Yes, Why not? I had come across so many people crying getting continuous harrashment form their spouses. In every aspect they are blackmailing to go for the Womens'commission. If one earning husband can give compensation in the case of divorce, why not earning wives. All are in favour of equalising the stake of both partners, so in this regard why for so much crocodile cry? In fact all compensation matters should be throughly verrified to the extreme extent. Thats all.
This judgment is not for marriage but when it breaks, if there is anything applied to men, then why should it not be applied to women? Now if women earns more then men, she must take care of his expenses (even if it is for luxury) for the simple reason that women if earning less or not earning at all, do get this, then why should men be deprived of money which is rightfully their. As women can have upto 50% of a mans salary then why cant men
RE:Maintenance for husbands?
by benglai on Nov 21, 2005 04:26 PM Permalink
Well ..only husband needs to think about the bond is it ?? When husband files for divorce does wife thinks about the bond and don't ask for any money ?? Come ..grow up .. Just say the truth that Woman always wants the best of the best ..does not matter which category .. I do agree that there are numbers of woman who really need to have the independence that they deserve ..but ..specially the urban woman / modern woman ..just wants to enjoy their life with any cost .. does not matter where the money come from .... I have no problem in it but .. if u want to enjoy ..enjoy in ur own expense ..why u need ur husbands money for that !!!! Anyway ..
if a bond does not exist between husband and wife except for money, what is the use of marriage. what is the meaning of sustaining himself by a husband. money can be given for family affairs not for personal luxuries.
RE:maintenence for husbands
by shailja on Nov 21, 2005 05:21 PM Permalink
I agree to your point of giving men seat in the bus as given to the ladies but I totally disagree to the point of giving them the maintainence becoz wen they are not in the position to keep their wives and the children with all utmost love,care,attention,support,safety,security then there is no point for the wife to help him to survive either.You can't afford to upbring your family but when you know that your wife is earning and giving the best to your children ,at that time you need the money for yourself also.This is really ridiculous.when we as women need money from the husbands they have no money whether they are earning or not but when a wife is earning they need the money from them
Yes, Definitely, there should be maintenance for husband... If the wife is working, then why should not men get maintenance "allowance".
Now both men and women are equal, So in any case, (might be getting a seat in bus/train), if woman is not ready to leave the seat, man should practice the same thing.
I really appreciate the decision of Allahabad High Court which maintains the law of "gender equality" between the two sexes.
RE:Yup, Now both husband & Wife are Equal
by RAKESH MILWANI on Nov 21, 2005 06:02 PM Permalink
Sir,
Would men be ready to wash clothes, clean utensils, cook food and last but not the least, bear children.
The answer is an emphatic NO. God has made gender distinction with a purpose. Men have to look for out of house work and as a provider. Women are best at looking after the house and increasing the memebership of the house (by bearing children). I do not understand as to why gender discussions are becoming so vocal when God has already provided roles for both sexes.
