Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 98 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
husbands
by Soumya Sanyal on Apr 19, 2007 08:22 PM  Permalink 

Husbands should get same option legally

    Forward  |  Report abuse
what about husband
by Gaurav Shrivastava on Apr 19, 2007 08:17 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

What about husband?? If he wants to live with other women he loves, he should be also allowed.
Why MAN has to pay huge amount for divorce?
It should be equal for both.
If husband wants to live with other women he should also be allowed with out giving a penny to wife.

Check for all the MMS scandles, where is India going? Right from teen age kids wants to have BF/GF.
Which leads to teen age sex.
Even that is very disturbing and now with this decision court is wanting to disturb foundation of marriages..why??




    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:what about husband
by a a on Apr 19, 2007 08:23 PM  Permalink
true

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:[object]
by a a on Apr 19, 2007 08:24 PM  Permalink
i mean gaurav is right

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what about husband
by Yogi on Apr 19, 2007 09:39 PM  Permalink
Hey Gaurav..why r u so keen on protecting marriage ? After all it hasnt given India much except a huge 120 crocres... Every man has a social compulsion to marry n then raise kids...Why should it be that way ?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what about husband
by ashok leyland on Apr 19, 2007 08:21 PM  Permalink
The husband has to pay when he is the earning member of the family. He is depriving his legal wife of her rights. That is why he has to pay alimony.
The wife, assuming she did not work, can obviously not pay HER husband alimony. And why are you writing about a man who wants to live with other women? how many women does he need?


   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what about husband
by h o on Apr 19, 2007 11:15 PM  Permalink
You feminists...To hell with rights of wife when husbands and men are made to slog like a slave. Is it husband's sin to be a earning member of family. Why does not the bitchy wife go back to her parents and ask them for support. After all her parents enjoyed sex while she was brought into this world. Let them pay for what they did by bringing her into this world. As for husband if husband got sex from wife so did wwife get from husband and that is equal. Husband gets nothing from wife expect for continuous nagging and life long burden.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what about husband
by qwer on Apr 19, 2007 08:30 PM  Permalink
In that case, how many men a woman needs, Mr. Leyland? People talk about equality between men and women...so if a husband does not want to stay with his wife...he too should be given a right to stay with another woman...In this case, when a woman wants to stay with her ex lover, and if the husband has no other option but a divorce, then he need not pay the alimony cause, the woman is going to get the financial support from her ex lover...

   Forward   |   Report abuse
wrong discussion
by balakaushal damaraju on Apr 19, 2007 08:17 PM  Permalink 

here court issued judgement on the habeus corpus of detension. Husband filed the motion of illegal detension of wife. Here the question of morally right or wrong doesnot come. If he had a filed a case of adultery then it is different case. Then lover can be arrested and husband can give divorce on that grounds without alimony. But the wife eloping with the lover doesnot give to husband to file habeos corpus of kidnapping or illegal detension. Some bad lawyer helped him to file his case.

When filing a motion, think the realtion of the motion with the wrong u have suffered.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
adultery
by bahmophet on Apr 19, 2007 08:13 PM  Permalink 

keep anything clean.
do not leave a mess.
divorce is an option.
then go with any one opf ur choice.
there is no ethics culture involved in this.
least of all religion

    Forward  |  Report abuse
what the hell she was doing before marriage
by Senthil Gounder on Apr 19, 2007 08:11 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

The act of the woman is completely unwarranted. If she is so much fond of her lover, why dont she run away before the marriage?

Now, dont those persons in support of the women feel that the husband is at peril, and lost his due respect in front of the society?

Is he a fool then, to be played with.

The woman should be booked under adultery, just like men would be done.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:what the hell she was doing before marriage
by Kathir N on Apr 19, 2007 08:16 PM  Permalink
You dumbo, remove nameof your cate fromyour name & then you speak of society & adultery.
Just beacuse you get married, it doesnt mean you need to stay with him forever. Please grow, if you need to improve your english then definitely this is not the forum, go to kinder garden & read books aloud.



   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:[object]
by Kathir N on Apr 19, 2007 08:17 PM  Permalink
*caste

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what the hell she was doing before marriage
by ashok leyland on Apr 19, 2007 08:28 PM  Permalink
Firstly you have completely confused the time line. The wife probably met the other man AFTER marriage. This can happen you know!
Also losing respect in front of society is rubbish. Is your life important or what society thinks of you? Only fools give importance to outsiders who don't care about them anyway.
If she remained in the marriage it could be adultery. Here this is not the case. Her husband thinking he is smart filed an abduction suit. The truth was different and the court has tuled correctly.
Do you think just to keep your neighbours happy you should accept a miserable life with someone you cannot respect or love? Isn't divorce better? The husband too can probably find a better suited wife for himself. Why are you crying?

   Forward   |   Report abuse
RE:what the hell she was doing before marriage
by h o on Apr 19, 2007 11:19 PM  Permalink
You idiots a) Ashok b) Kathir ... why did the women not file divorce.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Illogical
by vicky on Apr 19, 2007 08:09 PM  Permalink 

The verdit doesn't make any sense.If the spouse wants to live with his/her lover, he/she should get divorced.The verdit can disturb the basic foundation of the family system for which we are known throughour the workd

    Forward  |  Report abuse
decision against section 497 of IPC
by deep jak on Apr 19, 2007 08:09 PM  Permalink 

section 497 of IPC is an important for the indian society and husband have the right under this section which should be protected.
Randeep Jakhar
deep_jak@rediffmail.com

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Dump the cheating spouse
by Lucky B on Apr 19, 2007 08:06 PM  Permalink 

Yes, everybody should have freedom to choose whom they want to live with; however, woman or man should take divorce first before seeing another man or woman.

It's worthless living with a spouse who has somebody else in his/her heart.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 98 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message