Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 7 messages Pages | 1
1/6 not con
by anniekapn on Jul 26, 2006 11:45 PM  Permalink 

I agree with everything except your logic on suggestion No. 3. I think it is wrong to be harsh about the accident being one's own fault. Ask yourself logically:
Is it an Act of God?
Is it an Act of Nature?
Is it an Act of Man?

An Act of Man obviously in this case, that involves others. Every body movement is a Math science. Researching whether it remains just Algebra as with ordinary walking (for instance on a sidewalk, swinging one's arm) or a complexity that moves beyond Algebra to Calculus. In this case at least Calculus. As an Act, research could be as serious as Quantum Mechanics (involving optical illusions and 3-Ds) or, further, Fractional Iconic Math.

Note: Geometry and Trigonometry is different. It involves alpha numeric equations, cubic equations, wheel equations, Quantum Mechanics and Fractional Iconic Math. It is so far used in such things as The Law of Bouyancy in physics.

His distraction by the mouse and non-knowledge of the Act of Man he was about to fall into, produced Absentia Consciousness. What was a 5 year old's consciousness level upon returning, during the trauma and, sliding length of time of trauma.

Annie

    Forward  |  Report abuse
A good con job!
by Purushottam Dayama on Jul 25, 2006 01:44 PM  Permalink 

Well a mouse can't lay trap for child. This is a true con job to take nation on ride. How?
1.The pit is stated to be anything from 1foot wide
bore to 2foot as said in this article. Some people say 1&1/2 foot.
2.It was covered with gunny bag. Then where did the
bag go? All 30hrs of coverage never showed gunny bag
in the pit.Was it removed?
3.If boy's one foot tripped in hole then he won't fall vertically and his 3ft height his half body would lay on outer ground.He cant fall with his hands snuggly on his side. If he flayed his arms then he can cover atleast the widest (2')hole.So wouldn't he try to resist fall? Or he was he trying
Banyan Buddha pose?
4.After 55 to 60 feet fall he must have broken his
legs unless he had very soft and safe descent. Also
he should have got scratches and abrasions on his hands and other body.
5.Boy was totally naked and his siblings were properly dressed. It is not that only a child among
3 would not have clothes.
6. If the pit was 1.5ft or more wide there was no problem in pulling out same way he fell.It was more wide as we can see boy was seen sleeping at bottom.


    Forward  |  Report abuse
news!!!
by nitin on Jul 25, 2006 11:40 AM  Permalink 

its really rediculuos to see how media had hyped the story..as if it was for the very first time any kid has fallen in a pit..its a pity..where some of the major news goes unattended..the story was being aired for hours!!!

    Forward  |  Report abuse
How Prince rescued safe
by Rajeev Dewan on Jul 25, 2006 09:35 AM  Permalink 

Jako rakhe saiain mar sake no koi

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Little Prince and the Brave Indian Army
by Babu on Jul 25, 2006 09:21 AM  Permalink 

First of all Thanks to Lord Almighty and to Indian Army, Medias for coverage and all the wonderful people from India and abroad for the concern and Prayers which brought back this Little Boy back to Life from the PIT he has fallen into. Is not it time for the Administration all over India to look into and close the openings of such pits/wells which are dangerous for children for that matter for grown-ups too????

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Why the excitement
by Bastard on Jul 25, 2006 12:29 AM  Permalink 

This story is so disheartening on so many fronts.

1) No construction safety.
2) The media making this a national issue. So what if one of our 1 billion
people fell into a pit.
3) So sad, that the army took more than 24 hours to dig a 50 foot deep
tunnel.

And we say, we are going to be superpower in 50 years. Load of crap

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Message(s) deleted by moderator not displayed on this page
Total 7 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message