India should not have helped the treacherous Bangladesh. We liberated them from the hands of Paki's, in return they are acknowledging us with acts of terrorism. Gratitude less pigeon hearted creeps they are.
what India got out of Creation of Bangladesh? nothin except Intriguing of Infiltrators who helped Congress as Vote Bank.India could not Make use of Settling of Kashmir Problem forever because india was on winner of War, but It could Not. Shame-shame?
what India got out of Creation of Bangladesh? nothin except Intriguing of Infiltrators who helped Congress as Vote Bank.India could not Make use of Settling of Kashmir Problem forever because india was on winner of War, but It could Not. Shame-shame?
No India should not have liberated Bangladesh. Instead taking the advantage of World opinion and Yahya Khan,s speech on the eve of Id that 'Pakistan is ready to solve all the problems including Kashmir' and India could ask Pakistan to give a limited face saving autonomy to East Pakistan and LOC be the International boarder between the two countries. In this way Pakistan would have always to loose something in the form of East Pakistan, on the contrary now Kashmir problem has become a permanent headache to India.
Re: Should India have helped liberate Bangladesh!
by Guest on Oct 28, 2008 12:25 AM Permalink
India did the right thing for its own intrest. Now Babgladesh is a weak nation and a good market for indian goods. In reality India is getting good business benifit from Bangladesh ---- this is the requirement of India in the present situation. Now Pakistan is also a weak country.India is the winner!
Re: Should India have helped liberate Bangladesh!
by Guest on Oct 28, 2008 12:15 AM Permalink
India did the right thing for its own intrest. Now Babgladesh is a weak nation and a good market for indian goods. In reality India is getting good business benifit from Bangladesh ---- this is the requirement of India in the present situation. Now Pakistan is also a weak country.India is the winner!
No infact india should have taken the land from those pakistanis and would have deportedall the muslims to east pakistan. by doing this settlements like Sheemla settlements and all, finally they caused troubled for themselves only. Now what is happening? the Bangaladeshis have become a source of threat for India. India had 93000 POWs, but instead of utilizing them strategically, india allowed them to be free without any negotiations, that was the mistake that we did that time which is showing its result now interms of border disputes as well as millitancy
RE:No
by Amit Kulkarni on Mar 03, 2008 08:23 PM Permalink
It is not a square kilometer to move all people out of it and aquire the land.
Talk something feasible.
It was better that India helped BD getting independance.
Having Pakistan and China on two fronts would be a really big problem. At least Pakistan is not present on the east side now. That reduces some burden off the defence. BD is also a headache because of jihadi and terrorist activities against India from across the border. But it is still relatively better than what it is from pakistan
We did the right thing. We should have made use of 93,000 POW's. But our Idealist ideology... We should now concentrate on oue smaller neibhours before it get too long. A long term foreign polcy like George Kennan's view about Soviet Union in 1945. They need us. Before our enemies reach there, which are already been successful, we must focus before it gets too late
