Discussion Board
Watch this board

Total 10 messages Pages | 1
ABDUL KALAM told this is good for INDIA
by viviyan on Jul 09, 2008 07:36 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

ABDUL KALAM told this is good for INDIA. In South India Kerala is not developing because of this communist, Others Tamilnadu(Chennai), Karnataka(Banalore), Andra(Hydrabad) is very developed in all sectors, Kerala is verymuch behing because of this communist


    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:ABDUL KALAM told this is good for INDIA
by Prabhath VijayanNair on Jul 16, 2008 04:51 PM  Permalink
Kerala is much better than any of these states you have mentioned. Dont keep blind anti-communist stand in any case. People of Kerala know what the communists have done for them.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
nuclear deal
by PIYUSH KABRA on Jul 09, 2008 03:53 PM  Permalink  | Hide replies

hey plz temme how is d nuclear deal bad for india... as in wat r its -ve points ??? why is d left so much against it ??? wats their logic ???

    Forward  |  Report abuse
RE:nuclear deal
by Prabhath VijayanNair on Jul 16, 2008 04:54 PM  Permalink
Nuclear deal will benefit only 40,000 MW of electricity for India over 20yrs. India's present yearly deficit is 1,20,000 MW. Now we are going for pea nuts at the cost of security & at the cost of a new allianz with the rogue state, United States.

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Re: nuclear deal
by ravikant on Sep 04, 2008 10:14 AM  Permalink
the negative points of this deal is its cost

   Forward   |   Report abuse
Full Picture please.
by VIRENDRAKUMARJAIN on Jun 30, 2008 03:26 PM  Permalink 

If PM needs full support of public too , he is supposed to relaese the essence of the treaty open to public . As people are still in dark what exactly this treaty contains.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
full picture please
by The Cynic on Jul 26, 2005 07:10 AM  Permalink 

commentaries are alright, but could you please give a full text of all the pacts signed during this visit of PM. let us know what we got at what price and let's judge for ourselves whether this was an achievement or not.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
nuclear treaty
by K. K. Sinha on Jul 25, 2005 06:09 PM  Permalink 

Following are my comments:
1. It is true that it ends our isolation in the nuclear field, but it does not promise any thing in return within a definite time frame. Right now the country needs fuel ( Natural Uranium) to keep its reactors running (which are already running at less than optimum capacity for want of fuel). It is not clear when can India buy nuclear fuel (natural or enriched) at commercial prices from the available market.
2. In the name of inspection, it opens opens our facilities to IAEA i.e. US inspection, as it happened in case of Iran. But what technology or equipment India will get remains to be seen and guessed.
3. It will put grater pressure on our technologists to be more efficient as regards fissile material accounting is concerned, which our people may not relish.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
N-technology
by Abir on Jul 25, 2005 06:06 PM  Permalink 

Our PM's successful mission in the USA is highly praisable.But it is still hard to digest the fact that Fuel is ours, customers will be us.But we are begging to the western countries just for their technological advancments.Surely we have been able to produce high quality reputed workers in global atmosphere(read IITians and IIMians),but we lack to produce scientists of our own.So we need ot depend on the west.It is high time to concentrate to improve our reasearch field to yield full self reliance.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Excellent article!!
by Suresh N on Jul 25, 2005 05:23 PM  Permalink 

In 30 years (since 1974) we have not been able to come up with a viable indigenous solution (thorium, etc.) to solve our nuclear fuel supply problem. This pact is excellent. Let's remember that in France more than 70% of their power requirements are fulfilled from nuclear energy, and we are at 3%. The potential is enormous.

    Forward  |  Report abuse
Total 10 messages Pages: | 1
Write a message