In the history of Indian Judiciary a convict is produced before the law with certain conditions. I think this will not give our judges to freely interpret law. Indian Judiciary is bound to abide by undertaking given by Government of India. Judiciary cannot say that undertaking was given by executive and as judicary is independent of executive as per Indian constitution it is not bound to honour promise made by executive. However, international law recognises India as one state and hence any undertaking given by her representatives make no distinction whether the individual signatory represents executive or judiciary or lesgislative. On the whole Indian judiciary is not above India. But , at the same time judiciary should not get affected by conditions and should independently give verdict, initially on all eight charges, as per the existing Indian law at the earliest.And if convict is found guilty enough to be hanged verdict should be made accordingly. Getting verdict executed is not the domain of judiciary. This is also very interesting that if judiciary knows that its verdict cannot be executed why will it verdict in first place. contd.
Referring to the Statement of former Chief justice Lahotia we are thinking of person's human right but why we are not thinking of people who were killed by this terrorsits what about thir families he is responsible of killing hundreds of people . We know that CBI has given a word tp portugese authorities but for a good cause you can break the word aslo this can be understtod by those people also .
IF Death penalty is not given to him, The law in this country is more CRIMINAL than the CRIMINALS itself. If the government can never do justice to his own citizens what is the use of the GOVERNMENT.
