USA has generously giving grants to PAKISTAN and always denies INDIA. It is failure of POLITICAL system of INDIA, and Politicians in-fighting has become reason for denial. All the political parties should own this responsibility and take retirement from Politics. As MPs are involved in Human-trafficking for supplying to females,and child for prostitution. Our Politicinas runs International Prostitution Racket.The enforcement agencies try to trap others to save Thick Skinned Politicians. Like Nithari, where only Servant was charged leaving main culprit free, This time also betal owner,travelgaents will be prosecuted and MP will be set FREE. Its a shame on our Country.
RE:I've an idea!
by Bengal Tiger on Apr 22, 2007 02:25 PM Permalink
Good one, his daughter is in USA that is why the soft corner. You got to understand these parivar politics.
They are like parents saying to the childrens no to smoke and while they have big puffs of cigars . India shud go back with austrlia for its uranium America stinks they dont want ne developing country to develop just themshelves anbd pretend they are interested in world peace but is all big lies american policy why they dint say before all this bull shit
Look at the history of appointment of Manmohan Singh. Dr.Askoe Mitra was sacked in 1973 under pressure from the world Bank, who has put Manmohan Singh as the Chief Economic Adviser. In 1991 the same World Bank put pressure on Narasimha Rao to put Manmohan singh as the Finance minister. Who are the heads of the world Bank, all appointed by the President of USA. Thus, Manmohan singh was appointed by the US administration. He has served his master very well so far. against the advice of Muchkund Dubey, the Chief Negotiator to the GATT, Manmohan Singh without any referendum or voting in the parliament, forced India to join WTO. As a result even the street markets in Bangalore or Chennai are now flooded with Chinese textiles and Indian farmers are committing suicides. Now against opinion of all nuclear scientists of India Manmohan Singh without the opinion of the country, the people and the parliament will sign the Indo-US Nuclear Treaty and gave away Indian's nuclear defence against China and Pakistan. That is what USA wants and the slave prime-minister of India is doing his job perfectly.
RE:Indian Surrender to USA
by Bengal Tiger on Apr 22, 2007 12:54 PM Permalink
He is a slave to Italians not Usa, he is just the unofficial PM, the official PM is at 10 Janpath.
RE:Indian Surrender to USA
by ashish bhalla on Apr 22, 2007 12:56 PM Permalink
Rightly said Dipak, and huess why he is more an anti-national now than he was before 1982? get the picture? yea it might be a conspiracy theory but it really fits the bill. Hi antagonism towards this country and his leaning towards the west and Sonia (a foreigner) truly reflects his demonic plans for this country.Woe betide him!!
Everyone involved should realize that the deal requires virtual moratorium on any further nuclear test. The PM has done his best to suppress any debate on this issue in the parliament. What was he hiding? The treaty was touted as US capitulation and triumph of India. The press also painted a similar picture. There should be honest an debate in India since Indian people are very sensitive on sovereignty.
RE:Deal requires virtual moratorium on any further nuclear test
by Vimala S on Apr 22, 2007 11:43 AM Permalink
You are 100% true Minto! Apart from the Nuclear deal America has to lift financial sanctions against India, and also in future, America should not go to that extent, we we do our nuclear testings. They should forget about punishing India. Otherwise genuine friendship is not there. And we cannot do anymore slavery.
RE:Deal requires virtual moratorium on any further nuclear test
by hi on Apr 22, 2007 10:25 AM Permalink
No thrump or capituation or anything to anybody. To satisfy some power requirement & to supply some fuel, we need to have some treaty, that is called deal. Have lot of discussions done in rediff about that, go & read the deal about in detail.
Dear Sir, Question is 1]Whether USA wants to have this deal or not? If not there can be good excuses for avoiding it. 2]India can search alternatives. 3]USA has very simple equation - Are you enough powerful and / or effecting their Status - Tnen no internal laws etc come in the way. 4]Say today YES or NO. Why linger?
RE:NUKE DEAL BETWEEN USA & INDIA
by Sanjay Bhakat on Apr 22, 2007 10:05 AM Permalink
hi hi ... linger is a correct word as per Oxford dictionary ... it means holding ones decision for eternity, I coudn't find the word CUROUS ... what it means u THE intelligent?
