After reading part one and two, i am convinced that a war is always caused by some unfortunate political events going on inside the country. From 47 till today its either sumbbodys ego, or the others ill habit of luxury, that causes innocent soldiers to die.
WHY shud somebodys son die because the others son culdnt enjoy a girl he wanted...
Be it INDIA or PAKISTAN..its the same on both sides...When will this end..??
Like a substandard movie on war, for Brigadier Shaukat Qadir only heroes (Generals here) matter and the war of course is just strategy and calculations.
It was ok then because these Generals never died in those wars, they would only win or lose it. In the democratic parts of the world, such decision making has been handed over to civilians, but not in Pakistan. Their authority structure with WMD capability is being bolstered by two rival super powers on the basis of an unfathomable stability criterion. Somebody has got to tear the screen.
I am perplexed, is the mention of Gen. Musharraf in the context of Bhutto an error or I am not able to understand it. Or was some other prominent Musharraf present during those times?
