Forgive LTTE of Prabhakaran,Balasingam,Kitrtu-NEVER.For one-THEY DO NOT REPRESENT THE TAMILS but it is a terrorist organisation working hand in gloves with other terrorist organisation like Khalistan,Veerappan,Terrorist organisation of NE.They do not represent the Srilankan Tamils.Tamils run to India as soon as there is disturbance.So Prabhakaran,Kittu,Balasingam etc should surrender to Srilanka & they should be tried for treason and murder of Rajiv Gandhi.After their arrest and punishment Tamils should elect a DMK party and they should negotiate and settle the issues with India making a negotiator status.In no case NO TRUCKS WITH the terrorists like Prabhakaran.
RE:Forgive LTTE?
by brama on Jul 04, 2006 05:13 AM Permalink
I pity you for your indepth knowledge! Veerapan is dead long ago and you cant say he is a terrorist. He is a poacher who killed people for his survival! Dont blabber!
RE:Forgive LTTE?
by tigress20 on Jul 03, 2006 07:22 PM Permalink
dear gopinath.PG.
one man meat is another ones poison. ltte do not depend on any foreign powers or have contact with any other orgs.it is the srilankan government turned the tamils of lanka against india, india should have realized the brutal sinhala regime once the prime minister rajive ghandi assaulted by the sinhala army while receiving red carpet welcome in colombo.
yes we can understand we are very soft and easy target unlike the sinhala regime for many to play the games with our lives!
Its should be mutual from LTTE and indian govt.
by Ravi on Jul 03, 2006 07:32 PM Permalink
Your arguement is superb. Welcome one.
But first indian government has to surrender all the IPKF soldiers who did attrocities against tamils of ELLAM, who terrorised TAMILS of ELLAM & who rapes tamil women in ELLAM.
Will the government of INDIA surrender those IPKF soldiers to LTTE??.
Better indian government shall ask an applogise to LTTE for this and close this issue.
How did you get heart to drag Netaji's name here ? Does your conscience allow you to malign Netaji ?
Netaji fought for independence of the entire Indian subcontinent, and had people from all religious groups in his team. He was not into ethnic and regional issues. He did not eliminate any people, high or low, who dissented with him. He was Congress president two times and inspite of differences with Congress leaders, he, till his last breath was loyal to Gandhi and the Cong party. He was one of the biggest unifiers in the freedom struggle from external colonial powers and was not for partitioning of the nation. He taught all his followers to respect Gandhi and other leaders. Even Jinnah in his biographical note mentined that if he got to deal with Netaji heading the congress he would withdraw his partition plan.He was betrayed by so many, and one more in the form of Kapoor backstabbing a leader of the stature of Netaji wouldn't matter. When your conscience comes clean, you'll stop comparing with bloodthirsty, ethnically divisive, own people killing and partitioning force of the terr0rists. Thanks, if you wish to debate on this, I'm ready.
RE:Re: INA, Netaji .. Mr Kapoor. Have a heart here. Do not malign Netaji
by Salim on Jul 05, 2006 03:25 PM Permalink
I agree with Mohan.U will understand the Freedom thirst only when u become a slave in your own land and u dont have rights to live in your own land.
we indians faced this long back and we are free now.
If Lanka government would have given tamils the freedom of rights to live in their own land with secured life, why do tamils struggle in Lanka??.Why do they take arms??.Do u think just to make fun they have taken arms??. Why do tamil refugees keep comming to india??. Is it they are making holy trip to RAMESWARAM from JAFFNA?? Why sinhalese refugees are not comming to india??. Lanka president takes care only SINHALESE and not tamils.After all TAMILS are their citizens.
What made NETAJI to take arms against BRITISHers??. Like ELLAM peoples we were denied rights to live in our country.
PRABKARAN took arms for the same reason for which NETAJI took arms.If NETAJI is a freedom fighter then definitely PRABKARAN is a freedom fighter.
i can find some ppl comparing netaji subhas bose and his INA to LTTE and calling netajibose and bhagat singh as terrorists. why? bcos netaji and bhagat singh took up arms to fight their cause. these ppl want the same law applied here as to LTTE.
right.
winston churchill fought hitler with arms. so he must be called a terrorist. george washington fought the occupying british army with arms. so he must be called a terrorist too.
same laws should apply to britain and usa too right?
so kapoor, ravi and such ppl should first tell these countries to declare churchill and washingotn as terrorists.
also india should give independence to kashmir and also to khalistan. britain should also concede the demands of IRA. just like sri lanka should concede ealam. same laws should apply everywhere.
RE:churchill was a terrorist too
by tigress20 on Jul 03, 2006 04:23 PM Permalink
yes 2+2=4 thats straight forward answer if not proved otherwise! a legitimate government having a war with a legitimate government is not a terrorist act as long as the other legitimate government has a legitimate reason to fight! further more the UNITED NATIONS head office do not have a definiton for the word "terrorist". the decision has been left for the individual countries to decide who is terrorist and who is not a terrorist. when it comes to the government of srilanka and ltte, the world has been left to choose between a evil and a devil, a legitimate government and legitimate freedom fighters,a majority legitimate government and a third class minority citizens. many countries have banned ltte just because of their land of the law on terrorist not because ltte is a direct threat to the west! the more tamils of ceylon are living in the west than what it is in india.the srilankan government has always acted against the interest of india unlike the ltte. the IPKF was welcomed by the tamils later turned against the IPKF due to human rights violations commited by IPKF. if india can forgive pakistan, surely the people of india can forgive us and the ltte.
RE:churchill was a terrorist too
by manoj sharma on Jul 03, 2006 07:25 PM Permalink
correct you are tigress20!!
a legitimate government having a war with a legitimate government is not a terrorist act as long as the other legitimate government has a legitimate reason to fight.
the british govt was not a legitimate govt of india. therefore fighting against it cannot be called terrorism.
and george washington's case was not about a legitimate govt fighting against another legitimate govt at all. washington was fighting to remove the british from america. during the war washington was not the elected elader of america. he became president only after winning the war.
hitler had not invaded britain for churchill to start fighting him. he invaded britain only after churchill started fighting him.
you have said that more tamils of ceylon are living in the west than in india. so it is more imp for the west to forgive LTTE than for india to do so.
so plz go and tell usa that either forgive LTTE or otherwise be fair and call washington as terrorist. plz go and tell england to forgive LTTE or otherwise be fair and call churchill as terrorist.
if they listen to you then india will also listen to you. bcoz that will prove that law is same for all.
Even after LTTE was banned, all its leaders are operating from EUROPE only. Why are they not containing them like how they are containing AL-QAIDA leaders in their country??.
The ban on LTTE is only written. It is not implemented. It cannot be implemented by these countries including CANNADA.
As lots of TAMIL Refugees lives in their country. What if the EU block LTTE. LTTE is the unproclaimed head of ELLAM. If EU blocks to whom they will go and speak for the return of REFUGEES and about lanka crisis.
Forget EU & USA, has srilanka banned LTTE??
Lets FORGIVE LTTE and teach lessons to EU & USA.
After all ELLAM peoples are brothers and sistes of INDIA.BRITISH didnt merge ELLAM with india when they gave freedom. That was the mistake.
