Is it my experience or the experience of every one that rediff filters off most of the letters unlike Yahoo where every letter appears instantaneously?. Is it because of lack of space or the people in-charge of filtering the letters have their own bias and prejudices like us contrary to journalistic ethics demand? Vijaya Kumar
I really agree with the editor, our Human Rights commission and govt are botheres about 16% of muslims of India, they dont bother about 84% of Hindus.
Until Hindus are divided nothing will happen, I feel ashamed of our media specially Television, they are always against Hindus, I do not understand why ?.
They should show the suffering of Kashmiri Pandits to the whole world, let everyone know whats really happening in a Hindu nation.
These are totally exaggerated and fabricated lies,such articles did not appear on rediff.com when gujarati muslims were being thousands per day for almost a amonth,that genocide was occuring and rediff was showing only the pcitures of the burnt bogies of the train,probably they value more those metal boxes.
Such a thing never hapened in Kashmir ,this is an attempt to incite religious violence and to show that the secularism should be removed from the constitution of India,well the Rediff.com editorial board is a strong supporter of Hindutva and fiercely against secularism and uses these fabricated lies to make its point. What a shame ,the so called mordern education has failed to enlighten the people who are abusing their share of the media space.Totally disgusting and pathetic, probably rediff.com thinks that Hindutva is good for India,believe me no fundamnetalist country in recent times has been able to survive for long on its own.
Such articles shoul appear more often in the media to let the world know the real situation in Kashmir. Give Kashmiri Hindus their rights. Indian Government should rehabilitate them in Kashmir and provide them full military protection.
