'VOTE KE LIYE KUCH BHI KARNE KE LIYE THAYAR HO JATHE HAI YE CONGRESSWALE" I THINK ALL CONGRESS PEOPLE ARE BORN TO MUSLIMS THATS Y THEY ARE PRAISING THEMSELVES AS A MESSAISH OF MUSLIMS, PLZ DONT VOTE THE CONGRESS PARTY OTHERWISE THEY WILL CREATE 1 MORE PAKISTAN PEHLE SONIA KO BHAGAO, HIJADOAN KI FAUJ BANA RAHE HAI IDHAR!
The worst political party ever to plague india is the congress. It has not done anything since independence. This is a parasite that is eating out india. How many years does a country take to prosper into a developed region? They ruled this country and have taken us back. Everything is in pathetic state. That is because of this party. Shameless people and pathetic policies. The basic infrasturcture is not ready yet. BJP atleast started the express ways. This party should be banned to enter electoral race. I pray to god that this party never ever comes to power again.
Dear Congressmen, What about the debits ? Dawood and gang, the Bombay blast accused, The Godhra massacre accused, the Akshadaram temple attack accused etc. also owe their thrift to the congress.
Sania Mirza did not come up because of Congress. It was Mr N Chandrababu Naidu who supported Sania Mirza. He gave Rs.10 Lacs to get Sania trained at Nick Beloteri Academy in USA. Mr Imran Mirza followed up with Mr NCN for this.
RE:Sania Mirza
by Nadeem on Apr 20, 2007 12:02 PM Permalink
A humble request to EC and President of India to BAN this booklet immediately. It is clear cut defamation of Muslims and there ability. BAN KARO BAN KARO
And Congress should apologise for this act and request all to give a befiting reply to Congress if it does not come out clean on this.
RE:Sania Mirza
by Kaka Mehra on Apr 20, 2007 12:09 PM Permalink
Mr. Murthy, In whose rule Mr. Naidu got prospered ? In Congress Rule. Hence, who should be given credit for Sania, Congress ! Is it clear.
RE:Sania Mirza
by on Apr 20, 2007 05:34 PM Permalink
Aey Kaka if a Son was born to u would u say its because of Mr Man Mohan cause he is the Leader of Congress ,whom will u giv tat credit Rahul gandhi or Man Mohan Singh?
RE:Sania Mirza
by victor on Apr 20, 2007 01:05 PM Permalink
i think Mr. Mehra is demented... Mr Naidu prospered 'coz of his vision and nothing to do with congress...
if people are so keen on giving congress the credit what about all the corruption they have 'cozed in the country...
BJP did to the country in 5 yrs what congress was not able to do for 50 yrs...
A humble request to EC and President of India to BAN this booklet immediately. It is clear cut defamation of Muslims and there ability. BAN KARO BAN KARO
And Congress should apologise for this act and request all to give a befiting reply to Congress if it does not come out clean on this.
RE:Request to President / EC to BAN Booklet
by hiral joshi on Apr 20, 2007 11:58 AM Permalink
Nadeem bhai EC bhi to unka pitthu hai. I feel for self-respecting muslims like you.
The Muslim fundamentalism is getting its main thrust from somewhere in Pakistan which we all agree that is where it hets the tools to implement their shenanighans.
Now Pakistan is completely a tool of USofA which has to hold back or whatever its activity after 9/11 but 9/11 was not implemented by the muslims It is a common Knowledge in the US that it was actually implemented by the USA.
So now muslims rulers of pakistan were complicit in the killings of mulims in Afganistan and Iraq all this while US played a game of going after Osama bin laden and taliban which is all fake. Afganitan Presiden Karzai is a former carlyle group official who was cosen to head the country way in advance. Carlyl group was funded by osama's family and Bush the US president ran it.
So Muslims kill but they are just a tool in the hands of rouge elements in us admin who have various agendas like restricting US civil liberties and making money on war economy.
After Rahul Gandhi said "Gandhis created Bangladesh", COngress lost tons of Muslim Vote. So, naturally they are trying to get back some Muslim Vote. However, its taking middle class Hindus out of Congress fold! Muslim pampering cuts both ways!
The nore psuedos rally Muslims, the more they legitimize BJP/RSS.