RE:NUKE DEAL BETWEEN USA & INDIA
by hi on Apr 22, 2007 10:08 AM Permalink
Thanks for the explanation. Help me in other places also, instead of scolding me with m### ch$$, mf words.
i think our pm is literally bending down to accomodate the us,it pains us indians to see our pm behave like an invertebrate.when sonia chose him to be the pm one had visions of india achieving a high economic growth,and holding its head high in this global world,unfortunately india's booming growth is not reaching the have-nots,&this act to accomodating us without giving a thought about the country's prestige&dignity is really very shameful.it appears that m'mohan singh still dreams for a world bank posting after his stint as pm.
RE:us says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with india
by hi on Apr 22, 2007 09:48 AM Permalink
Not only India is growing, whole asia is growing. It is because, others choose what they want. For India, there are lot of restrictions, formalties, lot of un-wanted guys recommandations.
RE:us says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with india
by Soumen Mondal on Apr 22, 2007 11:28 AM Permalink
It's shame to see such type of messages. And I really feel pity for the author. Come on mate.. grow up from ur communist and bullsh*t attitudes. You are living in 21st century not in a feudal era..
RE:us says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with india
by Rajan Kumar on Apr 22, 2007 11:49 AM Permalink
Mr Biswanath Roy, either you are a complete insane person, or else you must be considered a blot of intellect and character of India. You are talking about a selfless person, who is not a politician, and who has single handedly changed the destiny of India by ushering in the economic reforms in 1991, and that too in a country of shameles, stupid people like you. Fools like you do not realise the great luck they are enjoying right now - of having the most qualified, honest, humble and selfless persons as our Heads of state (PM and President), in a country of fools (like your kind self), criminals, corrupted society (not only politicians and bureaucrats but ordinary people are also highly corrupt) with no capabilities, expertise, character or sense. Please first look at your own wretched self and your family and your othere near and dear ones and their shocking irresponsibilty, and do something about it before you even dare to think about a noble person like our PM.
RE:RE:us says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with india
by prasidh.r on Apr 22, 2007 12:30 PM Permalink
MR. RAJAN KUMAR, YOU ARE THE GREATEST FOOL TO CALL HIM NOBLE WITH HIS CURRENT IDIOTIC FINANCE MINISTER CHIDAMBARAM. SUCCUMBING TO US LAWS WILL ONLY LET DOWN THE TECHNICAL ADVANCEMENTS OF INDIA IN THE FIELD OF NUCLEAR SCIENCES AND WEAPONRY. THE US's DEAL REQUIRES INDIA TO SNAP OFF ALL TIES WITH IRAN AND REDUCE NUCLEAR INTERACTIONS WITH RUSSIA. STUPIDS LIKE YOU WOO THE AMERICAN DEAL WHICH CAN MAKE INDIA DEPENDENT ON THEM FOREVER. US IS ONLY LOOKING FOR A UNIPOLAR WORLD AND A BASE TO SUPRESS IRAN AND RUSSIA. THESE COUNTRIES WERE THE REAL ALLIES OF INDIA DURING ANY CRISIS OR WAR AND US WAS ALWAYS WITH PAKISTAN. INDIA SHOULD NOT IMPAIR THE RELATIONS WITH IRAN AND RUSSIA FOR THE SAKE OF THE GREEDY AMERICANS.
RE:us says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with india
by Dipak Bose on Apr 22, 2007 12:23 PM Permalink
Look at the history of appointment of Manmohan Singh. Dr.Askoe Mitra was sacked in 1973 under pressure from the world Bank, who has put Manmohan Singh as the Chief Economic Adviser. In 1991 the same World Bank put pressure on Narasimha Rao to put Manmohan singh as the Finance minister. Who are the heads of the world Bank, all appointed by the President of USA. Thus, Manmohan singh was appointed by the US administration. He has served his master very well so far. against the advice of Muchkund Dubey, the Chief Negotiator to the GATT, Manmohan Singh without any referendum or voting in the parliament, forced India to join WTO. As a result even the street markets in Bangalore or Chennai are now flooded with Chinese textiles and Indian farmers are committing suicides. Now against opinion of all nuclear scientists of India Manmohan Singh without the opinion of the country, the people and the parliament will sign the Indo-US Nuclear Treaty and gave away Indian's nuclear defence against China and Pakistan. That is what USA wants and the slave prime-minister of India is doing his job perfectly.
