Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 105 messages Pages < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Move towards another blood bath in India
by Indian on Sep 19, 2006 12:21 PM  Permalink 

This goverment is pushing Hindus and Muslims towards another blood bath. There will be no option for Hindus but to pick up arms in order to save themselves. And now not one but thousands of Vir Savarkar and Nathuram Godase in the making.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
The stature of our country
by Ravikant on Sep 19, 2006 12:15 PM  Permalink 

Mr Raman;
I all share your anguish at the pussilanimity of our leaders.I also note the despair of the ordinary citizen, helpless. The authorities with all the might and the resources of a modern state do not have a clue, worse; there is no will to nail the perpretrators in the political quagmire that we find ourselves.
The criminalisation of our politcs seems to be reaching the logical end.We have no credible defence against any type of terrorism. No one cares anymore.
Our country is home to all shades of terrorists aided and abetted by the free running criminal gangs.
All this and more is available for those who can afford their services.
It seems that India will continue to be presented with a "no way" alternative in all the international fora.
We claim to represent freedom in its purest form but on the ground we have chaos and anarchy.
All that our neighbours need to do is talk sweet platitudes and flood the country with fake currency, stamp papers, any government paper; land small arms, RDX, etc,and allow the country to stew in it.
Jai Hind

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Bravo Mr Raman!
by Ravi on Sep 19, 2006 08:16 AM  Permalink 

Mr Raman
I have always made it a point to read your articles so far but after going through this, felt that this was the most harshest sounding ones. I can understand the point you are trying to make. In fact even we, in Sydney, were shocked to read the headline 'India and Pak agree to reopen peace talks' but that was not the most shocking part of the Havana date with the general, as you rightly pointed out this cooperation with them in Intell will cost us very dearly. Mr Singh has awlays appeared to be doormat who even guys Bush can trod over.
Regards
Ravi

    Forward  |  Report abuse
well said
by userwas on Sep 19, 2006 06:39 AM  Permalink 

Very well said ! You hit the nail on the coffin.

What can we do - we can always throw the PM out !

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Stockholm Syndrome for Indian Leadership
by AP on Sep 18, 2006 11:26 PM  Permalink 

The weakneed cozying up to our enemies is not a trademark of Dr. Manmohan Singh - it is a trademake of Indian leadership.

I don't recall the NDA under Atal Vajpayee doing much better. But I do recall something about a bunch of terrorists being traded in Kandahar,or an attack on the Parliament that went unanswered... Or a peace process that led to the Kargil War...

Until the sons and daughters of those politicians start dying, nothing will change.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Congress and LEFT paranoid about secularism
by TARUN on Sep 18, 2006 11:18 PM  Permalink 

It is the common man who dies at hand of these jehadist.Politicians become matyrs.Sonia Gandhi who wants to champion herself as being protector of minorities will soon realise what risky policy their government is following.Manmohan Sigh will be remembered as an academician puppet in hands of his master IN FORM OF SONIA AND KARAT'S

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Dr Singh's Stockholm Syndrome
by Santanu Nandy on Sep 18, 2006 09:55 PM  Permalink 

Ok so we talk and talk and finally arrive at a "peaceful" solution to the kashmire issue. Next day Musharraf is killed in yet another coup and another despot takes over-promptly mutilates its own country's constitution and everything else. What value will the so called accord with enemy india have for him??

Or

The terrorists say we dont like this solution we need whole of india or something equally crazy and they start their activities all over again. What do we do? After all this time on we could not defeat them-we simply did not have the stomach, how will we defeat next time?

The point is Musharraf does not represent the terrorists, nor the people of the pakistan neither its constitution so with whom are we negotiating and for what? A country where the constitution is not sacrosanct, what value are these so called treaties?

No peace is achieved from a position of military weakness! We should defeat the terrorists, throwout the tin pot generals, ensure a represntative govt. in pakistan and then, maybe then, we can talk peace with it!!

But then thats a tough ask for our politicians. In 60 years we did not learn to take care of an impoverished rogue nation!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
We need a stronger PM !!!
by BDEB on Sep 18, 2006 09:29 PM  Permalink 

Hi,

A very aptly titled and well written article.Hits the bulls eye. The Indian PM may have forgotten Kargil but not the people of India not to speak of the numerous terrorist attacks in India . The Pak General may have may problems but which ones does he solve by sposoring terrorist attacks in India and why r we empathising with him?

Recently in the European Parliament the pak general declared ,"Kashmir runs in the blood of every pakistani". So if he is not moving one step forward why r we bowing to him?

India is a brave country and with courageous people . What we need is strong leader who catches "The Bull by the Horn" and take steps to put pressure in the right spots of our enemies which will deter them from attacking us . Being friendly with an enemy will bolden him , make us look weak and send all the wrong messages.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Mn Mohan Singh's stockholm syndrome And Indians.
by drmadhani on Sep 18, 2006 08:43 PM  Permalink 

B Raman has explined the Stockholm Syndrome for Mn Mohan Singh but how about Hindus of Bharat.

For 1000+ years, Hindus are enslaved and liked to be enslaved with empathy for Barberic people and till today they are at each other at local & state level.

The Hindu Leaders First must learn that they are custodians when elected or employed and not masters to impose their will and abuse power.

Since the mess of partition, it was thinking at that time that people will kill other and balkanise and moslems temporarily retained in India will not make people fight each other.

It is now, disenfranchise Islam in India Foirst, does not mean kill or throw away Jihadis/Mohammedias as Islam does not recognise Hinduism.

Pope would ultimately aplologise to Moslems, but no pope has ever aplologised or changed his views regarding cowardly Hindus as openly they say the souls of Hindus are burning in Hell and needs to be snached out of their bodies till they are branded Christians.

Talk of Stockholm syndrome- the Hindus in billions en block are fore ever cursed to be a non nation and todays christian moslem sikh administered India is a classic example.

Dump stupid Hindus.



    Forward  |  Report abuse
Dr Singh's Stockholm Syndrome
by Bharat Paliwal on Sep 18, 2006 08:37 PM  Permalink 

The government can have all these mechanisms in place as long as the following is true (in Marathi) - dakwaayche daat ani khaayche daat vegale (the visible teeth are different from those that chew.

Pak has always managed to show false teeth. Let the Indian government show false teeth -- to the the world. However, when it comes to implementation it should show the right teeth -- those that unilaterally crack down on terrorism, sponsors of terrorism (be it 'friend' or foe) - India knows no friends in this regard.

America and Isreal have shown what it takes when it comes to cracking down on countries or fostering elements that harm their boundaries or their citizens. Indian should stand up strong toward to protects its international borders (not just LOC) and ensure that the message is clearly out - no country or internal disruptions can break the will of the country to fight against this evil.

The erstwhile economist in the PM should ensure that the dollars in the coffers to today are due to profits from international trade - not pumped in by other countries, which can leave if the companies do. India MUST be self-sufficient to tackle side-effects of protecting borders.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 105 messages Pages: < Newer  | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   Older >   >>
Write a message