RE:After Rahul Gandhi said ''Gandhis created Bangladesh'', COngress lost tons of Muslim Vote. So, naturally they are trying to get back some Muslim Vote. However, its taking middle class Hindus out of Congress fold! Muslim pampering cuts both ways!
by hiral joshi on Apr 20, 2007 11:59 AM Permalink
congress party's damage control exercise is more damaging. he he..
RE:Congress email address
by hiral joshi on Apr 20, 2007 11:52 AM Permalink
Your suggestion well taken but It will be a futile exercise as they dont care about us. All they want is muslims' votes in UP elections.
I think there is something missing. See the booklet carefully for there may also be written that "in the BJP rule all the muslims fled to Pakistan/Bangladesh". Muslims are not fool, they also eat ROTI. The only thing is they need to change their psyche.
RE:See carefully
by Nadeem on Apr 20, 2007 11:59 AM Permalink
A humble request to EC and President of India to BAN this booklet immediately. It is clear cut defamation of Muslims and there ability. BAN KARO BAN KARO
And Congress should apologise for this act and request all to give a befiting reply to Congress if it does not come out clean on this.
Nehru & his family especially Indira Gandhi took India's economy backwards for 25 odd years & the same blood Rahul Gandhi..talks rubbish.God save the country...High time Mr President took charge with army support to prevent civil/communal war in Hindu,India thanks to Congress... as it happened after Independence
RE:Nehru's legacy....
by chetan manral on Apr 20, 2007 12:01 PM Permalink
i dont want to get into nitty gritties of things..but i bet you dont belong to a state like Bihar or UP because the last time i felt safe in that state was when Rajeev Gandhi was the prime minster..you say they took Economy backwards for 25 odd years,did India really had a economy before them..they made some wrong decisions, everyone does..but remeber most of the time while they were in the power -they had a mandate, there was only them without any collation and both Rajeev and Indira Gandhi didnt loose a election but were assasinated..Congress had never been the same, and Rahul is inexperienced but that doesnt mean you can negate what this two people have done for the country (dude, libralisation happend because of congress and maybe thats one reason a single person who is educated and wants to work is employed in the country today..i hope you dont work for IT or a call center otherwise you will only be just another ungreatful dumbwit who are unable to have an opinion of their own because they know less..)you detest the partition,i am glad it happend other wise you would be blaming some party today because they didnt let it happen..because people like you can only complain..honestly,when was the last time you casted ur vote.
RE:Nehru's legacy....
by hiral joshi on Apr 20, 2007 12:08 PM Permalink
Check your fact, Indira did loose in 1977 and Rajeev in 1989. So most of your arguements are baseless. Country was deprived from liberalisation by congress for years. They did not have any options other than opening Indian markets after signing GATT under US-pressure. Growth of IT and communication was much rapid and widespread during NDA rule and NDA rule only saw infrastructural growth.
RE:Nehru's legacy....
by chetan manral on Apr 20, 2007 12:35 PM Permalink
lol..i know Indira Gandhi lost after emergency and Rajeev lost in 1989 but when they were Assasinated they both were in power. While Indira had a anti-USA approch Rajeev Gandhi helped in improving the bilateral relation with USA.He introduced measures significantly reducing the License Raj - allowing businesses and individuals to purchase capital, consumer goods and import without red-tape and bureaucratic restrictions..and as far as libralisation is concerned i do remember NDA sitting in the opposition and making a hue and cry about it..lol, NDA just capitalized on the momentum provided to them,its not that i am a fanatic for any of the parties,i just feel that only looking at mistakes someone made and completely disregarding the good things they did is not fair..and maybe thats why i am only trying to defend these two ppl, you look like a reasonable man because you seem to know what you are talking about, wont you agree Kashmir, UP,Bihar,MP were safer when either of these two was in power..
RE:Nehru's legacy....
by Kaka Mehra on Apr 20, 2007 12:30 PM Permalink
Till Indiraji, it was very nice. It was OK with Rajiv considering his inexperience. It was economically bright in PV Narsinha Rao's time though morally down due to buying MPs. But thereafter everything lost. If a horse crosses a horse, a horse is born (Indira), If a horse is crossed by a Donkey, a Khacchar is born (Rajiv)and if Khachhar crosses a donkey, what born I dont know (Rahul). This is the legacy of congress.
