the historians have mentioned that several muslim invaders did so. But,I think such Jihad is not correct and so every body hates such things. I believe one should have the knowledge,courage,confidance and true soirit to convince u so that u understand what he means and then if u r convinced and accept his faith,whether,Islam,Hinduism,Sikhism,Budhism or even Christianity or any faith then it it would be real a faith.But,so many faiths are just confusing us. Why not all Maulwies,Pandits and heads of all faiths sit togather and make one and only one faith and that will be the best faith. In my own faith,love,help,sacrifice and satisfaction are the main points and so I am a very very happy and satisfied person.whatever Nature(God,Bhagwaan,Allah)had given me is best for me and I am satisfied with it. So I love you all just like my real brother and sister except the relashionship you maintain with me. I thank u once again for yr feed back. Pl feel free to contact me.I shall be grateful to u Sir. Regards. Ur's Sincerely, Er.Ahmad Rais Siddiqi(Alig) E mail;araissiddiqi@rediffmail.com (M)09868390783 Ph;011 26941345(R).New Delhi,INDIA.
RE:nal
by r patil on Apr 26, 2007 12:06 AM Permalink
Dear Ahmad Rais Siddiqi you are being totally brainwashed by Maxsist and muslim historians.Caste was not the reason for conversion how can you explain kashmiri pandits becoming muslims why do they have surnames like Guru,gyani,bhat,kashap and many similar hindu brahmin surnames?Did your ancestors read the whole of koran and hadiths (which is in arabic) and then converted ? If so how did they convince their soul about slavery,about right hand possesses,mal-e-milkat,about treament given to kafirs and women? Where they so brain dead they did not find anything wrong in it.At any rate that does not explain why they left their own Gods for fault of their fellow beings. Please dont club St with Sc they have not faced untoushbility and their females enjoy more right then any other religion group fmales. Why where hindu Sc always more then muslims why all of them did not convert en mass .(they might be angry with other hindu for the practise of untouchbility but they are not against their god )Can you explain how come their are few hindu sc caste left in pakistan why have them not become muslims long back and how are they treated in pakistan ?
RE:RE:nal
by Ahmad Siddiqi on Apr 26, 2007 04:21 PM Permalink
Respected Mr.R Patil, Namaskaar/aadaabarz huzur e wala; Thanks for yr reaction on my opinion. Pl read my comments completely and than u would be able to understand my belief? Anybody who had fought wars for converting the people from one faith to another was not good in my opinion. I once again, tell u that the "Holy Quran" does not allow such things but even then some people had been doing such things in the past and some r still doing the same which is not good. what,I read in the history books,I shared with u but eventhen if such things happen again and again than what can I do expcet expressing my personnal views on various forums like rediffmail.com. Still many Muslims do not like my writings when I condemn them like attack on Parliament,9/11 and others. I told earlier that I believ that u and me and all human biengs are from one male and one female(what we believe were "Adam and Eve"). So u r my cousin and I love u just like my real brother. Take it easy and be in touch with me. Reagrds. Er.Ahmad Rais Siddiqi(Alig) E mail araissiddiqi@rediffmail.com dt;26/04.07 (M)09868390783(NEW DELHI),INDIA.
kudos to the thinkers of 21st century for ideating the re-con of the nalanda university... on second thoughts, nalanda (even)today stands in bihar! that's not the bihar of the old nalanda we know! the culture, ideology and philosophy of the people and the government will make a big difference to the future of the new university! imagine a 'world-class' university in a land held by the the law-unabiding people! no offence to none of the indians reading this space (including friends from bihar), but certainly point to think, ka keh te ho, bhaaaee?
do not indulge in criticising. Bihar has given great people to India. It is the capital of India few centuries ago. Bihar actively participated in the freedon struggle.
Every state has its positive side and a negetive side.
Criticising each other will not lead to a healthy discussion. Please abstain from it.
RE:bihar!
by Balaji Krishnamurthy on Apr 24, 2007 08:53 PM Permalink
I am not a Bihari and I agree with you. We need to objectively study why Bihar became the way it has. After all the state which gave people
RE:bihar!
by Balaji Krishnamurthy on Apr 24, 2007 08:54 PM Permalink
I am not a Bihari and I agree with you. We need to objectively study why Bihar became the way it has. After all the state which gave people
RE:bihar!
by Kunal Yadav on Apr 24, 2007 06:32 PM Permalink
The Asuras of Lanka (Mr. Srinivasan & Co.) are the Devatas of Modern India. We must incipate Nalanda University in Chennai, a land of law-abiding people.
Srinivasan-bhai, jaa le jaa Nalanda University !! Hamnee ek naya Vishwa-Vidayala banaiab jo ki Nalanda se bhi badhiya hoyee...