US law is tobe valiadated in US not in Indai. So if according to US law some changes are to be made and that to on Indian expenses then let them change we do not want their nuclear technology we have our own and we should develop our own to make them ask us for it. Dont even try for them to come here and boast about themselves. These english men are boasting type of fellows and would always try to treat us as men from different planet and want to tame us .
Put on our own laws to eradicate the difference and let them come to table on equal grounds.
RE:US says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with India
by Sanjay Bhakat on Apr 22, 2007 10:12 AM Permalink
hello jatinder ... what progress and our nuclear technology are u shouting about? Our nuclear technology whatever we have is basic in nature ... moreover USA providing India with superior nuclear technology not because they want to do charity, its a geo-political strategy and India should be wise enough to take advantage of that rather than taking ideas from people like u. Be practical man. what was the terrorism status before sept 11? It was concentrated mainly in Indian Kashmir ... after that what happened ... kashmir is no more the ground of ferocious terrorism it has been taken to their home ground ... in Gulf. Think about it u racist.
RE:US says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with India
by Chandra SK on Apr 22, 2007 11:16 AM Permalink
If somebody wants to help you, how come they want you not to test your weapons?
RE:US says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with India
by Adam Marshall on Apr 22, 2007 12:43 PM Permalink
Mr. Sanjay Bhakat, what is US trying to provide India? Do you atleast know that? You are just wooing the americans for the sake of wooing them. US will be providing its surplus nuclear fuel to India and will be reaping the products for its own use. This is only going to snub the Indian technology more. And regarding your comments the Indian nuclear technology, it was the Indian nuclear test series that made US prefer India for its nuclear deal. Secondly regarding terrorism, There has only been an increase in terrorism with the present governments idiotic vote bank politics and Kashmir has become a worse place after pulling back the troops giving a free room for terrorists. September 11th has got nothing to do with the India- US nuke deal. It was US who trained the terrorists to subdue Russia and it is the US military hardware that's being used by Pakistan's forces (the sponsorers of terrorism). What has the nuke deal go to do with race you fool?
RE:US says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with India
by hi on Apr 22, 2007 10:18 AM Permalink
There is some places terrorism never put its foot in the history, those people doesn't know about the terrorism & its evil effects. Let us hope that everybody understand about terrorism & its ill effects.
RE:RE:US says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with India
by Vimala S on Apr 22, 2007 11:59 AM Permalink
Think of the Devil and there he is!! See ..the fire will never go out ..if one keeps it alive...Imagine it this way ..ofcourse bit unusal..but it is better to hide and express...in decent terms. America is helping India, and expecting something in turn..which is not there or rather which should not be there. It is like signing with the invisible ink. America is giving a suitcase with money with a Bomb, which is expected to burst on opening the suit case, and expecting India to sign that India should not deactivate the Bomb , before opening the suitcase. We are Indians and we will sure have our security measures and verify 100% before opening and it is our nature, conservative nature, inhibited from our anccesstors. Even if there is a minute chance of possibility, we will not risk and dare to venture. On the whole, it is advisible for India , not to sign the deal.
RE:RE:RE:US says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with India
by jatinder sareen on Apr 22, 2007 12:28 PM Permalink
Hello that was a fare ans , Thanks. All I want is that the people should fight against terror mechanisism and allow any such things which are being instigated for purchase by US and our pro US technology friends are bent to gather some pride in doing so.In India every one knows that there is thorium and India has been successful in using it . So why not enhance this capacity for the domestic purpose . All it requires is a refining and re defining the scope involved. For this I am sure We dont require US .
RE:US says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with India
by hi on Apr 22, 2007 09:37 AM Permalink
I am an Indian, Englishmen is not there you won't write here too.
RE:[object]
by jatinder sareen on Apr 22, 2007 12:36 PM Permalink
There is no rachism here you may not be a tax payer or Indian thats the reason you think so .think if somebody drains your money and you dont know about it . If you put this amount to some medical relief or some better cause within India you can be sure that money drain without your knowing has gone to some good cause and not for buying nuclear tech from US or any other country who wants you to beg for it and take a excuse of US laws and other such things so that we should amend or bend for acheiving a deal which will long be due for payments and in addition you should know your limits as to howmuch one can allow the pocket to drain.
RE:US says no to changing its laws for nuke deal with India
by hi on Apr 22, 2007 09:36 AM Permalink
Englishmen is not there, you cannot write here too.
