Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 14 messages Pages | 1 | 2   Older >
Ayodhya
by PRAFULL on Apr 28, 2006 11:01 PM  Permalink 

The thausands of Hindu's temples were Demolished in Kashmir and in so many state of Democretic India and also attack on the Hindus Shraddhas Kendra in India at that time The Media and the psudo Secular Political leaders were not saying any word because The would like to play with the Indian Public and there ethic and Laghumati Trushtrikaran. It is only thr reason of the reply and resealting the Ayodhya happnes.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ayodhya dispute
by mohammed suhail on Apr 23, 2006 11:35 AM  Permalink 

The receipt of the msg ayodhya demolition is a conspiracy as it declares in your headlines, and who backed up the demolition is framing to be declare for putting in front of the justice, ofcourse the demolition is purely a well plan for the cause is not know whether or not to carry or carried to delivery for the minority destruction.At leasst with this submission let us hope whether the true justice authority can open their mind to decide and punish who ever be the personality.

note : the reply is based on the msg of rediff.com share comments

    Forward  |  Report abuse
old wine in new bottle.
by santosh kumar on Apr 20, 2006 07:10 PM  Permalink 

Congress has always accused Bjp and its parental organizations for the demolition of Babri Mosque. The fact is that this dispute was started by the congress and late mr Rajiv gandhi to give strength to the then weaker congress in UP. Unfortunately the show of Ayodhaya issue was stolen by Bjp and congress remained a mere spectator in the whole issue. Why not the all secular parties including Congress assure, the muslim community of indian, to re-built Babri mosque instead of Ram temple. Its nothing but playing the bad game of politics which congress has been doing since the issue get deteriorated.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
ayodhya demolition a conspiracy
by suman on Apr 20, 2006 11:53 AM  Permalink  | Hide replies

Lord Sriram temple was demolished by mugjal king baber in 1857, killing the thousands of devotees, raping the ladies and made them slaves of mulsims.then babri masjid was built though anit hindu UPA govt deleted all the brutality of mughal rule against hindus, ASI gave a fasle news, ppl can't deny the truth. UPA is treating muslims as their son in laws, fulfilling every wish / demand of mullas & msulsims for their votes. by the grace of Lord there will be a temple oneday. nobody can take that right from the hindus. if one masjid demolition is national shame then how anyone described the demolition of 125 temples in JK why ind media did not highlight the this brutal demolishion of temples by muslim goondas. sic& liar cong called vinay katiyar a communal candidate agaisnt sonia did protested against the assulation of jounalists of bukari supports.
rediff always block my msg why?

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:ayodhya demolition a conspiracy
by siraj on Apr 20, 2006 03:52 PM  Permalink
Before making any comment you should first try to get your facts right. There was no Mughal kingdom in India in year 1857. Babur was long dead about 400 years earlier to year 1857.It is my earnest request to you and others who are easily mislead and misguidedby the propoganda machinery of RSS and its associates to cross verify any hate materials directed towards various communitiesby the frontal organisations of RSS or its like,before forming any openion.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Proud of India
by Sameer on Apr 20, 2006 11:32 AM  Permalink 

If it is true I will salute BJP,RSS and Shiv Sena. then it's a National Pride and courage with which destroyed the symbol of slavery and forcefully captured our own temple that is too of Bhagvan Shriram.
This is the historic moment we saw in our time and proudly can tell to our future generation. It is obvious the antinationalist, pseudo's, zolawalas commies will create hue and cry. who cares for such elements.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ayodhya
by balamurali srinivasan on Apr 20, 2006 09:16 AM  Permalink 

Shameless people. when they contend that a 500 year old structure to a minority group is so dear that it shouldn't be touched, how much more important it is to hindu folks(who think that their culture is more important than money) to regain the majid converted temple. that too Lord Rama's temple in his birthplace is symbol of Bharat's ancient culture which is much more older and sacred. we don't want to hurt anybody. what we need is our legitimate temple which was being occupied illegally and later helped by cong govt's to get their votes.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Neither Temple nor Mosque
by Mehul on Apr 20, 2006 08:43 AM  Permalink 

Please do not fool people by blaming each other. All politicians are bastards. So please open a school on disputed land where people of all religions can study and have access to their forefather's land. For Muslims it will be babri mosque and Hindus it will be Ram Temple. Let other religion people consider it something else. This is the best solution I can think of. No politician is interested in solution of this matter for their own reasons.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Ayodhya Temple
by PNSMani on Apr 20, 2006 06:45 AM  Permalink 

It is a clear case of prejudice displayed by UPA on the eve of elections in some States, to gain/canvass minority vote bank; it is very sad many cases are kept pending for long LONG time unresolved and ONLY when they need to use it, some action "seemingly" taken to make announcements suitable to ruling clan
Bofors, muslim law appeasement etc all taken out to help the congress which has no status or standing for rendering justice; Pity we are caught by the Sonia loyalists (slaves) who are out to please her to gain selfish ends; even educated among them !!
pray God save our country; what else can we do??
PNS

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 14 messages Pages: | 1 | 2   Older >
Write a message