Before 1947, the british divided and ruled and later it is the Nehru - Ghandy dynasty thats ru(i?)ling india in exactly the same way. Looting whatever it can and keeping the population il-litrate to the maximum possible extent
RE:Congress
by Roshan on Apr 15, 2007 01:03 PM Permalink
Dear sir...urs is one of the most inappropraite responses ever posted on rediff. R u sure that the Gandhi dynasty is responsible for illitracy?...however..they sure are responsible for growth of communist party!!
RE:Congress
by seek the truth on Apr 15, 2007 02:32 PM Permalink
gandhi family is responsible for many ills in india more important is the fact that people stole the brand name gandhi because the nehru brand had proved ineffective to manage india
RE:Congress
by Kaushik Das on Apr 15, 2007 03:38 PM Permalink
Why not? in 50 years of gandhi dynasty, how much did our literacy increase??? and especially in UP and Bihar where they always won.
RE:Congress
by Sriram Vangal on Apr 15, 2007 02:34 PM Permalink
Ofcourse they are. They ruledus for most post indepedent period and never have the heart to strengthen primay education - which should have been the priority. Not making atom bombs. They would have come on thier own from educated population.
RE:[object]
by Sriram Vangal on Apr 15, 2007 02:36 PM Permalink
Please note I ahve not used Gandhi. It is GHandy, the correcd surname of Feroz G. Indira changed it to fool the illitrate indians.
Moti Lal>Jawahar Lal>Indira> Rajiv >sonia and now Prinyanka and rahul. Where is Indian self -respect ? Rise above your sycopancy o!indians and show prinayanka and rahul the door. They are no special the are just like us.
RE:Dynasty rule and slavery
by gaurav gautam on Apr 15, 2007 03:23 PM Permalink
all the politicians will drown India to gloom and India needs a revolution, a Blood revolution ,if Indians want to retain a privilege of being a respected society community or India wants to be superpower.A revolution to ousted all the devilish politicians from the soil of India. India needs a strong political leadership, a confident, a strong , a unbiased and progressive leadership.
RE:Dynasty rule and slavery
by educationforu on Apr 15, 2007 02:37 PM Permalink
then why didn't rediff write the article about u ? hehehehehehehehe......
Please be informed, i am an Indian & now working in the Middle East, I have never VOTED anyone in my life and i do not have any favourite politician or party - basically they are the same, any way which you look. Debates & arguments are absulute necessary to broaden one's wisdom and knowledge, we learn a lot from one another, thro a forum or discussion board like this.... But please i only kindly request you all who so ever - please refrain from using bad languages, names, foul mouth, its not necessary, we all know who and what each one is ? we call ourselves educated and come to this forum ? for what to foul mouth, it speaks volume for one self, for what one is in the first place by using such language, we dont want to be like them ? stooping to their characters ? so please i humbly request to refrain from using languages, words, names, & lets debate, argue, wisely and with knowledge to impart and share with others, which many do not know off... hope my small wish will go in a long way...
RE:A Kind Request to my sincere fellow Country Men
by Khanmadari on Apr 15, 2007 12:02 PM Permalink
You have lost right to UTTER SINGLE WORD ABOUT DEMOCRACY, moment u said that you have not voted in your life time. Please be happy with where ever you are looser dont waste your time and others on such forums.
RE:A Kind Request to my sincere fellow Country Men
by dominic almeida on Apr 15, 2007 01:24 PM Permalink
Boss Khanmandari, Please know that out of choice i did not wish to vote, knowing what each party and candidates stand for as being advised & being tought by these fellow gentlemen.... what i just merely requested is to please restrain one self in using certain languages, names, & being foul mouth, we do not deserve this boss... hope you will agree
RE:Some messages on this page have been permanently removed following abuse reports
by anjum khan on Apr 15, 2007 11:41 AM Permalink
Its the congress which laid the foundation of a stronger and healthier india. Congress beleives in equal rights to all citizens unlike BJP, which use abusive words for non hindus. And still BJP cant win with an absolute majority, and form government of its own. Rajiv Gandhi laid the foundation of Computer Era, and now we see many multinationals in India, and a boom in economy. All this beacuse of the congress rule. Otherwise Indian would have become another Afghanistan.
RE:Some messages on this page have been permanently removed following abuse reports
by Sriram Vangal on Apr 15, 2007 12:08 PM Permalink
You are totally wrong. It is the Congress that ruined the country. They are the reason for the wide spread corruption and they are shamelessly playing one religion against the other(Shabano/ babri opening) and one caste against the other(reservations). Shame on congress and everyone still supporting it.
RE:RE:Some messages on this page have been permanently removed following abuse reports
by Kaushik Das on Apr 15, 2007 03:47 PM Permalink
Anjum, BJP is the only party that talks of unifirm civil code - which is a mark of equality. You guys are not able to accept it because YOU want special treatment which congress is giving you (with two hoots to equality principles). . congress believes in power, however it comes. BJP has never bad-mouthed any non-hindu except terrorists, who should be bad mouthed anyway. Also, BJP has pointed out the practices of a particular community that is detrimental to the progress of India. That is not the same as bad-mouthing and responsible citizens of your community should actually look into the matter rather than trying to defend what is wrong. . Rajiv was one of the most out-of-place PM we ever had. He never really connected with India. He, like his forefathers and children and wife, was western educated. Tell me, if rajiv gandhi was the best, why did his children study abroad? Couldn't he have laid the foundation of a few good schools along with the computers you mention? . The multinationals came after the economy was opened up by a non-gandhi - it could have happened earlier and India could have had a better world place now. Instead, because of gandhi policies, it was delayed. Finally, it took the BJP to open the communications sector to actually get the benefits. . India was almost another afghanistan under congress rule - anything against the nehrus and gandhis was banned. America could also have attacked us like afghanistan only because of stupid commie plicies of the nehru gandhi family.
RE:Some messages on this page have been permanently removed following abuse reports
by Balamurali Srinivasan on Apr 15, 2007 11:52 AM Permalink
you ruled for hlaf the time and you know how india is now and BJP in 5 years did magic to indian economy..that too with all sort of coalition pressure..
RE:[object]
by anjum khan on Apr 15, 2007 04:39 PM Permalink
BJP didnt do any magic. In which world are you living. :)) If this would have been the case, BJP would have been easily re-elected. :)) Now you will say that people here are fools not to give votes to BJP, and you are the only intelligent guy.
RE:[object]
by Balamurali Srinivasan on Apr 15, 2007 11:54 AM Permalink
not only that, BJP systematically up'ed india's image abroad and put pakistan/bangaladesh/china/naxalites under check. all in 5 years that too with all sorts of pressure from within and abroad.be fair.
RE:[object]
by Balamurali Srinivasan on Apr 15, 2007 11:58 AM Permalink
equal rights??good joke. I have no permission to start a school that teaches ageold india's traditions.I have no permission to sing vande mataram..Article 301 gives separate rights to kashmir, though it is integral part of india.How much money is wasted there you know??they have separate law..I can't protest when a church bent upon buying a temple land..I can't even block money pouring in from abroad to convert people and forment trouble there after..what fuckin equal rights you are talking about..
RE:[object]
by Balamurali Srinivasan on Apr 15, 2007 12:00 PM Permalink
mahatma's congress is different than the one which ruled india for over 50 years
